Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Claudine Tiercelin
Publishing Year 2010 Issue 2010/3
Language French Pages 16 P. 13-28 File size 294 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2010-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
Peirce and Wittgenstein have shown that doubt, as much as belief, needs reasons. Both have close pragmatist views in their criticism of radical doubt, but have different answers. Whereas Wittgenstein wavers between a realistic and neo-pyrrhonian reaction, Peirce relies on a scientific and metaphysical version of realism and common sensism, yet remains so critical and fallibilistic that he keeps close to skepticism. The aim of the paper is to show the variety of the pragmatist parries to the skeptical challenge and the superiority of Peirce’s approach.
Peirce e Wittgenstein mostrano che il dubbio, come la credenza, ha bisogno di ragioni. Entrambi sviluppano le loro critiche al dubbio radicale secondo una prospettiva pragmatista, ma danno risposte diverse: Wittgenstein ondeggia tra una reazione realista e una pirronista, mentre Peirce sostiene una versione scientifica e metafisica del realismo e della filosofia del senso comune, rimanendo tuttavia così critico e fallibilista da tenersi solo a un passo dallo scetticismo. L’intento dell’articolo è di mostrare la varietà delle risposte pragmatiste alla sfida scettica e la superiorità della prospettiva peirceana.
Keywords: Critical Common Sense, Peirce, Pragmatism, Radical doubt, Scepticism, Wittgenstein
Claudine Tiercelin, Peirce et Wittgenstein face au défi sceptique in "PARADIGMI" 3/2010, pp 13-28, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2010-003002