Punish with space, reward with space: differentiate and discipline in the geography of prisons

Journal title RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA
Author/s Marco Nocente
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/1
Language Italian Pages 19 P. 35-53 File size 146 KB
DOI 10.3280/RGI2020-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The space and the relationship between power and punishment in prisons have been analyzed through a dialogue between the theory of Carceral Geography and a differentiated material of contributions and analysis around the Italian detention condition. The dimension that is observed is the space, which is considered in relation to the "premiality" and differentiation. Within these analyses emerge some key-elements such as collaboration and inscrutability that characterize the articulation of some instruments of power such as isolation and transfer.

Keywords: Space, differentiation, prison.

  1. Agamben G. (1995). Homo sacer. Torino: Einaudi.
  2. Bennett J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
  3. Camp J.T. e Heatherton C. (2016). Policing the Planet: Why the Policing Crisis Led to Black Lives Matter. London and Brooklyn, New York: Verso Books.
  4. Campbell E. (2012). Transgression, affect and performance: Choreographing a politics of urban space. British Journal of Criminology, 53: 18-40.-- https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs055
  5. Castel R. (1981). La gestion des risques: de l’anti-psychiatrie a l’apres-psychanalyse. Paris: Minuit.
  6. Chantraine G. (2008). The Post-Disciplinary Prison. Carceral Notebooks, 4: 55-76. -- Testo disponibile al sito: www.thecarceral.org/cn4_chantrain.pdf
  7. Cohen S. (1979). The Punitive City: Notes on the Dispersal of Social Control. Contemporary Crises, 3: 339-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00729115
  8. Collettivo O. (2017). Il 41 bis compie 31 anni. Milano.
  9. Comfort M. (2008). Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of Prison. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. -- https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226114682.001.0001
  10. D’Este R. (1990). Carcere: il coraggio necessario per la sua abolizione. In: Unknown, a cura di, Victor Hugo, Oscar Wilde, Michel Foucault, Rete Evasioni, Alfredo M. Bonanno, Riccardo D’Este. Editrice Cirtide, 103-108. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://editricecirtide.noblogs.org/files/2015/03/carcere_web.pdf
  11. De Feo P. (2016). Le Cayenne italiane. Pianosa e Asinara: il regime di torture del 41 bis. L’evasione possibile. Roma: Edizione Sensibili Alle Foglie.
  12. Feeley M.S. (1992). The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications. Criminology, 30: 449-474. -- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
  13. Foster R. (2017). Exploring ‘Betwixt and Between’ in a Prison Visitors’ Centre and Beyond. In: Moran D. e Schliehe A., a cura di, Carceral Spatiality: Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 168-198.
  14. Foucault M. (1976). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard (trad. it.: Sorvegliare e Punire. Torino: Einaudi. -- Testo disponibile in: www.ristretti.it/areestudio/cultura/libri/sorvegliare_e_punire.pdf).
  15. Id. (2015). The Punitive Society: Lectures at the College de France 1972-1973, a cura di Harcourt B.E. London: MacMillan, Palgrave.
  16. Id. (2015°). Prigioni e rivolte nelle prigioni. In: Unknown, a cura di, Victor Hugo, Oscar Wilde, Michel Foucault, Rete Evasioni, Alfredo M. Bonanno, Riccardo D’Este. Editrice Cirtide, 87-92.
  17. Gill N., Conlon D., Moran D. e Burridge A. (2016). Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography, 42, 2: 183-204. doi : 10.1177/0309132516671823, phg.sagepub.com
  18. Gormley C. (2017). An Extended Social Relational Approach to Learning Disability Incarcerated. In: Moran D. e Schliehe A., a cura di, Carceral Spatiality: Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 43-74.
  19. Harvey D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  20. Hayward K. (2012). Five spaces of cultural criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 52: 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs008
  21. Hubbard P. (2001). Sex Zones: Intimacy, Citizenship and Public Space. Sexualities 4: 51-71. Sage Publications. -- Testo disponibile in: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/136346001004001003
  22. Jefferson A.M. (2014). Conceptualizing confinement: Prisons and poverty in Sierra Leone. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14, vol. 1: 44-60. https://doi.
  23. org/10.1177/1748895812462593
  24. Jewkes Y. e Moran D. (2014). Should prison architecture be brutal, bland or beautiful?
  25. Scottish Justice Matters, 2, vol. 1: 8-11. Testo disponibile in: http://pure-oai.bham.ac.uk/ws/files/14791865/SJM_2_1_PrisonArchitectureLo_Res.pdf
  26. Kaminski D. (2006). Un nouveau sujet de droit penal. In: COLLECTIF, a cura di, La responsabilite et la responsabilisation dans la justice penale. Bruxelles: De Boeck & Larcier, Perspectives criminologiques.
  27. Kindynis T. (2014). Ripping up the map: Criminology and cartography reconsidered. British Journal of Criminology, 54, n. 2: 222-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt077
  28. Kropotkin P. (2014). Le prigioni e la loro influenza morale sui prigionieri. In: Capuano R.G., a cura di, Anarchia e prigioni, Scritti sull’abolizione del carcere. Aprilia: Ortica Editrice societa cooperativa, 7-20.
  29. Latour B. (1999). When Things Strike Back. British Journal of Sociology, 51, n. 1: 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358453
  30. Milhaud O. (2017). Separer et punir. Une geographie des prisons francaises. Paris: CNRS Editions.
  31. Moran D., Piacentini L. e Pallot J. (2013). Liminal transCarceral space: Prison transportation for women in the Russian Federation. In: Moran D., Gill N. e Conlon D., a cura di, Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention. London: Routledge, 109-126.
  32. Ead. e Schliehe A. (2017). Introduction: Co-production and Carceral Spatiality. In: Moran D. e Schliehe A, a cura di, Carceral Spatiality: Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-10.
  33. Ead., Turner J. e Schliehe A. (2018). Conceptualizing the Carceral in Carceral Geography. Progress in Human Geography, 42(5): 666-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517710352
  34. Mountz A. e Briskman L. (2012). Introducing island detentions: The placement of asylum seekers and migrants on islands. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 6, n. 2: 21-26.
  35. O’Malley P. (1992). Risk, Power and Crime Prevention. Economy and Society, 21, n. 3: 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149200000013
  36. Panizzari G. (2017). L’albero del peccato. Paderno Dugnano (Mi): Colibri Edizioni.
  37. Scheer D. e Lorne C. (2017). Illusions of Utopia: When Prison Architects (Reluctantly) Play Tetris. In: Moran D. e Schliehe A, a cura di, Carceral Spatiality: Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 113-134.
  38. Tewksbury R. e DeMichele M. (2005). Going to Prison: A Prison Visitation Program. The Prison Journal, 85, 3: 292-310. -- https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505279525
  39. Turner J. (2017). The Artistic ‘Touch’: Moving Beyond Carceral Boundaries Through Art by Offenders. In: Moran D. e Schliehe A., a cura di, Carceral Spatiality: Dialogues Between Geography and Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 135-168.
  40. Tyner J. (2013). Population geography: Surplus populations. Progress in Human Geography 37, 5: 701-711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512473924
  41. Wacquant L. (2013). Iperincarcerazione. Neoliberismo e criminalizzazione della poverta negli Stati Uniti. Verona: Ombre Corte.

  • Spazio, diritto e la loro relazione: percorso e confini della legal geography Ettore Asoni, in RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA 1/2024 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/rgioa1-2024oa17374

Marco Nocente, Punire con lo spazio, premiare con lo spazio: differenziare e disciplinare nella geografia delle prigioni in "RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA" 1/2020, pp 35-53, DOI: 10.3280/RGI2020-001002