Le risposte. Un bilancio: commenti sullo stato attuale della psicoanalisi

Journal title PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE
Author/s Jerome C. Wakefield
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/3
Language Italian Pages 7 P. 625-631 File size 34 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2016-003061
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Buss D.M., Haselton M.M.G., Shackelford T.K., Bleske A. & Wakefield J.C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53: 533-548.
  2. Dreyfus H.L. & Wakefield J.C. (1988). From depth psychology to breadth psychology: A phenomenological approach to psychopathology. In: Messer S., Sass L. & Woolfolk R., editorss, Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Approaches to Personality, Psychotherapy, and Psychopathology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1988, pp. 272-288.
  3. Eagle M.N. (1984). Recent Developments in Psychoanalysis. A Critical Evaluation. New York: McGraw-Hill (ristampa: Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1987) (trad. it.: La psicoanalisi contemporanea. Bari: Laterza, 1988). Edizione su Internet del cap. 11 (ed. or. cap. 12): “Carenze di sviluppo e conflitto dinamico”: www.priory.com/ital/documig8.htm.
  4. Eagle M.N. (2000). La svolta post-moderna in psicoanalisi. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XXXIV, 4: 5-44 (una successiva versione: Eagle M.N., The postmodern turn in psychoanalysis: A critique. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 2003, 20, 3: 411-424. DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.20.3.411)
  5. Eagle M.N. (2011). From Classical to Contemporary Psychoanalysis. A Critique and Integration. New York: Routledge (trad. it.: Da Freud alla psicoanalisi contemporanea. Critica e integrazione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2012; trad. it. delle pp. 131-143: La natura sociale della mente. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 2011, XLV, 1: 7-22).
  6. Eagle M.N. (2013). Attachment and Psychoanalysis. Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications. New York: Guilford (trad. it.: Attaccamento e psicoanalisi. Teoria, ricerca e implicazioni cliniche. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2013).
  7. Eagle M., Wakefield J.C. & Wolitzky D. (2003). Interpreting Mitchell’s constructivism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51 (Supplement): 163-180.
  8. Foucault M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: L’archeologia del sapere. Milano: Rizzoli, 1969).
  9. Foucault M. (1974-75). Les anormaux: cours au Collège de France (1974-1975). Paris: Gallimard, 1999 (trad. it.: Gli anormali: corso al Collège de France, 1974-1975. Milano: Feltrinelli, 2000).
  10. Foucault M. (1976). Histoire de la sexualité, 1: La Volonte de savoir. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: Storia della sessualità, 1: La volontà di sapere. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1978).
  11. Freud S. (1908 [1909]). Analisi della fobia di un bambino di cinque anni (Caso clinico del piccolo Hans). Opere, 5: 481-589. Torino: Boringhieri, 1970. Kuhn T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolution (Second edition: 1970). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (trad. it.: La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche. Torino: Einaudi, 1969).
  12. Wakefield J.C. (1989). Levels of explanation in personality theory. In: Buss D. & Cantor N., editors, Personality Psychology: Recent Trends and Emerging Directions. New York: Springer, 1989, pp. 333-346.
  13. Wakefield J.C. (1990a). Why instinctual impulses can’t be unconscious: An exploration of Freud’s cognitivism. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 13: 265-288.
  14. Wakefield J C. (1990b). Is Freud’s concept of instinct incoherent? Resolving Strachey’s dilemma. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 13: 241-264.
  15. Wakefield J.C. (1991). Why emotions can’t be unconscious: An exploration of Freud’s essentialism. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14: 29-67.
  16. Wakefield J.C. (1992a). Freud and the intentionality of affect. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 9, 1: 1-23. DOI: 10.1037/h0079322
  17. Wakefield J.C. (1992b). Freud and cognitive psychology: The conceptual interface. In: Barron J.W., Eagle M.N. & Wolitzky D.L., editors, Interface of Psychoanalysis and Psychology.
  18. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1992, pp. 77-98 (trad. it.: Freud e la psicologia cognitiva: la interfaccia concettuale. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1994, XXVIII, 2: 33-65).
  19. Wakefield J.C. (2007a). Max Graf’s “Reminiscences of Professor Sigmund Freud” revisited: New evidence from the Freud Archives. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76, 1: 149-192. DOI 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2007.tb00250.x.
  20. Wakefield J.C. (2007b). Why psychology needs conceptual analysts: Wachtel’s “Discontents” revisited. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12, 1: 39-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.appsy.2007.07.014
  21. Wakefield J.C. (2007c). Attachment and sibling rivalry in Little Hans: The “phantasy of the two giraffes” reconsidered. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 3: 821-849. DOI: 10.1177/00030651070550032001
  22. Wakefield J.C. (2007d). Little Hans and attachment theory: Bowlby’s hypothesis reconsidered in light of new evidence from the Freud Archives. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 62: 61-91.
  23. Wakefield J.C. (2008). Little Hans and the thought police: The “Policeman Fantasies” as the first supervisory transference fantasies. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89, 1: 71-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2007.00007.x
  24. Wakefield J.C. (2014). Wittgenstein’s nightmare: why the RDoC grid needs a conceptual dimension. World Psychiatry, 13, 1: 38-40. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20097
  25. Wakefield J.C. (2016). The concepts of biological function and dysfunction: Toward a conceptual foundation for evolutionary psychopathology. In: Buss D., editor, Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pp. 988-1006.
  26. Wakefield J.C. & Baer J.C. (2010). The cognitivization of psychoanalysis: Toward an integration of psychodynamic and cognitive theories. In: Borden W., editor, Reshaping Theory in Contemporary Social Work: Toward a Critical Pluralism in Clinical Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010, pp. 51-80.
  27. Wakefield J.C. & Dreyfus H.L. (1991). Phenomenology and the intentionality of action. In: LePore E. & Gulick R.V., editors, John Searle and his Critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991, pp. 259-270.
  28. White R.W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 5: 297-333. DOI: 10.1037/h0040934

  • Il paziente ha paura dell'analista. Una discussione dal punto di vista della psicoanalisi relazionale Daniela De Robertis, in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 2/2019 pp.241
    DOI: 10.3280/PU2019-002003
  • L'anti-Edipo dalla prospettiva della filosofia della scienza e da quella foucaultiana del sapere-potere Jerome C. Wakefield, in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 2/2023 pp.187
    DOI: 10.3280/PU2023-002002
  • Where is psychoanalysis today? Sixty-two psychoanalysts share their subjective perspectives on the state of the art of psychoanalysis: A qualitative thematic analysis Alberto Stefana, Barbara Celentani, Aleksandar Dimitrijevic, Paolo Migone, Cesare Albasi, in International Forum of Psychoanalysis /2021 pp.234
    DOI: 10.1080/0803706X.2021.1991594

Jerome C. Wakefield, Le risposte. Un bilancio: commenti sullo stato attuale della psicoanalisi in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2016, pp 625-631, DOI: 10.3280/PU2016-003061