The paradoxes of intimacy: the Other outside me and the Other inside me

Journal title PSICOTERAPIA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Erika Valmorbida
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/1
Language Italian Pages 12 P. 57-68 File size 185 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSP2016-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Intimacy is a paradoxical concept as well as difficult to conceptualize. It can refer to a relationship with the Other outside us, but also with the Other inside us. From the Socratic dáimōn, to the Platonic dianoia, through the Verbum interioris of Augustine, the Lutheran "inner voice", and the "I think, therefore I am" of Descartes to the Romanticism and Idealism, and moving to the twentieth-century’s individualistic concept of intimacy, this expression of the human being has constantly changed. In contemporary society we can see an externalization of the intimacy, which no longer has its necessary concealment.

Keywords: Intimacy, identity, externalization, Other

  1. Améry J. (1976). Levar la mano su di sé. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1990.
  2. Arendt H. (1958). Vita activa. La condizione umana, Milano: Bompiani, 1964.
  3. Charbonneau G. (2013). Consentiment, assentiment, résignation. Psychologie et herméneutique du consentement. In: Wolf-Fédida M. (ed.). Phénoménologie et criminologie. Paris: MJW Fédition.
  4. Charbonneau G. (2010a). Introduction à la psychopathologie phénoménologique. Tome I. Paris: MJW Fédition.
  5. Charbonneau G. (2010b). Introduction à la psychopathologie phénoménologique. Tome II. Paris: MJW Fédition.
  6. Ehrenberg A. (1999). La fatica di essere se stessi: depressione e società. Torino: Einaudi, 2010.
  7. Foessel M. (2008). La privation de l’intime: mises en scène politiques des sentiments. Paris: Seuil.
  8. Husserl E. (1931). Meditazioni cartesiane. Milano: Bompiani, 1988.
  9. Jullien F. (2013). De l’intime. Loin du bruyant Amour. Paris: Grasset.
  10. Le Breton, D. (2002). Signes d’identité: tatouages, piercings et autres marques corporelles. Paris: Métailié.
  11. Le Breton D. (2010). Expériences de la douleur. Paris: Métaillé.
  12. Masullo A. (2013). I paradossi dell’incontro e l’esercizio psicopatologico di Bruno Callieri, Comprendre, 23: 169-177.
  13. Ricoeur P. (1990). Sé come un altro. Milano: Jaca Book, 1993.
  14. Scarry E. (1985). The body in pain: the making and unmaking of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Stein E. (1917). Il problema dell’empatia. Roma: Studium, 2012.

Erika Valmorbida, I paradossi dell’intimità: l’Altro fuori di me e l’Altro dentro di me in "PSICOTERAPIA PSICOANALITICA" 1/2016, pp 57-68, DOI: 10.3280/PSP2016-001005