The correction of double entry bookkeeping errors in the late 14th century

Journal title CONTABILITÀ E CULTURA AZIENDALE
Author/s Mikhail Kuter, Marina Gurskaya, Ripsime Bagdasaryan
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/1
Language English Pages 24 P. 7-30 File size 451 KB
DOI 10.3280/CCA2019-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

There have been several studies of medieval bookkeeping practices. This paper adds to that literature by focusing on the treatment of errors in the ledger of the Medieval Italian merchant, Francesco di Marco Datini, most of which were for the years 1395-6. The analysis shows that, contrary to the perception in the literature, accountants of that period not only detected errors, but also devised methods to address them that ensured that the overall financial result reflected a fair presentation of what had occurred, and that they did not simply use the account for Profits and losses as an easy outlet in which to record an amount that balanced the books. In addition, the accuracy of individual ledger accounts was not deemed important once they had been balanced, even after errors were detected.

Keywords: Ledger, trial balance, operating income, operating loss, the Profits and Losses account, adjustment entries.

  1. Bariola P. (1897). Storia della ragioneria Italiana. Milano: Ambrosiana.
  2. Bensa E. (1923). Francesco di Marco Datini: discorso detto nell’Aula maggiore del Comune di Prato il dì 21 agosto 1910. Genova: Arti Grafiche Caimo & C.
  3. Archivio di Stato di Prato, Prato, AS, D., Fondaco di Pisa, Company Francesco di Marco Datini e Manno d’Albizo Degli Agli, Libri Grandi, 1394-1395, №. 362
  4. Archivio di Stato di Prato, Prato, AS, D., Fondaco di Pisa, Company Francesco di Marco Datini e Manno d’Albizo Degli Agli, Libri Grandi, 1395-1396, №. 363
  5. Archivio di Stato di Prato, AS, D., Fondaco di Pisa, Company Francesco di Marco Datini e Manno d’Albizo Degli Agli, Memoriale, 1394-1395, №.372
  6. Archivio di Stato di Prato, AS, D., Fondaco di Pisa, Company Francesco di Marco Datini e Manno d’Albizo Degli Agli, Memoriale, 1395-1396, №.373.
  7. Alfieri V. (1891). La partita doppia applicata alle scritture delle antiche aziende mercantili veneziane. Torino: Paravia e Comp.
  8. Аlfieri V. (1911). La partita doppia applicata alle scritture delle antiche aziende mercantili veneziane / V.Аlfieri. – Roma.
  9. Alfieri V. (1922). Commemorazione di Fabio Besta. Città di Castello: Tipografia dell’Unione Arti Grafiche.
  10. Antonelli V., Sargiacomo M. (2015). Alberto Ceccherelli (1885-1958): pioneer in the history of accounting practice and leader in international dissemination. Accounting History Review, 25(2): 121-144.
  11. Bensa E. (1925). Le forme primitive della polizza di carico: ricerche storiche con documenti inediti. Genova: Caimo.
  12. Bensa E. (1928). Francesco di Marco da Prato. Notizie, e documenti sulla mercatura italiana del secolo XIV. Milano: Treves.
  13. Besta F. (1909). La Ragioneria, 2nd Edition (In 3 Volumes), Facsimile Reprint, 2007. Rome: Rirea.
  14. Besta F. (1922). La ragioneria, seconda edizione riveduta ed ampliata col concorso dei professori Vittorio Alfieri, Carlo Ghidiglia, Pietro Rigobon. Parte prima. III. Milano: Vallardi.
  15. Ceccherelli A. (1913). I libri di mercatura della Banca Medici e l’applicazione della partita doppia a Firenze nel secolo decimoquarto. Firenze: Bemporad.
  16. Ceccherelli A. (1914а). Le funzioni contabili e giuridiche del bilancio delle società medievali. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria. 14(8): 371-378.
  17. Ceccherelli A. (1914b). Le funzioni contabili e giuridiche del bilancio delle società medievali (Continuazione e fine). Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria. 14(10): 436-44.
  18. Ceccherelli A. (1939). l linguaggio dei bilanci. Formazione e interpretazione dei bilanci commerciali. Firenze: Le Monnier.
  19. Coleman D. (1987). The Uses and Abuses of Business History. Business History, 29(2): 141-156.
  20. Corsani G. (1922). I fondaci e i banchi di un mercante pratese del Trecento. Contributo alla storia della ragioneria e del commercio. Da lettere e documenti inediti. Prato: La Tipografica.
  21. Christensen J. (2010). Accounting errors and errors of accounting. The Accounting Review, 85(6): 1827-1838.
  22. de Roover R. (1946). The Medici Bank Organization and Management. The Journal of Economic History, 6(1): 24-52.
  23. de Roover R. (1955). New Perspectives on the History of Accounting. The Accounting Review, 30(3): 405-420.
  24. de Roover R. (1956). The development of accounting prior to Luca Pacioli according to the account-books of Medieval merchants. In: Littleton А.С., Yamey B.S., Studies the History of Accounting. London, pp. 114-174.
  25. de Roover R. (1958). The Story of the Alberti Company of Florence, 1302-1348, as Revealed in Its Account Books. The Business History Review, Spring, 32(1): 14-59.
  26. de Roover R. (1971). The organization of trade. In: Postan M.M., Rich E. E. and Miller E. Economic organization and policies in the middle ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Decker S. (2013). The silence of the archives: business history, post-colonialism and archival ethnography. Management & Organizational History, 8(2): 155-173.
  28. Del Lungo I. (1897). Francesco di Marco Datini mercante e benefattore. Prato: Giaclietti.
  29. Goldthwaite R.A. (2015). The Practice and Culture of Accounting in Renaissance Florence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Gurskaya M., Kuter M., Sangster A. (2019). The formation and use of a profit reserve at the end of the 14th century. Working paper.
  31. Jouanique P. (1996). Three medieval merchants: Francesco di Marco Datini, Jacques Coeur and Benedetto Cotrugli. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 6(3): 261-275.
  32. Kuter M., Gurskaya M., Andreenkova A., & Bagdasaryan R. (2017). The early practices of financial statements formation in Medieval Italy. Accounting Historians Journal, 44(2): 17-25.
  33. Lee G.A. (1973). The Development of Italian Bookkeeping 1211-1300. Abacus, 9(2), December.
  34. Lee G.A. (1975). The Concept of Profit in British Accounting, 1760-1900, The Business History Review, 49(1): 6-36.
  35. Lee G.A. (1977). The coming of age of double entry: the Giovanni Farolfi ledger of 1299-1300. The Accountings Historians Journal, 4(2): 79-95.
  36. Littleton A.C. (1966). Accounting evolution to 1900. N.Y.: Russel&Russel.
  37. Littleton A.C. and Yamey B.S. (1956). Studies in the History of Accounting. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, INC.
  38. Livi G. (1910), Dall’Archivio di Francesco Datini mercante pratese. Firenze: F. Lumachi.
  39. Martinelli A. (1974). The Origination and evolution of double entry bookkeeping to 1440. Ph.D. Dissertation, North Texas State University.
  40. Martinelli A. (1977). Notes on the origin of double entry bookkeeping. Abacus, 13(1): 3-27.
  41. Mattessich R. (2008). Two hundred years of accounting research. New York: Routledge.
  42. Melis F. (1950). Storia della Ragioneria. Bologna: Cesare Zuffi, p. 872.
  43. Melis F. (1954). The archives of a fourteenth century merchant and banker: Francesco Di Marco Datini, of Prato. PSL Quarterly Review, 7: 28-29.
  44. Melis F. (1962). Aspetti della vita economica medievale (studi nell’archivio Datini di Prato). Siena: Monte dei Paschi di Siena.
  45. Melis F. (1972). Documenti per la storia economica dei secoli XIII-XVI. Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.
  46. Nicastro S. (1914). L’Archivio di Francesco di Francesco di Marco Datini in Prato. Rocca S. Casciano: L. Cappelli.
  47. Nigro G. (2010). Datini Francesco di Marco: the man the merchant. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  48. Origo I. (1957). The Merchant of Prato, Francesco di Marco Datini. London: J. Cape.
  49. Penndorf B. (1929). Luka Pacioli – Aus seinem Leben. Zeitschrift fur Handelswissencchaft und Handelspraxis, Heft 4.
  50. Peragallo E. (1938). Origin and evolution of double entry bookkeeping. New York: American Institute Publishing Company.
  51. Peragallo E. (1956). Origin of the Trial Balance. The Accounting Review, Jul., 31(3): 389-394.
  52. Rigobon P. (1892). La contabilità di stato nella Repubblica di Firenze e nel Granducato di Toscana. Girgenti: Stamperia Montes.
  53. Sangster A. (2010). Using accounting history and Luca Pacioli to put relevance back into the teaching of double entry. Accounting, Business and Financial History, 20(1): 23-39. DOI: 10.1080/09585200903504215
  54. Sangster A. (2012). Locating the source of Pacioli’s bookkeeping treatise. Accounting Historians Journal, 39(2): 97-110. DOI: 10.2308/0148-4184.39.2.97
  55. Sangster A. (2015). The genesis of double entry bookkeeping. The Accounting Review, 91(1): 299-315.
  56. Sargiacomo M., Servalli S., and Andrei P. (2012). Fabio Besta: Accounting Thinker and Accounting History Pioneer. Accounting History Review, 22(3): 249-267. DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2012.728904
  57. Sokolov Y.V. (1996). Bukhgalterskii uchet: ot istokov do nashikh dnei (Accounting: from the Beginning to the Present Day). Moscow: Audit, YuNITI.
  58. Vigano E. (1968). La technica del bilancio di ificazione nell’opera dei primi trattatisti. Università Degli Studi di Napoli. Istituto di Ragioneria. Napoli: Giannini.
  59. von Gebsattel A. [translator] (1994). Exposition of Double Entry Bookkeeping: Venice 1494 by Pacioli L. In: Yamey B.S. (ed.). Luca Pacioli: Exposition of Double Entry Bookkeeping. Venice: Albrizzi Editore, pp. 35-94.
  60. Wilson C. (1954). The History of Unilever: A Study in Economic Growth and Social Change, 1. London: Unilever.
  61. Yamey B. S. (1947). Notes on the origin of double-entry bookkeeping. The Accounting Review, 22(3): 263-272.
  62. Yamey B. S. (1949). Scientific bookkeeping and the rise of capitalism. The Economic History Review, 1(2-3): 99-113.
  63. Yamey B. S. (1994). Accounting and the rise of capitalism: Further notes on a theme by Sombart. Journal of Accounting Research, pp. 117-136.
  64. Yamey B. S. (2000). The ‘particular gain or loss upon each article we deal in’: an aspect of mercantile accounting, 1300-1800. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 10(1): 1-12.
  65. Yamey B.S. (2005). The historical significance of double-entry bookkeeping: Some non-Sombartian claims. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 15(1): 77-88.
  66. Zerbi T. (1952). Le Origini della partita doppia: Gestioni aziendali e situazioni di mercato nei secoli XIV e XV. Milan: Marzorati.

  • Digital Science 2019 Dmitry Aleinikov, pp.374 (ISBN:978-3-030-37736-6)
  • The Business Needs that Drove the Emergence of Double Entry: In Defense of Pacioli, again … It is Time to Remove Those Dark Glasses Alan Sangster, in Accounting Historians Journal /2022 pp.93
    DOI: 10.2308/AAHJ-2021-022
  • Scientific School of Kuban State university M. M. Gurskaya, E. V. Olomskaya, F. T. Khot, in Accounting. Analysis. Auditing /2023 pp.84
    DOI: 10.26794/2408-9303-2023-10-4-84-96
  • Integrated Science in Digital Age Marina Gurskaya, Mikhail Kuter, Ripsime Bagdasaryan, pp.103 (ISBN:978-3-030-22492-9)

Mikhail Kuter, Marina Gurskaya, Ripsime Bagdasaryan, The correction of double entry bookkeeping errors in the late 14th century in "CONTABILITÀ E CULTURA AZIENDALE" 1/2019, pp 7-30, DOI: 10.3280/CCA2019-001002