Il discorso sullo sviluppo negli anni '90

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Author/s Maria Golinelli
Publishing Year 2003 Issue 2002/67
Language Italian Pages 14 P. File size 144 KB
DOI
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Giving a sure and utilizable definition of development as an analytic category is practically impossible because of the difficulty in avoiding to affirm implicitly personal judgements of value. In the attempt to overcome the obstacle, in the last decades various particularistic approaches to development have been elaborated. I will underline especially two approaches that during the 90s achieved - and it seems they are still achieving - a widespread support in the context of two specific disciplines: the theory of social capital in the context of the sociology of development and the approach of sharing development in the context of the anthropology of development. An issue is still open at the end of the century: to find an efficient and effective unit of measure of development that will be able to achieve a substantial international support.

Maria Golinelli, Il discorso sullo sviluppo negli anni '90 in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 67/2002, pp , DOI: