Relazione tra fenomenologia della coscienza ed effetti di un intervento ipnotico: studio preliminare di un programma integrato di self-management per il dolore cronico

Titolo Rivista IPNOSI
Autori/Curatori Federico Marcucci, Iacopo Belcari, Martina Rossi, Stefano Rossi, Antonella Ciaramella
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 14 P. 41-54 Dimensione file 225 KB
DOI 10.3280/IPN2021-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’ipnosi è uno stato di coscienza in cui l’aumentata capacità di rispondere alle suggestioni ne modifica la fenomenologia associata al suo stato ordinario. Scarsa è la letteratura che evidenzia una relazione tra lo stato di coscienza e la risposta alle cure. Sono riportati dei risultati preliminari di una indagine della relazione tra la fenomenologia della coscienza, indagata attraverso il Pekala Consciousness In-ventory (PCI) e l’efficacia di un trattamento integrato di self management per il controllo del dolore e dell’ansia che include un programma di autoipnosi.;

Keywords:Ipnosi, coscienza, self management, fenomenologia, autoipnosi, dolore.

  1. Heap M. (1999). High hypnotizability: Types and dimensions. Contemporary Hypnosis & Integrative Therapy, 16(3): 153.
  2. Acunzo D., Terhune D. (2019). A critical review of standardized measures of hypnotic suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.
  3. Bandura A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2): 191-215.
  4. Barrett D. (1996). Fantasizers and dissociaters: Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. Hypnosis and Imagination, 1: 123-135. DOI: 10.4324/9781315224374-6
  5. Brown D., Fromm E. (2013). Hypnotherapy and hypnoanalysis. London: Routledge.
  6. Ciaramella A. (2020). Sociodemographic Variables and History of Trauma and Disease Influence Consciousness after Hypnotic Induction. OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine, 5(1): 1-17.
  7. Damush T.M., Kroenke K., Bair M.J., Wu J., Tu W., Krebs E., Poleshuck E. (2016). Pain self‐management training increases self‐efficacy, self‐management behaviours and pain and depression outcomes. European Journal of Pain, 20(7): 1070-1078.
  8. De Benedittis G., Massel R., Nobili R., Pieri A. (1988). The Italian pain questionnaire. Pain, 33(1): 53-62. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90203-5
  9. De Benedittis G., Panerai A., Villamira M. (1989). Effects of hypnotic analgesia and hypnotizability on experimental ischemic pain. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(1): 55-69. DOI: 10.1080/00207148908410533
  10. De Benedittis G., Del Castello E., Valerio C. (2008). Dall’ipnosi ericksoniana alle neuroscienze. L’ipnosi fra scienza, cultura e tecnica terapeutica. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  11. De Pascalis V., Russo P., Marucci F. (2000). Italian norms for the Harvard Group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48(1): 44-55. DOI: 10.1080/00207140008410360
  12. De Pascalis V., Cacace I., Massicolle F. (2008). Focused analgesia in waking and hypnosis: Effects on pain, memory, and somatosensory event-related potentials. Pain, 134(1): 197-208.
  13. De Sousa A. (2013). Towards an integrative theory of consciousness: part 1 (neurobiological and cognitive models). Mens sana monographs, 11(1): 100-150. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1229.109335
  14. Descartes R. (1644). Principia philosophiae. Amsterdam: Elzevir.
  15. Edelman G., Tononi, G. (2001). Un universo di coscienza: come la materia diventa immaginazione. Torino: Einaudi.
  16. Elkins G., Barabasz A., Council J., Spiegel D. (2015). Advancing Research and Practice: The Revised APA Division 30 Definition of Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4): 378-385. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465
  17. Graham K. (1982). Sheehan P., McConkey K. Hypnosis and Experience: The Exploration of Phenomena and Process. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 25(2-3). DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1982.10404100
  18. Hilgard J. (1970). Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, (24): 138-139. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1981.10403305
  19. Holroyd J. (2003). The science of meditation and the state of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 46: 109-128. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2003.10403582
  20. Iani L., Lauriola M., Costantini M. (2014). A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in an Italian community sample. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1): 84. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-84
  21. LeFort S., Gray-Donald K., Rowat K., Jeans M. Randomized controlled trial of a community-based psychoeducation program for the self-management of chronic pain. Pain, 74(2):297-306.
  22. Mann E., Lefort S., Vandenkerkhof E. (2013). Self-management interventions for chronic pain. Pain Management, 3(3): 211-222.
  23. Oakley D., Halligan P. (2013). Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(8): 565-576.
  24. Pekala R. (1991). Hypnotic types: Evidence from a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis, 8(2): 95-104.
  25. Pekala R., Forbes E. (1997). Types of hypnotically (un) susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience: Towards a typology of hypnotic types. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 39(3): 212-224. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.1997.10403386
  26. Pekala R., Kumar V. (2000). Operationalizing “trance” I: Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 43(2): 107-135. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2000.10404265
  27. Pekala R. (2002). Operationalizing Trance II: Clinical Application Using a Psychophenomenological Approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44(3-4): 241-255. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2002.10403484
  28. Pekala R. (2015). Hypnosis as a “State of Consciousness”: How Quantifying the Mind Can Help Us Better Understand Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(4): 402-424. DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2015.1011480
  29. Pekala R., Baglio F., Cabinio M., Lipari S., Baglio G., Mendozzi L. (2017). Hypnotism as a function of trance state effects, expectancy, and suggestibility: An Italian replication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 65: 210-240. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2017.1276365
  30. Rainville P., Hofbauer R., Bushnell M., Duncan G., Price D. (2002). Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6): 887-901. DOI: 10.1162/089892902760191117
  31. Sheehan P., McConkey K. (2015). Hypnosis and experience (Psychology Revivals): The exploration of phenomena and process. London: Routledge.
  32. Shor R., Orne E. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 28(1): 46-52. DOI: 10.1080/00207148008409827
  33. Smith D. (1986). The structure of (self-) consciousness. Topoi, 5(2): 149-156. DOI: 10.1007/BF00139228
  34. Smith D. (2016). The several factors of (self-) consciousness. Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 7(3): 291-302.
  35. Snaith R., Zigmond A. (1986). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. British Medical Journal, 292(6516): 344.
  36. Tart C. (1986). Consciousness, altered states, and worlds of experience. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 18(2): 159-170.
  37. Tononi G., Edelman G. (1998). Consciousness and complexity. Science, 282(5395): 1846-1851.
  38. Tononi G., Koch C. (2015). Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668).  
  39. Vithoulkas G., Muresanu D. (2014). Conscience and consciousness: a definition. Journal of Medicine and Life, 7(1): 104.
  40. Woody E., Szechtman H. (2007). To see feelingly: emotion, motivation and hypnosis. In Jamieson G.A., Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 241-255). Regno Unito: Oxford University Press.
  41. Zigmond A., Snaith R. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 67 (6): 361-370.

Federico Marcucci, Iacopo Belcari, Martina Rossi, Stefano Rossi, Antonella Ciaramella, Relazione tra fenomenologia della coscienza ed effetti di un intervento ipnotico: studio preliminare di un programma integrato di self-management per il dolore cronico in "IPNOSI" 1/2021, pp 41-54, DOI: 10.3280/IPN2021-001003