Hyletic and Noematic Temporality in Husserl

Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Alexander Schnell
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/2
Language Italian Pages 26 P. 71-96 File size 212 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2014-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

By focusing on the Bernau Manuscripts (1917-18), this essay challenges the sharp distinction between a noetic-noematic, and therefore purely formal phenomenology of time and a purely material phenomenology of the primal hylé. Starting from the critical discussion of the two main interpretation of inner-time consciousness - namely, the one by Brough-Sokolowski and the one by Zahavi - the author shows how the aim of husserlian phenomenology of time is to go beyond the level of immanent temporality and therefore to reach the ultimate constitutive level of pre-immanent temporality [part I]. On this level, a different form of noetic-noematic correlation can be found and described by means of what the author calls a "phenomenological construction", which Husserl develops precisely in his Bernau Manuscripts [part II]. This construction has two sides: the noetic one and the noematic one. The first one can be understood as a primal process with a "nuclear structure", while the description of the second one introduces a new interpretation of the relationship bewteen noema and hylé through the concept of "noematic form"[part III].

Keywords: Husserl, Bernau Manuscripts, pre-immanent temporality, hylé, noema

  1. Aristotele (1955). Physica. Oxford: Oxonii [trad. it. Fisica. Roma Bari: Laterza, 1995].
  2. Bernet R. (1994). La vie du sujet. Paris: PUF.
  3. Bernet R. (2001). Einleitung des Herausgebers. In: E. Husserl, Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer: XVII-LI. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0716-
  4. Brentano F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Band I. Hamburg: F. Meiner [trad. it.: La psicologia dal punto di vista empirico, vol. 1. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 1997].
  5. Brough J.B. (1972). The Emergence of an Absolute Consciousness in Husserl’s Early Writings on Time-Consciousness. Man and World, 5: 298-326. DOI: 10.1007/BF0124863
  6. Fink E. (1966). Vergegenwärtigung und Bild. Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Unwirklichkeit. In: E. Fink, Studien zur Phänomenologie 1930-1939. Phaenomenologica 21. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff: 1-78.
  7. Franck D. (2001). Dramatique des phénomènes. Paris: PUF.
  8. Held K. (1966). Lebendige Gegenwart. Phaenomenologica 23. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2059-
  9. Henrich D. (1966). Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht. In: D. Henrich & H. Wagner (a cura di). Subjektivität und Metaphysik. Festschrift für Wolfgang Cramer. Frankfurt a.M.: V. Klostermann.
  10. Husserl E. (1966). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins (1893-1917). Husserliana X. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff [trad. it.: Per la fenomenologia della coscienza interna del tempo: 1893-1917. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2004].
  11. Husserl E. (1973a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß. Dritter Teil: 1929-1935. Husserliana XV. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-2474-
  12. Husserl E. (1973b). Ding und Raum, Vorlesungen 1907. Husserliana XVI. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff.
  13. Husserl E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Husserliana III/1. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff [trad. it.: Idee per una fenomenologia pura e una filosofia fenomenologica. Libro primo: Introduzione generale alla fenomenologia pura. Torino: Einaudi, 2002]. DOI: 10.1515/9783110916096HusserlE.(2001).DieBernauerManuskripteüberdasZeitbewusstsein(1917-18).HusserlianaXXXIII.Dordrecht/Boston/London:Kluwer
  14. Kant I. (1956). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Wiesbaden: Insel Verlag (rist. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1983) [trad. it.: Critica della ragion pura. Milano: Bompiani, 2004].
  15. Rölli M. (2002). Zur Phänomenologie im Denken von Gilles Deleuze. Journal Phänomenologie, 17: 4-14. Schnell A. (2007). Husserl et les fondements de la phénoménologie constructive. Grenoble: J. Millon.
  16. Schnell A. (2004). Temps et phénomène. La phénoménologie husserlienne du temps (1793-1918). Hildesheim: G. Olms.
  17. Sokolowski R. (1974). Husserlian Meditations. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
  18. Tengelyi L. (1998). Der Zwitterbegriff Lebensgeschichte. Paderborn, Munich: W. Fink.
  19. Toussaint Desanti J. (1992). Réflexions sur le temps. Variations philosophiques 1. Paris: Grasset.
  20. Tugendhat E. (1979). Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstbestimmung. Frankfurt a.M.: V. Klostermann.
  21. Yamaguchi I. (2001). Triebintentionalität als uraffektive passive Synthesis in der genetischen Phänomenologie. Alter, 9: 219-240.
  22. Zahavi D. (1999). Self-Awareness and Alterity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Alexander Schnell, Temporalità iletica e temporalità noematica in Husserl in "PARADIGMI" 2/2014, pp 71-96, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2014-002005