Investments projects in natural gas distribution in Italy: A model of social cost-benefit analysis

Journal title ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Author/s Francesco Gullì
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3
Language English Pages 21 P. 5-25 File size 234 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2016-003001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The territory of Italy is divided into 177 distribution areas each of them will be auctioned. The regulation of these tenders requires to integrate the economic and technical offers with specific social cost-benefit analyses (CBA) proving the benefits of the different proposed investments in natural gas distribution facilities. This paper proposes an original method to carry out such a social cost-benefit analysis taking into account the different typologies of investments and namely projects to connect new customers, projects to increase security of supply, projects to improve service quality and finally investments to reduce the risk of severe accidents. An overall formula is also proposed in order to account for the possible combinations of the projects mentioned above.

Keywords: Natural gas distribution, cost-benefit analysis

Jel codes: Q4, Q5, H23, H43

  1. AEEGSI (2013). Definizione dello schema di nota giustificativa di cui al punto 4 della deliberazione dell’Autorità 113/2013/R/Gas, determinazione 7 giugno 2013 n. 2/2013.
  2. CIG (2013). Statistica incidenti del gas combustibile in Italia anno 2013. Comitato Italiano Gas.
  3. European Commission (2014). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects.
  4. Gullì F. (2006a). Small distributed generation versus centralised supply: a social cost-benefit analysis in the residential and service sectors. Energy Policy, 34(7).
  5. Gullì F. (2006b). Social choice, uncertainty about external costs and trade-off between intergenerational environmental impacts: the emblematic case of energy supply decentralization. Ecological Economics, 57: 282-305.
  6. Gullì F. (2010). Economie di scala a e dimensione ottimale nella distribuzione del gas: una meta-analisi. Economia delle Fonti di Energia e dell’Ambiente, 3.
  7. International Energy Agency (2015). Projected cost of generating electricity, Iea, Edition.
  8. London Economics (2011). Estimating value of lost load (VOLL), Final report to OFGEM, 5 july 2011.
  9. MiSE-Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (2011). Ambiti territoriali della distribuzione del gas. D.M. 12 novembre 2011 n. 226.

  • The design of the tenders for natural gas distribution in Italy: How much are territorial districts really contestable? Francesco Gullì, in ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 1/2019 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/EFE2019-001001

Francesco Gullì, Investments projects in natural gas distribution in Italy: A model of social cost-benefit analysis in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 3/2016, pp 5-25, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2016-003001