Integration as archetype. The transformation of the forensic psychiatric hospital of Castiglione delle Stiviere into polimodular residential facilities

Journal title RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA
Author/s
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1
Language Italian Pages 19 P. 55-73 File size 1732 KB
DOI 10.3280/RSF2017-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Law 9/2012 announces the closure, in a laps of two years, of the six Italian forensic psychiatric institutions in view of the creation of new facilities. However, the forensic psychiatric hospital of Castiglione delle Stiviere, in Mantova, remains operational due to the quality of care. In 2014, a project to renew this forensic institution is set up and six residencies with security measures (Law 81/2014) are opened. The authors describe the three first years of this experience - i.e. organization, education and training - highlighting a systemic process of inclusion, that follows two directions (vertical and horizontal) with the aim to facilitate personnel involvement. Focus groups on specific themes are organised. This transformative experience becomes a laboratory for the improvement of integrated projects and activities for forensic patients. However, this project still requires further endeavors to change the previous paradigm (the asylum) into community facilities.

Keywords: Forensic psychiatry, Italian forensic residencies, relational systems, organizational change, participatory planning, integration, work task, psychiatry and institutions, training.

  1. Thomas SD, Slade M, McCrone P, Harty MA, Parrott J, Thornicroft G, Leese M. The reliability and validity of the forensic Camberwell Assessment of Need (CANFOR): a needs assessment for forensic mental health service user. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2008; 17 (2): 111- 120,
  2. Castelletti L, Lasalvia A, Molinari E, Thomas SD, Straticò E, Bonetto C. A standardised tool for assessing needs in forensic psychiatric population: clinical validation of the Italian CANFOR, staff version. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2015; 24 (3): 274-281, DOI: 10.1017/S2045796014000602
  3. Hare RD. Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R) - Second Edition. Technical Manual. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems; 2003.
  4. Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health. Guidance for commissioners of forensic mental health services. --www.jpcmh.info; 2013.
  5. Drennan G., Alred D. Secure Recovery: Approaches to Recovery in Forensic Mental Health Setting. New York: Routledge; 2012.
  6. Lewin K.La teoria, la ricerca, l’intervento. Bologna: Il Mulino; 2005.
  7. Schein EH. Culture d’impresa. Come affrontare con successo le transizioni e i cambiamenti organizzativi. Milano: Cortina Raffaello; 2000.
  8. Benasayag M. Oltre le passioni tristi: Dalla solitudine contemporanea alla creazione condivisa. Milano: Feltrinelli Editore; 2016.
  9. Olivetti Manoukian F. Oltre la crisi. Cambiamenti possibili nei servizi sociosanitari. Milano: Guerini e Associati; 2015.
  10. COST IS1302. --www.lfpc-cost.eu
  11. Van der Hoeven Kliniek-Olanda. Van Binsbergen MH, Keune LH, Gerrits J, Wiertsema HL. Organizzare la Psichiatria Forense – La Comunità terapeutica per Pazienti Autori di Reato. Ananke, Il Porto; 2016.
  12. Zapparoli GC. Introduzione al modello dell’integrazione funzionale nella patologia grave. Bergamo: Dialogos Edizioni; 2009.
  13. Cooper JO., Heron TE, Heward WL. Applied Behavior Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2007.
  14. Hayes ST, Strosahl KD. ACT, teoria e pratica dell’Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Milano: Cortina Raffaello; 2013.
  15. Bloom JM, Woodward EN, Susmaras T, Pantalone DW. Use of dialectical behavior therapy in inpatient treatment of borderline personality disorder. Systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2012; 63 (9): 881-8.
  16. Douglas KS, Shaffer C, Blanchard A, Guy LS, Reeves K, Weir J. HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Canada; 2014.
  17. Castelletti L, Straticò E. Dalla pericolosità sociale all’analisi del rischio di recidiva per i soggetti con malattia mentale. Prospettiva storica e riflessi attuali in Italia. Rivista Sperimentale di Freniatria 2016; CXV (1): 133-150.
  18. Catanesi R, Carabellese F. L’accertamento peritale fra esigenze di cura e pericolosità sociale. Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia 2005; 3:413-434.

, L’integrazione come archetipo della trasformazione dell’OPG di Castiglione delle Stiviere in Sistema Polimodulare di REMS in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 1/2017, pp 55-73, DOI: 10.3280/RSF2017-001005