Promoting organizational development in the knowledge economy: the t-shaped capabilities

Journal title ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA
Author/s Sergio Barile, Cristina Simone, Mario Calabrese, Antonio La Sala
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2016/1
Language English Pages 17 P. 5-21 File size 210 KB
DOI 10.3280/EI2016-001001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

With the aim of deepening the study of the individual and organizational capabilities set necessary to survive and develop in a knowledge economy, in this study we theoretically explore and discuss the concept of ‘T-shaped’ capabilities. The paper is rooted in the recent notion of ‘T-shaped’ endowment and moves from the distinction between capabilities and competences. A T-Shaped profile includes both vertical competences (I-Shaped competences) and ‘horizontal capabilities’. After analyzing the T-shaped endowment at an individual level, we propose an innovative organizational design characterized by a nesting ("recursive") architecture of T-shaped capabilities; then we discuss the crucial set of organizational variables necessary to effective develop an organization by fostering and managing T-shaped capabilities. Managerial implication and future research paths are finally discussed

Keywords: T-shaped capabilities, knowledge economy, information variety, organizational development.

  1. Andreoli V. (2001). Istruzioni per essere normali. Milano: Bur Rizzoli.
  2. Andreoli V., Provasi G. (2011). Elogio dell’errore. Milano: Bur Rizzoli.
  3. Ashby W.R. (1971), Introduzione alla cibernetica. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
  4. Barile S., Calabrese M., Polese F., Saviano M. (2013). Il governo dei sistemi complessi tra competenze attuali e capacità potenziali. In: Barile S., Eletti V., Matteuzzi M. (eds). Decisioni e scelte in contesti complessi. Padova; Cedam, pp. 261-294.
  5. Barile S., Saviano M. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and T-Shaped knowledge. A Viable Systems Approach. In: Barile S. (Ed.). Contributions to theoretical and practical advances in management. A Viable Systems Approach (VSA), Vol. 2. Roma: Aracne, pp. 39-59.
  6. Barile S., Saviano M.L., Simone C. (2015). Knowledge Economy, Complexity and the Need for T-shaped Innovators. World Wide Web Journal, July, 18(4): 1177-1197.
  7. Barile S. (2000). Contributi sul pensiero sistemico in economia d’impresa. Roma: Arnia, Edizioni Culturali Internazionali.
  8. Barile S. (2009). Management sistemico vitale. Torino: Giappichelli.
  9. Barile S., Franco G., Nota G., Saviano M. (2012). Structure and dynamics of a “T-shaped” knowledge. From individuals to cooperating communities of practice. Service Science Informs., 4(2): 161-180.
  10. Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44: 1-26.
  11. Braudel F (1981). La dinamica del capitalismo. Bologna: il Mulino.
  12. Burke P. (2000). A Social History of Knowledge. From Gutemberg to Diderot. Polity Press-Blackwell.
  13. Calabrese M., Magliocca P., Simone C. (2016). From individual to organization: the nesting architecture of T-shaped capabilities in the knowledge economy, proceedings International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD), 15-18 June, Dresden, Germany.
  14. de Bono E. (1969). The Use of Lateral Thinking. Milano: R.C.S..
  15. de Bono E. (1970). Lateral Thinking. A textbook of Creativity. UK: Mica Management Resources.
  16. Foray D. (2000). L’économie de la connaissance. Paris: La Découverte.
  17. Goldberg L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure. Psychology Assessment, 4(1): 26-42.
  18. Goleman D. (1995). Emotional Intelligece. Milano: Bur Rizzoli.
  19. Goleman D. (2006). Social Intelligence. Milano: Bur Rizzoli.
  20. Golinelli G.M. (2000). L’approccio sistemico al governo dell’impresa. Padova: Cedam.
  21. Golinelli G.M. (2010). Viable Systems Approach (VSA). Governing Business Dynamics. Padova: CEDAM, Kluwer.
  22. Hansen M.T., von Oetinger B. (2001). Introducing “T-shaped” Managers. Knowledge Management’s Next Generation. Harvard Business Review, March, 106-116.
  23. IfM, IBM (2008). Succeeding through Service Innovation: a Discussion paper. United Kingdom: Ed. Cambridge.
  24. Lane P. J. and Lubatkin M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.
  25. Morin E. (2007). Le vie della complessità. In: Bocchi G., Ceruti M. (2007). La sfida delle complessità. Milano: Bruno Mondadori Editore, pp. 25-36.
  26. Renzi A., Simone, C. (2012). Ridondanze operative e di conoscenza nei processi innovativi d’impresa: il “campo di allineamento degli slack”. Finanza Marketing e Produzione, 2: 7-40.
  27. Schildt H., Keil T. and Maula M. (2012). The temporal effects of relative and firm-level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10): 1154-1173.
  28. Sennett R. (2012). Together. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  29. Simone C. (2011). Conoscenza e impresa. Padova: Cedam.
  30. Spohrer J., Maglio P.P., Bailey J., Gruhl D. (2007). Steps towards a Science of Service Systems. Computer, 40(1): 61-77.
  31. Spohrer J.C., Maglio P.P. (2010). Toward a Science of Service Systems: Value and Symbols. In: Maglio P.P., Kieliszewski C.A., Spohrer J.C. (eds). Handbook of Service Science. Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy. New York: Springer, pp. 157-194.
  32. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
  33. Thorndike E.L. (1920). Intelligence and Its Use. Harper Monthly Magazine, 140: 227-235.
  34. Tosi H.L., Rizzo J.R., & Carroll S. J. (1994). Managing organizational behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.
  35. Valdani E. (2001). Il fenomeno convergenza: coevoluzione, teoria dell’impresa rete e delle reti d’impresa, experience economy. In: Valdani E., Ancarani F., Castaldo S. (eds.). Convergenza. Nuove traiettorie per la competizione. Milano: Egea, pp. 15-33.
  36. Volberda H.W., Foss N.J. and Lyles M.A. (2010). Perspective-absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4): 931-951.
  37. Watzlawick P., Weakland J.H., Fisch R. (1974). Change. Palo Alto: Mental Research Institute, 1st Edition, Richard published by W. W. Norton & Company.
  38. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998), Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.

Sergio Barile, Cristina Simone, Mario Calabrese, Antonio La Sala, Promoting organizational development in the knowledge economy: the t-shaped capabilities in "ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA" 1/2016, pp 5-21, DOI: 10.3280/EI2016-001001