Community entrepreneurship and co-production in urban development

Titolo Rivista TERRITORIO
Autori/Curatori Luca Tricarico, Carolina Pacchi
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2018/87
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 9 P. 69-77 Dimensione file 157 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2018-087011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Looking at different European case studies, this section aims to investigate how and why national and local agendas have embedded community entrepreneurship practices in urban development strategies and which outcomes they have experienced. The twofold objective is to question: (1) the policy rationales behind community entrepreneurship agendas, factors and tools that have promoted entrepreneurial initiatives in urban contexts and how these have determined social and economic developments; (2) new theoretical frameworks able to improve the understanding of community engagement practices and outcomes, bridging the knowledge gap on the relationships between entrepreneurship, citizen participation, and possible urban development agendas.

A partire da una serie di casi studio nel contesto italiano ed europeo, il servizio ha l’obiettivo di indagare il ruolo della ‘community-based entrepreneurship’ nei programmi di sviluppo urbano, discutendo sugli esiti che questa ha determinato. Il duplice obiettivo consiste: (1) nell’approfondire le policy e i settori sperimentati da alcune agende che hanno mirato alla creazione di queste forme di imprenditorialità; (2) nel fornire un quadro teorico capace di descriverne nei dettagli un perimetro di funzionamento, mirando a colmare il divario di conoscenze sulla relazione tripartita tra imprenditorialità, partecipazione dei cittadini e possibili programmi di sviluppo urbano.

Keywords:Impresa di comunità; co-produzione di politiche; cambiamento sociale

  1. Aiken M., Cairns B., Taylor M., Moran R., 2011, Community organisations controlling assets: a better understanding. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  2. Andreotti A., Mingione E., Polizzi E., 2012, ≪Local welfare systems: a challenge for social cohesion≫. Urban studies, 49, 9: 1925-1940. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012444884
  3. Bailey N., 2012, ≪The role, organisation and contribution of community enterprise to urban regeneration policy in the uk≫. Progress in Planning, 77, 1: 1-35.
  4. Bailey N., Kleinhans R., Lindbergh J., 2018, An assessment of community-based social enterprise in three European countries. London: Power to Change.
  5. Becchetti L., 2012, Il mercato siamo noi. Milano: Mondadori.
  6. Bifulco L., Centemeri L., 2008, ≪Governance and participation in local welfare: The case of the Italian Piani di Zona≫. Social Policy & Administration, 42, 3: 211-227.
  7. Bladel J.P., 2005, ≪Against polanyi-centrism: Hayek and the re-emergence of ‘spontaneous order’≫. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 8, 4: 8-15.
  8. Bovaird T., 2007, ≪Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services≫. Public administration review, 67, 5: 846-860.
  9. Boschma R., 2005, ≪Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment≫. Regional studies, 39, 1: 61-74. DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  10. Brenner N., Theodore N., 2002, ≪Preface: From the ‘new localism’ to the spaces of neoliberalism≫. Antipode, 34, 3: 341-347. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00245
  11. Chang Y., Lau M., Calogero P., 2019, ≪Participatory governance in China: analysing state-society relations in participatory initiatives in Suzhou≫. International Development Planning Review, in press
  12. Celata F., Coletti R., 2018, ≪Community organizing, sustainability transitions and public policies: Introduction to the special section≫. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29: 1-4.
  13. Connelly S., Markey S., Roseland M., 2011, ≪Bridging sustainability and the social economy: Achieving community transformation through local food initiatives≫. Critical Social Policy, 31, 2: 308-324. DOI: 10.1177/0261018310396040
  14. Cox R.W., 1999, ≪Civil society at the turn of the millenium: prospects for an alternative world order≫. Review of international studies, 25, 1: 3-28. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210599000042
  15. Dale A., Newman L., 2010, ≪Social capital: a necessary and sufficient condition for sustainable community development?≫. Community Development Journal, 45, 1: 5-21.
  16. Daskalaki M., Hjorth D., Mair J., 2015, ≪Are entrepreneurship, communities, and social transformation related?≫. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 4: 419-423. DOI: 10.1177/1056492615579012
  17. Davoudi S., Madanipour A., 2015, eds., Reconsidering Localism. London: Routledge.
  18. European Union, 2016. Urban Agenda for the eu, Pact of Amsterdam. -- http://urbanagendaforthe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Pact-of-Amsterdam_v7_WEB.pdf (accessed on: 2018.04.01).
  19. Florida R., 2005, Cities and the creative class. London: Routledge.
  20. Gallent N., Ciaffi D., 2014, eds., Community Action and Planning: Contexts, drivers and outcomes. Bristol: Policy Press.
  21. Gofen A., 2015, ≪Citizens’ entrepreneurial role in public service provision≫. Public Management Review, 17, 3: 404-424. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.822533
  22. Henderson J.V., 2010, ≪Cities and development≫. Journal of Regional Science, 50, 1: 515-540.
  23. Holman N., Rydin Y., 2004, ≪Re-evaluating the contribution of social capital in achieving sustainable development≫. Local Environment, 9, 2: 117-133. DOI: 10.1080/1354983042000199561
  24. Johannisson B., 1990, ≪Community entrepreneurship-cases and conceptualization ≫. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2, 1: 71-88. DOI: 10.1080/08985629000000006
  25. Le Gales P., 2017, The Political Sociology of Cities and Urbanisation Processes: Social Movements, Inequalities and Governance. London: Sage.
  26. Lindblom C.E., 1959, ≪The Science of ‘Muddling Through’≫. Public Administration Review, 19, 2: 79-88. DOI: 10.2307/973677
  27. Kleinhans R., 2017, ≪False promises of co-production in neighbourhood regeneration: the case of Dutch community enterprises≫. Public Management Review, 19, 10: 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1287941
  28. Magatti M., 2017, Cambio di paradigma: uscire dalla crisi pensando il futuro. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  29. Minervini G., 2016, La politica generativa. Pratiche di comunita nel laboratorio Puglia. Roma: Carocci.
  30. Moroni S., Tricarico L., 2018, ≪Distributed energy production in a polycentric scenario: policy reforms and community management≫. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 11: 1973-1993. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1379957
  31. Ostrom E., 2010, ≪Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems≫. The American economic review, 100, 3: 641-672.
  32. Phillips R., Pittman R. 2014, An introduction to community development. London: Routledge.
  33. Rodriguez-Pose A., Di Cataldo M., 2014. ≪Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe≫. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 4: 673-706.
  34. Rogerson C., 2018. Local Economic Development in the Changing World: The Experience of Southern Africa. London: Routledge.
  35. Sassen S., 2001, The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  36. Saunders T., Mulgan G., 2017, Governing with collective intelligence. London: Nesta.
  37. Selsky J.W., Smith A.E., 1994, ≪Community entrepreneurship: A framework for social change leadership≫. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3-4: 277-296. DOI: 10.1016/1048-9843(94)90018-3
  38. Shaffer R., Deller S., Marcouiller D., 2004. Community economics: linking theory and practice. London: Blackwell.
  39. Shand W., 2015., Exploring institutional change: The contribution of co-production to shaping institutions. London: iied Working Paper.
  40. Tricarico L., 2018, ≪Community Energy Enterprises in the Distributed Energy Geography≫. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management, 18: 81-94.
  41. Tricarico L., 2017, ≪Community action: value or instrument? An ethics and planning critical review≫. Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 41, 3: 221-233. DOI: 10.3846/20297955.2017.1355278
  42. Tricarico L., 2016, ≪Imprese di comunita come fattore territoriale: riflessioni a partire dal contesto italiano≫. Crios, 11: 35-50.
  43. Tricarico L., Geissler, J.B., 2017, ≪The food territory: cultural identity as local facilitator in the gastronomy sector, the case of Lyon≫. City, Territory and Architecture, 4, 1: 16.
  44. Tricarico L., Le Xuan S., 2014, Imprese Comuni. Community enterprises e rigenerazione urbana nel Regno Unito. Santarcangelo di Romagna (rn): Maggioli.
  45. Tricarico L., Le Xuan S., 2013, ≪Le Community Enterprises in Gran Bretagna: imprese sociali come modello di rigenerazione≫. Impresa Sociale, 2: 27-34.
  46. Tricarico L., Zandonai F., 2018, Local Italy. I domini del ‘settore comunita’ in Italia. Milano: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
  47. uia-Urban Innovative Actions, 2017, Challenges framework for capitalisation. -- http://www.uia-initiative.eu/sites/default/files/2017-12/UIA_challenges_framework_for_capitalisation.pdf (accessed on: 2018.04.30).
  48. un-United Nations, 2016. New Urban Agenda. -- http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/ (accessed on: 2018.06.15).
  49. van Ham M., Reuschke D., Kleinhans R., Mason C., Syrett S., 2017, eds., Entrepreneurial Neighbourhoods: Towards an Understanding of the Economies of Neighbourhoods and Communities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  50. Wills J., 2016, ≪Emerging geographies of English localism: The case of neighbourhood planning≫. Political Geography, 53: 43-53.

  • Rivitalizzazione di edifici pubblici e condizioni di contesto. Riflessioni a partire dal caso italiano Beatrice Maria Bellè, in TERRITORIO 105/2024 pp.106
    DOI: 10.3280/TR2023-105014
  • Towards new geographies of cohesion in a context of growing inequalities: insights from two social innovation projects in Milan metropolitan area Luca Lazzarini, Carolina Pacchi, in Urban Research & Practice /2024 pp.631
    DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2023.2286231

Luca Tricarico, Carolina Pacchi, Community entrepreneurship and co-production in urban development in "TERRITORIO" 87/2018, pp 69-77, DOI: 10.3280/TR2018-087011