Thomas S. Kuhn and Michael Polanyi: a study on "tacit skills".

Journal title EPISTEMOLOGIA
Author/s Valentina Savojardo
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2014/2
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 302-323 File size 91 KB
DOI 10.3280/EPIS2014-002009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the much debated problem of the role played in scientific knowledge by "tacit skills". This is a greatly contended matter nowadays, particularly in the field of neuroscience. As is wellknown, Michael Polanyi was the first to introduce the concept of tacit skills in the philosophy of science. In the first part of this paper, I shall examine the connection between tacit and explicit knowledge in Polanyi. In the second part, a comparison between Polanyi and Kuhn will enable us to clarify some problematic points linked to the role of "tacit skills" in the process of scientific discovery. The idea of a "tacit" field of knowing, hardly accessible or translatable into articulate language, is a very difficult and serious problem because linguistic mediation and intersubjective testability are essential ingredients of science. Tomorrow’s neuroscience, using Polany’s concept of "pre-verbal skills", attempts to answer these questions. In the last part of this paper, through some examples, I shall examine some more or less successful attempts to understand the connection between tacit and explicit knowledge at the neurological or cognitive level.

Keywords: Tacit skills, implicit knowledge, Polanyi, Kuhn, neuroscience, translati

  1. Allen R.T. (1978). The Philosophy of Polanyi and its Significance for Education, Journal of Philosophy Education, 12, pp. 167-177.
  2. Atkinson A.P., Thomas M.S.C., Cleeremans A. (2000). Consciousness: mapping the theoretical landscape, Trends CognSci, 4(10), pp. 372-382.
  3. Aron R. (1968). Max Weber and Michael Polanyi. In Langford Th.A., Poteat W.H. (eds.), Intellect and hope: essays in the thought of Michael Polanyi, Durham, N.C., Duke University Press, pp. 341-364.
  4. Barsalou L.W., Simmons W.K., Barbey A.K., Wilson C.D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, pp. 84-91.
  5. Blake R., Shiffrar M. (2007). Perception of human motion, Annual Review of Psychology, 58, pp. 47-73.
  6. Broadbent D.E., Fitzgerald P., Broadbent M.H. (1986). Implicit and explicit knowledge in the
  7. control of complex systems, Br J Psychol, 77(1), pp. 33-50.
  8. Brownhill R.J. (1968). Polanyi and the Problem of Personal Knowledge, Journal of Religion,
  9. 48, pp. 115-123.
  10. Burt C. (1969). Personal Knowledge, Art and the Humanities, J. Aest. Educ., 3, pp. 29-46.
  11. Buzzoni M. (1986). Semantica, ontologia ed ermeneutica della conoscenza scientifica. Saggio
  12. su T. S. Kuhn, Milano, FrancoAngeli. Buzzoni M. (2000). Incommensurabilità, traducibilità e statuto del discorso epistemologico in Thomas Kuhn, Epistemologia, 23(2), pp. 305-322.
  13. Buzzoni M. (2004). Esperimento ed esperimento mentale, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  14. Buzzoni M. (2005). Relativismo epistemologico e persona umana, Studium, pp. 487-502.
  15. Buzzoni M. (2010). Paradigmi e giochi linguistici: l’a priori fra Kuhn e Wittgenstein, Giornale di Metafisica, 32, pp. 371-388.
  16. Cleeremans A., Destrebecqz A., Boyer M. (1998). Implicit learning: news from the front, Trends CognSci, 2(10), pp. 406-416.
  17. Cleeremans A., Jiménez L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In French R.M., Cleeremans A. (eds.), Implicit Learning and Consciousness, Hove (UK), Psychology Press, pp. 1-40.
  18. Collins H. (1974). The TEA set: tacit knowledge and scientific networks, Sci. Stud., 4(2), pp. 165-186.
  19. Collins H. (2001). Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire, Soc. Stud. Sci., 31(1), pp. 71-85.
  20. Collins H. (2010). Tacit & explicit knowledge, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  21. Conway C.M., Christiansen M.H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations, Psychological Science, 17, pp. 905-912.
  22. Conway C.M., Pisoni D.B. (2008). Neurocognitive Basis of Implicit Learning of Sequential Structure and Its Relation to Language Processing, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, pp. 113-131.
  23. Destrebecqz A., Peigneux P., Laureys S. et al. (2005). The neural correlates of implicit and explicit sequence learning: Interacting networks revealedby the process dissociation procedure, Learn. Mem., 12, pp. 480-490.
  24. Goldman A. (2010). Mirror systems, social understanding and social cognition, Interdisciplines, http://www.interdisciplines.org/mirror/papers/3.
  25. Harris J.A., Petersen R.S., Diamond M.E. (2001). The cortical distribution of sensor memories, Neuron., 30, pp. 315-318.
  26. Hoyningen-Huene P. (2000). Prefazione a Kuhn T.S. (2000). Dogma contro critica. Mondi possibili nella storia della scienza, Milano, Cortina, pp. XI-XXIX.
  27. Iacoboni M. (2009). Mirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others, New York, Ferrar, Strauss and Giroux.
  28. Kaufman S.B., Deyoung C.G., Gray J.R., Jiménez L., Brown J., Mackintosh N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability, Cognition, 116(3), pp. 321-340.
  29. Kuhn T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, Chicago University Press (trad. it. La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche, Torino, Einaudi, 1969).
  30. Kuhn T.S. (1969). Postscript 1969. In The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, Chicago University Press (tr. it. Poscritto 1969, in La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche, Torino, Einaudi, 1969, pp. 174-210).
  31. Kuhn T.S. (1977). The Essential Tention: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, Chicago, Chicago University Press (trad. it. La tensione essenziale: cambiamenti e continuità nella scienza, Torino, Einaudi, 1985).
  32. Kuhn T.S. (1982). Commensurability, Comparability, Communicability. In Asquith P.D., Nickles T. (ed.) (1983), Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, East Lansing (Mich.), Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 669-688 (trad. it. Commensurabilità, compatibilità e comunicabilità, in Kuhn (2000), pp.
  33. 33-60). Kuhn T.S. (1989). Possible Worlds in History of Science. In Allèn S. (ed.), Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, 14, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter e Co. (trad. it. Mondi possibili nella storia della scienza, in Kuhn T.S. (2000).
  34. Dogma contro critica. Mondi possibili nella storia della scienza, Milano, Cortina, pp. 97-137).
  35. Kuhn T.S. (1990). The Road Since Structure. In Fine A., Forbes M., Wessels L. (eds.) (1991),
  36. Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, East Leasing (Mich.), Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 3-13 (trad. it. La strada percorsa da “La struttura”, in Kuhn T.S. (2000). Dogma contro critica. Mondi possibili nella storia della scienza, Milano, Cortina, pp. 137-156).
  37. Kuhn T.S. (2000). Dogma contro critica. Mondi possibili nella storia della scienza, Milano, Cortina.
  38. Polanyi M. (1958). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul (trad. it. La conoscenza personale. Verso una filosofia postcritica, Milano, Rusconi, 1990).
  39. Polanyi M. (1959). The Study of Man, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul (trad. it. Studio dell’uomo, Brescia, Morcelliana, 1973).
  40. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul (trad. it. La conoscenza inespressa, Roma, Armando, 1979).
  41. Polanyi M. (1969). Knowing and Being, Chicago, Chicago University Press (trad. it. Conoscere ed essere, Roma, Armando, 1988).
  42. Polanyi M., Prosch H. (1975). Meaning, Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  43. Polanyi M. (2011). Fede e ragione. Saggi, Brescia, Morcelliana.
  44. Pozzali A. (2007). Can tacit knowledge fit into a computer model of scientific cognitive processes?
  45. The cases of biotechnology, Mind & Society, 6, pp. 211-224.
  46. Pozzali A. (2010). Tacit knowledge and economics: recent findings and perspectives of research, SILFS, 1, pp. 319-326.
  47. Prinz J.J. (2002). Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.
  48. Reber A.S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, pp. 855-863.
  49. Reber A.S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. an essay on the cognitive unconscious, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  50. Turner S. (1989). Tacit knowledge and the problem of computer modelling cognitive processes in science. In Fuller S., De Mey M., Shinn T., Woolgar S. (eds.) (1989), The cognitive turn. Sociological and psychological perspectives on science, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 83-94.
  51. Turner S. (1994). The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge, and presuppositions, Oxford / Chicago, Polity Press / University of Chicago Press.
  52. Turner S. (2012). Making the Tacit Explicit, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(4), pp. 385-402.
  53. Viale R., Pozzali A. (2003). Al di qua della razionalità: la conoscenza tacita, Sistemi Intelligenti, 15(2), pp. 325-346.
  54. Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen, Oxford, Blackwell (trad. it. Ricerche filosofiche, Einaudi, Torino 1967).

Valentina Savojardo, Thomas S. kuhn e Michael Polanyi: uno studio sulle "abilità preverbali" in "EPISTEMOLOGIA" 2/2014, pp 302-323, DOI: 10.3280/EPIS2014-002009