Profiles of change. therapeutic relationship and emerging pattern of helpful factors through the perspective of follow-up

Journal title PSICOBIETTIVO
Author/s Laura Colangelo
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/1 Language Italian
Pages 19 P. 137-155 File size 120 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSOB2015-001010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The author presents a qualitative follow-up research to compare patients’ and therapist’s experience of change in eight systemic-oriented individual, marital and family psychotherapies completed with the same therapist in an Italian public mental health service. Methodology: 16 follow-up semi-structured interviews (8 with patients and 8 with their therapist) were conducted by two trained clinicians after two years from the end of each treatment. All interviews were transcribed and analysed using the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to compare the outcomes and the helpful factors identified by patients and therapist. Most master themes identified in the two main areas, outcomes and helpful factors, which are shared by both patients and therapist. Client identified important outcomes in psychotherapy that resulted to be the same 8 pointed out by their therapist. Another significant finding concerns the therapist-patient matching: each dyad highlighted some factors rather than others. These findings support the hypothesis that change and helpfull factors are experienced according to a specific pattern connected which every different therapeutic relationship.

Keywords: Follow-Up; Change; Helpful Factors; Patients and Therapist’s Perspective; Qualitative Research; Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

  1. Cirillo S. (2010) Comunicazione personale
  2. Colangelo L. (2009) “La conversazione terapeutica: un processo che genera le storie che ne sono all’origine”, Terapia Familiare, 89: 29-62. DOI: 10.3280/TF2009-08900
  3. Colangelo L. (2013) “I pesci e la loro acqua: comepazienti e terapeuta sperimentano il cambiamento attraverso un’esperienza di follow-up”, Terapia Familiare, 103: 9-31. DOI: 10.3280/TF2013-10300
  4. Fruggeri L. (1990) “Dalla individuazione di resistenze alla costruzione di differenze. Riflessione sui processi di persistenza e cambiamento in psicoterapia”, Psicobiettivo, X(3): 29-46
  5. Greco O. (2006) Il lavoro clinico con le famiglie complesse. Il test la Doppia Luna nella ricerca e nella terapia, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  6. Rautiainen E.L., Seikkula J. (2010) “Focusing on therapists in co-research interviews: how do therapists see couple therapy?”, Journal of systemic therapies, 29, 3: 23-43. DOI: 10.1521/jsyt.2010.29.3.2
  7. Smith J.A., Osborn M. (2003) “Interpretative phenomenological analysis”, in Smith J.A. (ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, Sage, London
  8. Sorrentino A.M. (2012) “L’incontro terapeutico e gli interrogativi diagnostici: un’esperienza di reciprocità”, Terapia familiare, 99: 35-53. DOI: 10.3280/TF2012-09900
  9. Sprenkle H.D., Davis S.D. (2009) Common factors in couple and family therapy, The Guilford Press, New York, London
  10. Ugazio V. (2012) Storie permesse, storie proibite. Polarità semantiche familiari e psicopatologie, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino
  11. Ugazio V., Fellin L., Pennacchio R., Negri A., Colciago F. (2010) “L’ermeneutica triadica sistemica è davvero estranea al senso comune?”, Terapia familiare, 92: 31-56. DOI: 10.3280/TF2010-09200

Laura Colangelo, Profili del cambiamento. Relazioni terapeutiche e pattern emergenti degli helpful factors attraverso la prospettiva di un follow-up in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 1/2015, pp 137-155, DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2015-001010