Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A useful methodological tool for research in the social sciences. An example from the online word-of-mouth context

Journal title MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ
Author/s Ilenia Confente, Ivan Russo
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/4
Language English Pages 22 P. 87-108 File size 490 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2018-004006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This study applies the QCA method to the context of the word-of-mouth (WOM) generation process and related motivations. The purpose is to investigate the behaviour of Generation Y in the online context, particularly regarding the activity of WOM about travel/hotels and hospitality experiences. A survey was completed by respondents with questions related to the main reasons for posting comments about travel experiences, summarised into five main motivations. Our main contribution is to provide an application of QCA and its relevance in the social media context. Results reveal that different ‘recipes’ of antecedents lead to share the tourism experience in the online context, deriving from a combination of the presence or the absence of these motivations to generate WOM.

Keywords: Qualitative Comparative Analysis, word of mouth, online, motivations, qualitative methods, sender’s perspective.

  1. Ahrens J., Coyle J.R. and Strahilevitz M.A. (2013). Electronic word of mouth: the effects of incentives on e-referrals by senders and receivers. European Journal of Marketing, 47(7): 1034-1051.
  2. Anderson E.W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1): 5-17.
  3. Arndt J. (1967). The role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3): 291-295.
  4. Babi´c Rosario A., Sotgiu F., De Valck K. and Bijmolt T.H. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: a meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53: 297-318.
  5. Barile S., Polese F. (2010). Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Service Science, 2(1-2): 21-40.
  6. Berger J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: a review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4): 586-607.
  7. Berry L.L., Parasuraman A. and Zeithaml V.A. (1994). Improving service quality in America: lessons learned. The Academy of Management Executive, 8(2): 32-45.
  8. Blazevic V., Hammedi W., Garnefeld I., Rust R.T., Keiningham T., Andreassen T.W., Donthu N. and Carl W. (2013). Beyond traditional word-of-mouth: an expanded model of customer influence. Journal of Service Management, 24(3): 294-313.
  9. Bronner F., de Hoog R. (2011). Vacationers and eWOM: who posts, and why, where, and what? Journal of Travel Research, 50: 21.
  10. Buffardi L.E., Campbell W.K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10): 1303-1314.
  11. Cantallops A.S., Salvi F. (2014). New consumer behavior: a review of research on eWOM and hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 36: 41-51.
  12. Chang C., Tseng T.-H. and Woodside A.G. (2013). Configural algorithms of patient satisfaction, participation in diagnostics, and treatment decisions’ influences on hospital loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(2): 91-103. DOI: 10.1108/08876041311309225.
  13. Chevalier J.A., Mayzlin D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3): 345-354.
  14. Confente I. (2015). Twenty_five years of word_of_mouth studies: A critical review of tourism research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 17(6): 613-624.
  15. Confente I., and Vigolo V. (2018). Online travel behaviour across cohorts: The impact of social influences and attitude on hotel booking intention. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(5): 660-670.
  16. Dawkins P., Reichheld F. (1990). Customer retention as a competitive weapon. Directors and Boards, 14(4): 42-47.
  17. Del Bosco B., Morra M.C. and Veglio V. (2017). Social media and firm performance: the voice of managers in European contexts. Mercati & Competitività, 4: 53-75.
  18. Dellarocas C., Narayan R. (2007). Tall heads vs. long tails: do consumer reviews increase the informational inequality between hit and niche products? Working Paper. -- Text available at SSRN eLibrary: -- https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1105956.
  19. Dessart L., Veloutsou C. and Morgan-Thomas A. (2016). Capturing consumer engagement: duality, dimensionality and measurement. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(5-6): 399-426.
  20. Engel J.E., Blackwell R.D. and Kegerreis R.J., (1969). How information is used to adopt an innovation. Journal of Advertising Research, 9: 3-8.
  21. Fiss P.C. (2011). Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 393-420. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
  22. Fornell C., Wernerfelt B. (1987). Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(24): 337-346.
  23. Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. and Pachur T. (2011). Heuristics: the foundations of adaptive behavior.
  24. Grace-Farfaglia P., Dekkers A., Sundararajan B., Peters L. and Park S.H. (2006). Usergenerated content among net-generation 26 multinational web uses and gratifications: measuring the social impact of online community participation across national boundaries. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1): 75-101.
  25. Greckhamer T., Misangyi V.F., Elms H. and Lacey R. (2008). Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: an examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4): 695-726. DOI: 10.1177/1094428107302907
  26. Gummesson E. (2008). Extending the service-dominant logic: from customer centricity to balanced centricity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1): 15-17.
  27. Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of service research, 4(1): 60-75.
  28. He, H. and Harris, L. (2014). Moral disengagement of hotel guest negative WOM: moral identity centrality, moral awareness, and anger. Annals of Tourism Research, 45: 132-151.
  29. Hennig-Thurau T., Gwinner K.P., Walsh G. and Gremler D.D. (2004). Electronic wordof-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1): 38-52.
  30. Hsiao J.P.-H., Jaw C., Huan T.-C. and Woodside A.G. (2015). Illuminating happy-low and unhappy-high performing frontline service employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(4): 608-647. DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-11-2013-0533
  31. Huang Y., Basu C. and Hsu M.K. (2010). Exploring motivations of travel knowledge sharing on social network sites: an empirical investigation of US college students. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(7): 717-734.
  32. Jeong E., Jang S. (2011). Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic wordof-mouth (eWOM) motivations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30: 362.
  33. Kan A.K.S., Adegbite E., El Omari S. and Abdellatif M. (2016). On the use of qualitative comparative analysis in management. Journal of Business Research, 69(4): 1458-1463.
  34. Kraus S., Ribeiro-Soriano D. and Schüssler M. (2017). Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – The rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-19.
  35. King R.A., Racherla P., and Bush V.D. (2014). What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: a review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3): 167-183.
  36. Leischnig A., Kasper-Brauer K. and Thornton S.C. (2017). Spotlight on customization: An analysis of necessity and sufficiency in services. Journal of Business Research in press.
  37. Leung L. (2009). User generated content on the internet: an examination of gratifications, civic engagement and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8): 1327-1347.
  38. Litvin S.W., Goldsmith R.E. and Pan B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3): 458-468.
  39. Liu Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3): 74-89.
  40. Misangyi V.F., Greckhamer T., Furnari S., Fiss P.C., Crilly D. and Aguilera R. (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1): 255-282.
  41. Molinari L.K., Russell A. and Dion P. (2008). Satisfaction, quality and value and effects on repurchase and positive word-of-mouth behavioral intentions in a B2B services context. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(5): 363-373.
  42. Noble S.M., Haytko D.L. & Phillips J. (2009). What drives college-age generation Y consumers? Journal of Business Research, 62(6): 617-628.
  43. Ordanini A., Parasuraman A. and Rubera G. (2014). When the recipe is more important than the ingredients: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. Journal of Service Research, 17(2): 134-149. DOI: 10.1177/1094670513513337
  44. Parasuraman A., Berry L.L. and Zeithaml V.A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(Winter): 420-450.
  45. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L. and Arndt J. (1967). The role of productrelated conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3): 291-295.
  46. Park N., Kee K.F. and Valenzuela S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6): 729-733.
  47. Polese F., Mele C. and Gummesson E. (2017). Value co-creation as a complex adaptive process. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(5): 926-929.
  48. Presi C., Saridakis C. and Hartmans S. (2014). User-generated content behaviour of the dissatisfied service customer. European Journal of Marketing, 48: 1600-1625.
  49. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. Berkeley: University of California.
  50. Ragin C.C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  51. Ragin C.C. (2008). Measurement versus calibration: a set-theoretic approach. In: Box-
  52. Steffensmeier J.M., Brady H.E., and Collier. D. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  53. Ragin C.C., Fiss P.C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: an empirical demonstration. In: Ragin C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (Vol. 240), pp. 190-212. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  54. Ranaweera C., Jayawardhena C. (2014). Talk up or criticize? Customer responses to WOM about competitors during social interactions. Journal of Business Research, 67(12): 2645-2656.
  55. Rihoux B., Álamos-Concha P., Bol D., Marx A. and Rezsöhazy I. (2013). From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 175-184.
  56. Risitano M., Romano R., Sorrentino A. and Quintano M. (2017). Evaluating tourist behaviour in sport mega-events through a structural equation model. Mercati & Competitività, 3: 101-126.
  57. Rogers E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
  58. Russo I., Confente I. (2017). Customer Loyalty and Supply Chain Management: Business-to-Business Customer Loyalty Analysis. New York: Routledge.
  59. Russo I., Confente I., Gligor D.M. and Autry C.W. (2016). To be or not to be (loyal): is there a recipe for customer loyalty in the B2B context? Journal of Business Research, 69(2): 888-896.
  60. Rust R.T., Zahorik A.J. and Keiningham T.L. (1995). Return on quality (ROQ): making service quality financially accountable. The Journal of Marketing, 59(2): 58-70.
  61. Schneider C.Q., Wagemann C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3): 397-418.
  62. Stoeckl R., Rohrmeier P. and Hess T. (2007). Motivations to produce user generated content: differences between webloggers and videobloggers. BLED 2007 Proceedings, 30.
  63. Strutton D., Taylor D.G., & Thompson K. (2011). Investigating generational differences in e-WOM behaviours: for advertising purposes, does X = Y?.International Journal of Advertising, 30(4): 559-586.
  64. Sun T., Youn S., Wu G. and Kuntataporn M. (2006). Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): an exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4): 1104-1127.
  65. Sundaram D.S., Kaushik M. and Webster C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: a motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1): 527-531.
  66. Trusov M., Bucklin R.E. and Pauwels K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5): 90-102.
  67. Urry J. (2005). The complexity turn. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(5): 1-14.
  68. Woodside A.G. (2016a). Diffusion and adoption of good science: overcoming the dominant logic of NHST and the reporting of rubbish. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 23(4): 327-333. DOI: 10.1080/1051712X.2016.1258191
  69. Woodside A.G. (2016b). Embrace complexity theory, perform contrarian case analysis, and model multiple realities. In: Woodside A.G. (Ed.). Bad to good: Achieving high quality and impact in your research. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  70. Wu P.-L., Yeh S.-S., Huan T.C. and Woodside A.G. (2014). Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations. Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1647-1670.
  71. Yadav M.S., Pavlou P.A. (2014). Marketing in computer-mediated environments: research synthesis and new directions. Journal of Marketing, 78(1): 20-40.
  72. Yan Q., Zhou S. and Wu S. (2018). The influences of tourists’ emotions on the selection of electronic word of mouth platforms. Tourism Management, 66, 348-363.
  73. Yoo K.H., Gretzel U. (2009). What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews? Information Technology and Tourism, 10(4): 283-295.
  74. Yoo K.H., Gretzel U. (2011). Influence of personality on travel-related consumergenerated media creation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2): 609-621.
  75. You Y., Vadakkepatt G.G. and Joshi A.M. (2015). A meta-analysis of electronic wordof-mouth elasticity. Journal of Marketing, 79(2): 19-39.
  76. Zeithaml V.A. (1981). How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services. In: Donnelly J.H., George W.R. (eds). Marketing of Services. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
  77. Zeithaml V.A., Berry L.L. and Parasuraman A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60: 31-46.
  78. Zhu F., Zhang X. (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2): 133-148.
  79. Wangenheim F.V. (2005). Postswitching negative word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 8(1): 67-78.
  80. Woodside A. G. and Baxter R. (2013). Achieving accuracy, generalization-to-contexts, and complexity in theories of business-to-business decision processes. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3): 382-393.

Ilenia Confente, Ivan Russo, Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A useful methodological tool for research in the social sciences. An example from the online word-of-mouth context in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 4/2018, pp 87-108, DOI: 10.3280/MC2018-004006