Fragilità del contesto agricolo periurbano: uno strumento di analisi per il governo del territorio

Journal title SCIENZE REGIONALI
Author/s Chiara Mazzocchi, Guido Sali, Stefano Corsi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 51-72 File size 2957 KB
DOI 10.3280/SCRE2014-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the recent years, urbanization has cleared vast agricultural areas, particularly in peri-urban zone. In a recent law proposal the Italian Government proposes the valorization of agricultural areas through the control of buildable agricultural land, according to Regions and Municipalities. Assuming that some factors of pressure in peri-urban area would make the farms more disposed to convert their land from an agricultural use to an urban one, it is proposed an innovative methodology for territorial governance. In the case study analyzed the variables depending on the proximity to the city are crucial in the process of land conversion.

Keywords: Land use conversion, territorial policies, periurban agriculture, farm

Jel codes: Q15, Q18, R14.

  1. Bauer G., Roux J. M. (1976), La rurbanisation ou la ville éparpillée. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
  2. Bell K. P, Irwin E. G. (2002), Spatially Explicit Micro-level Modeling of Land Use Change at the Ruralurban Interface. Agricultural Economics, 27, 3: 217-232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2002.tb00118.
  3. Bizimana C., Nieuwoudt W. L., Ferrer S. R. D. (2004), Farm Size, Land Fragmentation and Economic Efficiency in South Rwanda. Agrekon, 43, 2: 244-262. DOI: 10.1080/03031853.2004.9523648
  4. Carrion-Flores C., Irwin E. (2004), Determinants of Residential Land-use Conversion and Sprawl at the Rural Urban Fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 4: 889-904. DOI: 10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00641.x
  5. Cavailhés J., Peeters D., Sékeris E., Thisse J. F. (2003), La ville périurbaine. Revue économique, 54, 1: 5-23.
  6. Corsi S. (2010), Infrastrutture viarie e agricoltura. In: AA.VV. (a cura), Per un’altra campagna, riflessioni e proposte sull’agricoltura periurbana. Sant’Arcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore. 51-57. European Commission (2006), Directive n.232/2006. http://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52006PC0232&fr
  7. om=EN Press. Gómez-Limón J. A., Sanchez Fernandez G. (2010), Empirical Evaluation of Agricultural Sustainability Using Composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 69, 5: 1062-1075. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.027.GovernoItaliano,DisegnodiLeggedel14settembre2012.www.politicheagricole.it
  8. Kalantari K., Abdollahzadeh G. (2008), Factors Affecting Agricultural Land Fragmentation in Iran: A Case Study of Ramjerd Sud District in Fars Province. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 3, 1: 358-363. DOI: 10.3844/ajabssp.2008.358.363
  9. Keenleyside C., Baldock D., Hjerp P., Swales V. (2009), International Perspectives on Future Land Use. Land Use Policy, 26, 1: S14-S29. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.030
  10. Key N., Roberts M. J.(2006), Government Payments and Farm Business Survival. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 2: 382-392. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00865.x
  11. Livanis G., Moss C. B., Breneman V. E., Nehring R. F. (2006), Urban Sprawl and Farmland Prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88, 4: 915-929. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00906.x
  12. Madaleno I., Gurovich A. (2004), “Urban Versus Rural” no Longer Matches Reality: an Early Public Agro-residential Development in Periurban Santiago, Chile. Cities, Amsterdam, 21: 513-526.
  13. Maggino F. (2006), Gli indicatori statistici, concetti, metodi, applicazioni. (http://eprints.unifi.it).
  14. Mazzocchi C., Giacchè G. (2011), The Territorial Planning Tools in Connection with the Periurban Agriculture Functionality, Some Remarks. Projet de paysage, 20/07/2011. (www.projetsdepaysage.fr).
  15. Nickerson C. J., Lynch L. (2001), The Effect of Farmland Preservation Programs on Farmland Prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 2: 341-351. DOI: 10.1111/0002-9092.00160
  16. OECD (2008), Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Paris: OECD.
  17. OECD (2001), Multifunctionality: towards an amalytical frame work. Paris: OECD. Pascucci S. (2007), Agricoltura periurbana e strategie di sviluppo rurale. Centro per la Formazione in Economia e Politica dello Sviluppo Rurale. (http://www.centroportici.it)
  18. Paul V., Mc Kenzie S. H. (2011), Peri-urban Farmland Conservation and Development of Alternative Food Networks: Insights from a Case-study Area in Metropolitan Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Land Use Policy, 30, 1: 94-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.009
  19. Pirovano C. (a cura di) (2008), Cascine attorno a Milano. Milano: Cuem.
  20. Rajan K. S., Shibasaki R. (2001), A GIS Based Integrated Land Use Cover Change Model to Study Agricultural and Urban Land Use Change. Paper presented at the 22nd Asian Conference on Remore Sensing, held at Singapore, Malaysia, November. ftp://148.231.212.8/Backups/asignaturas/SIG/Claudia/250Rajan.pdf.
  21. Sali G., Corsi S., Mazzocchi C (2013a). Rural development policies and land use change: the Lombardy case study. Proceedings of the 6th international ScientificConference “Rural development 2013”, Volume 5, ISSN:1822-3230. Alexander Stulginskis University, Kaunas, Lituania, 28-29/11/2013.
  22. Sali G., Corsi S., Mazzocchi C. (2013b), Politiche di sviluppo rurale, paesaggio e valori immobiliari. Conference book proceedings, “Evoluzione dei valori fondiari e politiche agricole”, XLII Incontro di studi Ce.S.E.T., Palermo, 22-23/11/2012. Monduzzi Editore, International Proceedings Division, Bologna.
  23. Sali G., Provolo G., Riva E. (2009), Rendita fondiaria e consumo di suolo agricolo. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 3-4: 465-484.
  24. Shaik S., Helmers G. A. (2006), An Examination of Farm Program Payments on Farm Economic Structure. (http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/). Sistema Informativo Agricolo Regione Lombardia (SIARL).
  25. https://www.siarl.regione.lombardia.it/index.htm
  26. Thapa R. B., Murayama Y. (2008), Land Evaluation for Periurban Agriculture Using Analytical Hierarchical Process and Geographic Information System Techniques. A Case Study of Hanoi. Land Use Policy, 25, 2: 225-239. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.004
  27. Towe C. A. (2008), An Empirical Examination of the Timing of Land Conversions in the Presence of Farmland Preservation Programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90, 3: 613-626. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01131.x
  28. Von Thunen J. H. (1966), Von Thunens’ Isolated State. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • The governance of peri-urban areas in Lombardy (IT): the strengths and weaknesses of the regional territorial governance system Valentina Cattivelli, in Valori e Valutazioni /2023 pp.133
    DOI: 10.48264/VVSIEV-20233310
  • AN EXPLORATION OF THE AGRO-TOWN IN THE ITALIAN COUNTRYSIDE AND RURAL DISTRICT N. Galluzzo, in Trakia Journal of Sciences /2022 pp.181
    DOI: 10.15547//tjs.2022.03.003

Chiara Mazzocchi, Guido Sali, Stefano Corsi, Fragilità del contesto agricolo periurbano: uno strumento di analisi per il governo del territorio in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 3/2014, pp 51-72, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2014-003003