Premesse filosofiche per uno studio scientifico del pensiero riflessivo

Journal title EPISTEMOLOGIA
Author/s Aldo Stella, John L. Dennis
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 119-133 File size 608 KB
DOI 10.3280/EPIS2014-001008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Philosophical premises for a scientific study of reflective thinking. The scientific study of thought has focused mainly on thought procedures rather than thought acts. The act of thinking has been interpreted as intuition, which is described as insight in psychology. This article demonstrates that the act of thinking can be understood also as a noetic act with noema emerging beyond itself and this allows a more scientifically accurate description of reflective thinking. Reflective thinking expresses the capacity of thought to engage in meta thought that can be expressed as the reciprocal implication of noetic act, which is objectifying, and dianoetic procedure, which represents an objective form of thought (i.e., language). A dianoetic procedure, evoked and directed by a noetic act, is intentional and therefore critical, in contrast to an implicit or automatic procedure, which is characterized by the lack of intentionality and an uncritical acceptance of assumptions and rules.

Keywords: Reflective thinking, noetic act, dianoetic procedure, automatic procedures, consciousness, implication, critical thinking.

  1. Aristotele. De anima (trad. it. L’anima, Milano, Bompiani, 2001).
  2. Aristotele. Metaphisyca (trad. it. Metafisica, Milano, Rusconi, 1978).
  3. Barone F. (1999²). Logica formale e logica trascendentale, Milano, Unicopli.
  4. Calogero G. (1968). I fondamenti della logica aristotelica, Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1988). Motivation and creativity: Toward a synthesis of structural and energistic approaches to cognition, New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), pp. 159-176.
  6. Dennett D.C. (1991). Consciousness explained, New York/Boston/London, Little Brown and Company (trad. it. Coscienza. Che cosa è?, Roma/Bari, Laterza, 2009).
  7. Dewey J. (1910). How We Think, Boston, D.C. Heath & Co. Publishers.
  8. Fisher A. (2001). Critical Thinking. An Introduction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  9. Gentile G. (1913). La riforma della dialettica hegeliana, Firenze, Sansoni.
  10. Gentile G. (1916). Teoria generale dello Spirito come atto puro, Firenze, Sansoni.
  11. Halpern D.F. (1996). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Mahwah, Erlbaum.
  12. Johnson-Laird P.N. (1988). A taxonomy of thinking. In Sternberg R.J., Smith E.E. (eds.), The Psychology of Human Thought, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 429-458 (trad. it. Una tassonomia del pensiero, in Sternberg R.J., Smith E.E. (eds.), La psicologia del pensiero umano, Roma, Armando, 2000, pp. 513-545).
  13. Kant I. (1781-1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In Kant I. (1912), Gesammelte Schriften, hrsg. von der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin (trad. it. Critica della ragion pura, Roma/Bari, Laterza, 1977).
  14. Locke J. (1690). Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London, Basset (trad. it. Saggio sull’intelletto umano, Milano, Bompiani, 2007).
  15. Mercier H., Sperber D. (2011). Why do humans reason?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, pp. 57-111.
  16. Platone, Respublica (trad. it. Repubblica, Roma/Bari, Laterza, 2007).
  17. Ryle G. (1949). The Concept of Mind, London, Hutchinson (trad. it. Lo spirito come comportamento, Torino, Einaudi, 1955).
  18. Schank R.C. (1988). Creativity as a mechanical process. In Sternberg R.J. (ed.), The nature of creativity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  19. Searle J.R. (1997). The Mystery of Consciousness, New York, New York Review of Books (trad. it. Il mistero della coscienza, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 1998).
  20. Searle J.R. (2004). Mind. A Brief Introduction, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press (trad. it. La mente, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 2005).
  21. Simon H.A. (1988). Creativity and motivation: A response to Csikszentmihalyi, New Ideas in Psychology, 6(2), pp. 177-181.
  22. Stanovich K.E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind, New York, Oxford University Press.
  23. Tavris C., Wade C. (1997). Psychology in perspective (2nd ed.). New York, Addison-Wesley.
  24. Tommaso d’Aquino. Summa theologiae (trad. it. Somma teologica, Cinisello Balsamo, San Paolo Edizioni, 1999).
  25. Wertheimer M. (1954). Productive Thinking, New York, Harper & Row.

Aldo Stella, John L. Dennis, Premesse filosofiche per uno studio scientifico del pensiero riflessivo in "EPISTEMOLOGIA" 1/2014, pp 119-133, DOI: 10.3280/EPIS2014-001008