Power, control and subjectivity in digital food delivery platforms: a Foucaultian analysis of the Latin American app Rappi

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Federico De Stavola
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/158 Language Italian
Pages 21 P. 178-198 File size 253 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2020-158009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article aims to analyze the power assemblage and the forms of subjectifica-tion presented in the Latin American food delivery app Rappi, based on a research realized in Buenos Aires and Mexico City. The conceps of discipline, governa-mentality and technologies of the self are used in order to analyze the digital plat-form and the systems of administration of the workforce in the enlarged coopera-tion; on the other hand, it will be analyzed the way they structure the working re-lationship and the subjectivity of the worker on the model of self-entrepreneurship. This analysis aims to propose the concept of functional auton-omy, which could be deepened in future research on the topic.

Keywords: Labour, discipline, platform capitalism, Latin America

  1. Antunes R. (2018). O privilégio da servidão: o novo proletariado de serviço na era digital. Sao Paulo: Boitempo editorial.
  2. Antunes R. (2020). El Nuevo Proletariado de Servicios. Revista Del Observatorio Internacional De Salarios Dignos, 1(02), 182-192.
  3. Briziarelli M. (2020). Translatability, Translational Labor and Capitalist Subsumption: The Communicative Venues of Capitalism. Democratic Communiqué, 29(1): 46-61.
  4. Bustos A. A., Velásquez C. J. (2019). Rappi el tránsito de un sueño a súper app. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Testo disponibile al sito [15/10/18]: hdl.handle.net/10554/46706
  5. Connelly C.E., Fieseler C., Černe M., Giessner S.R. e Wong S.I. (2020). Working in the digitized economy: HRM theory & practice. Human Resource Management Review: 100762.
  6. de Krijger F. (2019). Free to Enjoy a Precarious Ride: On Entrepreneurial Game Playing in the Platform-Based Food Delivery Sector. Master thesis, Utrecht School of Governance. -- Testo disponibile al sito [08/04/20]: dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/388987
  7. De Stavola F. (2020). Piattaforme, riders e America Latina: Rappi in Messico. In: Pirone M., Cuppini N., Frapporti M., Benvegnù C., Milesi F., a cura di, Logistica e America Latina: Saggi di Bidaseca, Brighenti, De Ambroggi, De Stavola, Peregalli, Peterlongo, Valz Gris. Postfazione di Sandro Mezzadra. Bologna: Dipartimento delle Arti.
  8. De Stefano V. (2016), The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the “gig-economy”, Geneva: ILO.
  9. Dinero (2019). Rappi espera cerrar el año con 300 cocinas ocultas propias. Dinero. Testo disponibile al sito [09/05/20]: dinero.com/tecnologia/articulo/rappi-esta-construyendo-300-centros-de-cocinas-ocultas/272948
  10. Ferlito S. (2018). Sharing economy ovvero il frutto avvelenato del neoliberismo. CALUMET. -- Testo disponibile al sito [13/05/20]: www.windogem.it/calumet/upload/pdf/mat_74.pdf
  11. Fiocco L. (1997). L’effetto Kanban nell’organizzazione del lavoro alla Fiat di Melfi. Chaos, 10: 23-45.
  12. Foucault M. (1976). Sorvegliare e punire. Nascita della prigione. Torino: Einaudi Editore, 1975.
  13. Foucault M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4): 777-795.
  14. Foucault M. (1992). Tecnologie del sé, Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1982.
  15. Foucault M. (2001). Defender la sociedad. Curso en el Collège de France (1975-1976) (2nd ed.). Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1997.
  16. Foucault M. (2012). Nascita della biopolitica. Milano: Feltrinelli, 2004.
  17. Gago V. (2014). La razón neoliberal. Economías barrocas y pragmática popular. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
  18. Ghincea M. (n.d.). The Panopticon and the Sharing Economy: Self-Regulation and Discipline in Neoliberalism. -- Testo disponibile al sito [13/05/20]: academia.edu/35741706/The_Panopticon_and_the_Sharing_Economy_Self-Regulation_and_Discipline_in_Neoliberalism
  19. Haggerty K.D., Ericson R.V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4): 605-622. DOI: 10.1080/0007131002001528
  20. Into the Black Box (2018). Manifesto di critica logistica. Zappruder, 46: 134-143.
  21. Kozinets R.V. (2015). Netnography. The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, 1-8.
  22. Largacha M.C., Tatis G. (2017). BIG DATA, la solución para las plataformas de domicilios. Biblioteca Digital – CESA. Testo disponibile al sito [15/10/18]: hdl.handle.net/10726/1687
  23. Leghissa G. (2008). Il modello dell’impresa e le radici della governamentalità biopolitica. In: Demichelis L., Leghissa G., Biopolitiche del lavoro. Milano: Mimesis.
  24. Macherey P. (2013). Il soggetto produttivo: da Foucault a Marx. Verona: Ombre corte.
  25. Marini R.M. (1973). Dialéctica de la dependencia. In: Martins C.E., a cura di (2008), América Latina, dependencia y globalización. Fundamentos conceptuales Ruy Mauro Marini. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre.
  26. Marx K. (1975). Il capitale. Critica dell’economia politica. Libro Primo. Torino: Einaudi.
  27. Mazzotti M. (2015). Per una sociologia degli algoritmi. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia 3(4): 465-78. DOI: 10.1423/8180
  28. Mezzadra S., Neilson B. (2019). The politics of operations: excavating contemporary capitalism, Durham-London: Duke university press.
  29. Modonesi M. (2010). Subalternidad, antagonismo, autonomía. Buenos Aires: CLACSO-Prometeo Libros.
  30. Moore P.V., Joyce S. (2020). Black box or hidden abode? The expansion and exposure of platform work managerialism. Review of International Political Economy, 27(4): 926-948. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2019.162756
  31. Munro I. (2014). Organizational Ethics and Foucault’s ‘Art of Living’: Lessons from Social Movement Organizations. Organization Studies, 35(8): 1127-1148. DOI: 10.1177/017084061453091
  32. Neffa J. C. (2009). Sector informal, precariedad, trabajo no registrado. In Noveno Congreso Nacional de Estudios del Trabajo, Buenos Aires. -- Testo disponibile al sito [13/05/20]: www.aset.org.ar/congresos/9/Ponencias/p8_Neffa.pdf
  33. Negri S. (2019). ¿Cómo es trabajar en una plataforma de delivery? Aproximaciones de una investigación preliminar. XIII Jornadas de Sociología. Buenos Aires: UBA.
  34. Nun J. (1969). Superpoblación relativa, ejercito industrial de reserva y masa marginal. Revista Latinoamericana de Sociología Del Centro de Investigaciones Sociales Del Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, 5(2): 1-43.
  35. Ojeda D. (2018). ¿Por qué Rappi vale US$1.000 millones si genera pérdidas?, El espectador. Testo disponibile al sito [09/05/20]: -- elespectador.com/economia/por-que-rappi-vale-us1000-millones-si-genera-perdidas-articulo-811192
  36. Quijano A. (1972). La Constitución del “Mundo” de la Marginalidad Urbana. EURE- Revista de Estudios Urbano Regionales, 2(5): 89-106.
  37. Raffnsøe S., Mennicken A., Miller P. (2019). The Foucault Effect in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 40(2): 155-182. DOI: 10.1177/017084061774511
  38. Rappi (2018). ¡Las 8 cosas más raras pedidas por Rappi! Blog de Rappi. Testo disponibile al sito [15/10/18]: blog.rappi.com/cosas-raras-pedidas-por-rappi
  39. Rappi (2020). RappiPuntos: mejores oportunidades para los mejores Rappitenderos. Blog de Rappi. Testo disponibile al sito [15/7/20]: -- blog.soyrappi.com/rappipuntos-bog/
  40. Sailer M., Hense J.U., Mayr S.K., e Mandl H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69: 371-380.
  41. Schrape N. (2014). Gamification and governmentality. In Fuchs M., Fizek S., Ruffino P. e Schrape N., a cura di, Rethinking gamification. Lüneburg: Meson Press.
  42. Sewell G., Wilkinson B. (1992). Someone to watch over me: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process. Sociology, 26(2): 271-289.
  43. Sewell G. (2001). Controllo, resistenze e soggettività. In: Cavazzani, A., Fiocco L., e Sivini G. a cura di, Melfi in Time. Potenza: Consiglio Regionale di Basilicata.
  44. Sivini G. (2001). Le relazioni di potere e la fabbrica snella: un approccio foucaultiano. In: Cavazzani A., Fiocco L. e Sivini G., a cura di. Melfi in Time. Potenza: Consiglio Regionale di Basilicata.
  45. Spradley J.P. (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich College Publisher.
  46. Srnicek N. (2018). Capitalismo De Plataformas. Buenos Aires: Caja Negra Editora.
  47. Tassinari A., Maccarrone V. (2020). Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1): 35-54. DOI: 10.1177/095001701986295
  48. Taylor P., Bain P. (1999). “An assembly line in the head”: Work and employee relations in the call centre. Industrial Relations Journal, 30(2): 101-117. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2338.0011
  49. Thompson P. (2002). Fantasy Island: A Labour Process critique of the ‘age of surveillance’. Surveillance & Society, 1(2): 138-151.
  50. Veen A., Barratt T. e Goods C. (2019). Platform-Capital’s ‘App-etite’ for Control: A Labour Process Analysis of Food-Delivery Work in Australia. Work, Employment and Society. DOI: 10.1177/095001701983691
  51. Villadsen K., (2007). Managing the employee's soul: Foucault applied to modern management technologies. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 5(1): 01-10. DOI: 10.1590/S1679-3951200700010000
  52. Wacquant L. (2019). Por una Sociología de carne y sangre. Revista Del Museo De Antropología, 12(1): 117-124.
  53. Woodcock J. (2020). The algorithmic panopticon at Deliveroo: Measurement, precarity, and the illusion of control, Ephemera. -- Testo disponibile al sito [13/05/20]: ephemerajournal.org/contribution/algorithmic-panopticon-deliveroo-measurement-precarity-and-illusion-control.
  54. Woodcock J., Johnson M.R. (2018). Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The sociological Review, 66(3): 542-558. DOI: 10.1177/003802611772862
  55. Yin R.K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
  56. Zangaro M. (2011). Subjetividad y trabajo: el management como dispositivo de gobierno. Trabajo y Sociedad, XV (16): 163-177. Testo disponibile al sito [13/05/20]: redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=387334688010
  57. Žižek S. (2003). El sublime objeto de la ideología. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores, 1989.

  • El general intellect en bicicleta. Un análisis del trabajo de repartidores de plataformas de delivery de Buenos Aires, Argentina Andrea Fagioli, in Razón Crítica /2022
    DOI: 10.21789/25007807.1750
  • The employee paradigm towards proof of work via digital platforms: The situation of Italian platform workers Giacomo Pisani, in Oñati Socio-Legal Series /2023 pp.1903
    DOI: 10.35295/osls.iisl.1768

Federico De Stavola, Potere, controllo e soggettività nelle piattaforme digitali di food delivery: un’analisi foucaultiana dell’app latinoamericana Rappi in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 158/2020, pp 178-198, DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-158009