La dogmatica giuridica come scienza empirica irriducibile alla sociologia del diritto. Salvare la tesi weberiana della distinzione trascendendola

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Author/s Edoardo Fittipaldi
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 55-76 File size 475 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2017-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Albert, Hans, 1978. Traktat über rationale Praxis. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  2. —, 1987. Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  3. —, 1991. Traktat über kritische Vernunft. 5a edizione. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  4. —, 1994. Pragmatismus und kritischer Rationalismus. Zur Rolle pragmatischer Tendenzen im modernen Denken. In Kurt Salamum (ed.) Kritischer Rationa-lismus und Pragmatismus. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.
  5. —, 2000. Kritischer Rationalismus. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  6. Berkeley, George, 1970[1734]. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. 2nd edition. Indianapolis: & New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
  7. Weber, Max, 1913[1985]. Über einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie. In Johannes Winckelmann (Hrsg.) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  8. —, 1921-21[1976]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (Johannes Winckelmann Hrsg.). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Sie-beck).
  9. Zermelo, Ernst., 1904. Neuer Beweis, dass jede Menge Wohlordnung werden kann (Aus einem an Herrn Hilbert gerichteten Briefe). Mathematische Annalen, 59: 514-16.
  10. Taylor, John R., 2003. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Sacco, Rodolfo, 1991. Legal Formants. A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 1: 1-34 & 39, 2: 343-401.
  12. Rosser, John Barkley, 1953. Logic for Mathematicians. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
  13. Priest, Graham, 1987. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent. Dordrecht etc.: Martinus Nijhoff.
  14. —, 2016. Axel Hägerström at the Origins of the Uppsala School. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer
  15. Pattaro, Enrico, 2005. The Law and the Right. A Reappraisal of the Reality that Ought to Be. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  16. —, 2007. From Human Rights to Fundamental Rights. Consequences of a concep-tual distinction. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 93, 3: 396-42.
  17. Palombella G., 2001. Arguments in Favour of a Functional Theory of Fundamental Rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 14, 3: 299-326.
  18. —, 1971. Law as Fact. 2a edizione. London: Stevens & Sons.
  19. Olivecrona, Karl, 1948. Is a Sociological Explanation of Law Possible? Theoria, 14: 167-207.
  20. Leiter, Brian, 2007. Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Lakatos, Imre, 1978. What Does a Mathematical Proof Prove? In Imre Lakatos (John Worrall & Gregory Currie eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Lakatos, Imre, 1962[1978]. Infinite Regress and Foundations of Mathematics. In Imre Lakatos (John Worrall & Gregory Currie eds.) Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Kelsen, Hans, 1941. The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review, 55, 1: 44-70.
  24. Hart, Herbert L.A., 1957[1983]. Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence. In Her-bert L.A. Hart, Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  25. —, 2016b. Introduction: Continental Legal Realism. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  26. —, 2016a. Jerzy Lande. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philos-ophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
  27. —, 2015b. Contradictions as Empirical Incompatibilities: Bridging Psychology of Ethical Emotions with Normative Dogmatics. In Stefano Colloca & Paolo Di Lucia (eds.) L’impossibilità normativa. Milan: LED.
  28. —, 2015a. Love, Anankasticity, and Human Rights: The Perspective of a Pet-rażyckian Continental Legal Realism. In Piotr Szymaniec (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality and the Protection of the Fundamental rights in the European States. Wałbrzych: Wydawnictwo Państwowej Wyższej Szkoły Zawodowej im. Angelusa Silesiusa w Wałbrzychu.
  29. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2003. Scienza del diritto e razionalismo critico. Il programma epistemologico di Hans Albert per scienza e la sociologia del diritto. Milano: Giuffrè.
  30. —, 2005b. A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism. 13 (3): 252-276.
  31. —, 2005a. Whither Mathematics? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 52, 11: 1350-1356.
  32. Davies, E. Brian, 2004. A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism, --http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1681/1/pluralism16.pdf (visitato l’1 febbraio 2017).

Edoardo Fittipaldi, La dogmatica giuridica come scienza empirica irriducibile alla sociologia del diritto. Salvare la tesi weberiana della distinzione trascendendola in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 1/2017, pp 55-76, DOI: 10.3280/SD2017-001004