The Chicago School and Qualitative Methods: methodological formulations in Ernest Burgess’ Urban Micro-Sociology
Journal title SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Author/s Juan I. Piovani, Maria Eugenia Rausky, Javier Santos
Publishing Year 2010 Issue 2010/91
Language Italian Pages 10 P. 43-52 File size 369 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2010-091002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Authors such as M. Bulmer indicate that methodological reflection was not one of the characteristic traits of the Chicago School. However, during the 1920’s articles started appearing in the School’s review (The American Journal of Sociology), which underlined the importance of methodological debate for the development of Sociology. Many of the leading intellectuals, among which Blumer, debated whether social science methods should be derived from natural sciences or be developed endogenously, if they should be formulated prior or subsequently to empirical research. Considering the final outcome of the debate, in this essay the Authors propose to examine the methodological formulations that, explicitly or implicitly, were built in researches on Urban Micro-Sociology conducted by Ernest Burgess, one of the most prominent empirical researchers of the School.
Juan I. Piovani, Maria Eugenia Rausky, Javier Santos, La Scuola di Chicago e i metodi qualitativi: le formulazioni metodologiche nella microsociologia urbana di Ernest Burgess in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 91/2010, pp 43-52, DOI: 10.3280/SR2010-091002