Generativity and relationality in formal theoretical models: a morphogenetic-relational critique

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Author/s Andrea M. Maccarini
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language English Pages 24 P. 27-50 File size 152 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2014-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This essay addresses the connection between the notion of social mechanism and a morphogenetic-relational approach to social theory, a connection which poses a fundamental puzzle. The principal thesis sustained is that "generativity" is the key concept through which it can be clarified. The focus is restricted to a specific aspect of the problem. The essay deals with some formal theoretical models of social mechanisms, to understand how they conceive of generativity and relationality. The main argument is that from the theory of counterfactuals through analytical sociology, to E-state structuralism, the concept of generativity gains momentum and ontological thickness. The remaining theoretical problems that make formal models poorly generative are then quickly outlined: (i) most SM theory is often still deterministic, since mechanisms are directly related to outcomes; (ii) social relationships are usually considered in a quite reductive way; (iii) the stratification of emergent mechanisms in the social realm is widely recognized, but seldom captured in systematic way; (iv) truly social (historical) time is also an enduring problem. The article concludes noting that different concepts of generativity correspond to different ways to conceive of social policy, and advocates the integration between formal models, historical and qualitative methods in sociological research.

Keywords: Generativity, Relationality, Social Mechanisms, Formal Models, Social Theory.

  1. Åberg, Y. and Hedström, P. 2011 Youth unemployment: a self-reinforcing process?, in P. Demeulenaere (ed.), Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 201-226.
  2. Abbott, A. 2001 Time Matters. On Theory and Method, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 2007 Mechanisms and Relations, in «Sociologica», 2, pp. 1-20. DOI: 10.2383/24750
  3. Archer, M.S. 1995 Realist Social Theory. The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2011 Morphogenesis: Realism’s Explanatory Framework, in A.M. Maccarini, E. Morandi, R. Prandini, (eds.), Sociological Realism, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 59-94.
  4. Cederman, L.E. 2005 Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Generative Macro Theory, in «American Journal of Sociology», 110, 4, pp. 864-893. Crossley, N. 2010 Towards Relational Sociology. London, Routledge Demeulenaere, P. (ed.) 2011 Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Donati, P. 1991 Teoria relazionale della società, Milano, FrancoAngeli. 2010 L’analisi relazionale: regole, quadro metodologico, esempi, in Id. (a cura di), Sociologia. Una introduzione allo studio della società, Padova, Cedam, pp. 195-251. 2011 Relational Sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences, London and New York, Routledge.
  5. Elder-Vass, D. 2008 Searching for realism, structure and agency in Actor Network Theory, in «The British Journal of Sociology», 59, 3, pp. 455-473.
  6. Epstein, J. M. 2006 Generative Social Science. Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.
  7. Fararo, T.J. 1989 The meaning of general theoretical sociology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2001 Social Action Systems. Foundation and Synthesis in Sociological Theory, New York, Praeger. 2011 Generative process model building, in P. Demeulenaere, (ed.), Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 99-120.
  8. Gorski, P.S. 2009 Social “Mechanisms” and Comparative-Historical Sociology, in P. Hedström, and B. Wittrock, (eds.) Frontiers of Sociology, Leiden and Boston, Brill. Hedström, P. 2005 Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), 1998 Social Mechanisms. An Analytic Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2014 Social Mechanisms: Lessons from the Life Sciences. Paper presented at the CSO annual seminar, Oxford.
  10. Hedström, P. and Ylikoski, P. 2010 Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences, in «Annual Review of Sociology», 36, pp. 49-67. Hoerl, C., McCormack, T. and Beck, S.R. 2011 Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation: Issues in philosophy and psychology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  11. Joas, H. 1996 The Creativity of Action. Chicago, University of Chicago Press 2013 The sacredness of the person. A new genealogy of human rights, Washington, Georgetown University Press. Lewis, D. 1973 Causation, in «Journal of Philosophy», 70, pp. 556-567. 1986 The Plurality of Worlds, Oxford, Blackwell.
  12. Maccarini, A.M. 2013 A Morphogenetic-Relational Account of Social Emergence. Processes and Forms, in M.S. Archer and A.M. Maccarini, (eds.), Engaging with the World. Agency, Institutions, Historical Formations, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 22-49.
  13. Machamer, P.K., Darden, L., and Craver, C.F. 2000 Thinking about Mechanisms, in «Philosophy of Science», 67, 1, pp. 1-25.
  14. Mackie, J.L. 1980 The Cement of the Universe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  15. Manicas, P. 1998 A Realist Social Science, in M.S. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, A. Norrie, (eds.), Critical Realism. Essential Readings, London and New York, Routledge, pp. 313-338.
  16. 2006 A Realist Philosophy of Social Science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  17. Manzo, G. 2007 Variables, mechanisms and simulations: can the three methods be synthesized?, in «Revue française de sociologie», 48, Supplement, pp. 35-71. 2010 Analytical sociology and its discontents, in «Archives Européennes de Sociologie / European Journal of Sociology», 51, 1, pp. 129-170.
  18. Menzies, P. 1999 Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Conceptions of Causation, In H. Sankey, (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 313–29. 2014 Counterfactual Theories of Causation, in Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2001/entries/causation--‐counterfactual
  19. Morgan, S.L. 2001 Causal Effect Heterogeneity and the Catholic School Effect on Learning, in «Sociology of Education», 74, 4, pp. 341-374.
  20. Morgan, S.L. and Todd, J.J. 2009 Intergenerational Closure and Academic Achievement in High School: A New Evaluation of Coleman's Conjecture, in «Sociology of Education», 82, 3, pp. 267-285.
  21. Porpora, D.V. 1993 Cultural Rules and Material Relations, in «Sociological Theory», 11, 2, pp. 212-229.
  22. Ruef, M. 2000 The Emergence of Organizational Forms: A Community Ecology Approach, in «American Journal of Sociology», 106, pp. 658-714. Squazzoni, F. 2012 Agent-Based Computational Sociology, London, Wiley. Tilly, C. 2004 Observations of Social Processes and Their Formal Representations, in «Sociological Theory», 22, 4, pp. 595-602.
  23. White, H. 2008 Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.
  24. Winship, C., and Morgan, S.L. 1999 The estimation of causal effects from observational data, in «Annual Review of Sociology», 25, pp. 659-706.
  25. Ylikoski, P. 2011 Social mechanisms and explanatory relevance, in P. Demeulenaere, (ed., Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 154-172.

Andrea M. Maccarini, Generativity and relationality in formal theoretical models: a morphogenetic-relational critique in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2014, pp 27-50, DOI: 10.3280/SP2014-001003