Unique, remote and vulnerable: the need of nature in insular regions’ geo-graphy

Journal title RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA
Author/s Stefano Malatesta
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 37-52 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rgioa2-2021oa12031
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The essay discusses the need of an idea of nature supporting the construction of islands as exceptional places. This theoretical argumentation is developed mainly referring to the so-called island studies. The paper points out the relationship between nature and the categories of insularity (vulnerability, uniqueness and isolation), then proposes some models of islands that may materialize this relationship. Nature and society are presented as a dialectic duo, to show how insularity is the product of cultural and political processes based on the separation between human and natural.

  1. Armstrong H.W., Giordano B., Kizos T., Macleod C., Olsen L.S. e Spilanis I. (2012). The European Regional Development Fund and Island Regions: An Evaluation of the 2000-06 and 2007-13 Programs. Island Studies Journal, 7, 2: 177-198.
  2. The European Regional Development Fund and Island Regions: An Evaluation of the 2000-06 and 2007-13 Programs. Island Studies Journal, 7, 2: 177-198.
  3. Baldacchino G. (2004). The Coming of Age of Island Studies. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 95, 3: 272-283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2004.00307.x
  4. Id. (2012a). Meeting the test of time. Small States in the 21st Century. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 15, 1: 14-25.
  5. Id. (2012b). The Lure of the island: A spatial analysis of power relations. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 1: 55-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.imic.2012.11.003
  6. Id. (2013). Island landscapes and European culture: An ‘island studies’ perspective. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 2: 13-19.
  7. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 2: 13-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.imic.2013.04.001
  8. Bohle J. e Littschwager M. (2015), Caribbean Entanglements. Culture(s) and Nature Revisited. Fiar, 8, 3: 4-19.
  9. Bonati S., Tononi M. e Zanolin M. (2021). Social nature geographies/Geografie sociali della natura. Rivista Geografica Italiana, 127(2): 5-20.
  10. Carlsen J. e Butler R. (2011). Introducing Sustainable Perspective. In: Carlsen J. e Butler R., a cura di, Island tourism: towards a Sustainable perspective. London: CABI, 1-8.
  11. Castree N. (2005). Nature. London: Routledge.
  12. Id. e Braun B. (2011). Social Nature: Theory. Practice and Politics. Oxford: Malden.
  13. Cavallo F. (2007). Isole al bivio, Minorca tra balearizzazione e valore territoriale. Milano: Unicopli.
  14. Conrad J. (1917). The Shadow-Line. A Confession. New York: Doubleday, Page & Company (trad. it.: La linea d’ombra. Firenze: Giunti, 2001).
  15. Cosgrove D. (1990). Realtà sociali e paesaggio simbolico. Milano: Unicopli.
  16. dell’Agnese E. (2018). ‘One island, one resort’. Il turismo enclave alle Maldive come eterotopia pianificata. Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, 14, 1: 27-39. DOI: 10.13128/bsgi.v1i1.87
  17. Faggi P. e Turco A. (1999). Conflitti ambientali. Genesi, sviluppo, gestione. In: Faggi P. e Turco A., a cura di, Conflitti ambientali. Genesi, sviluppo, gestione. Unicopli: Milano, 7-75.
  18. Gillis J.R. (2014). Not continents in miniature: islands as ecotones. Island Studies Journal, 9, 1: 155-166.
  19. Grydehøj A. (2017). A future of island studies. Island Studies Journal, 12, 1: 3-16. DOI: 10.24043/isj.1
  20. Hay P. (2006). A Phenomenology of Islands. Island Studies Journal, 1, 1: 19-42.
  21. Hayward P. (2012). Aquapelagos and aquapelagic assemblages. Towards an integrated study of island societies and marine environments. Shima, The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 6, 1: 1-11.
  22. Hennessy E. e McCleary A.L. (2011). Nature’s Eden? The Production and Effects of ‘Pristine’ Nature in the Galápagos Islands. Island Studies Journal, 6, 2: 131-156.
  23. Huxley A. (1962). Island. London: Chatto & Windus.
  24. Jeffery L. (2013). ‘We are the true guardians of the environment’: human-environment relations and debates about the future of the Chagos Archipelago. J Roy Anthropol Inst, 19: 300-318. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.12034
  25. Kelman I. (2007). Sustainable Livelihoods from Natural Heritage on Islands. Island Studies Journal, 2, 1: 101-114.
  26. King R.S. (2016). Island Bodies: Transgressive Sexualities in the Caribbean magination. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  27. Krishnakumar M.V. (2009). Development or Despoliation? The Andaman Islands under colonial and postcolonial regimes. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 3, 2: 104-117.
  28. Malatesta S. e Cavallo F. (2019). Studi insulari in geografia. Oltre l’isolamento e la vulnerabilità. Introduzione. In: Salvatori F., a cura di, L’apporto della geografia tra rivoluzioni e riforme. Atti del XXXII Congresso Geografico Italiano. Roma: A.Ge.I., 2893-2895.
  29. Marine Conservation Institute. Marine Protection Atlas. www.mpatlas.org/mpa/sites/7707499 (consultato il 29 giugno 2020).
  30. Massey D. (2005). For Space. London: SAGE.
  31. Mathis A. e Rose J. (2016). Balancing tourism, conservation, and development: a political ecology of ecotourism on the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Ecotourism, 15, 1: 64-77. DOI: 10.1080/14724049.2015.1131283.
  32. McCall G. (1994). Nissology: A Proposal for Consideration. Journal of the Pacific Society. 17, 2-3: 1-8.
  33. Id. (1996). Clearing Confusion in a Disembedded World: The Case for Nissology. Geographische Zeitschrift, 84, 2: 74-85.
  34. Minca C. (2009). The island: Work, tourism and the biopolitical. Tourist Studies, 9, 2: 88-108. DOI: 10.1177/1468797609360599
  35. Persoon G.A. e van Weerd M. (2006). Biodiversity and Natural Resource Management in Insular Southeast Asia. Island Studies Journal, 1, 1: 81-108.
  36. Ratter B. (2018). Geography of small islands. Outpost of Globalisation. Cham: Springer.
  37. Saarinen J. (2017). Enclavic tourism spaces: territorialisation and bordering in tourism destination development and planning. Tourism Geographies, 19, 3: 425-437. DOI: 10.4324/9781315083742-7.
  38. Schmidt di Friedberg M., Malatesta S. e Pecorelli V. (2015). Le Maldive: pratiche miti e immaginari del paradiso terrestre. In: Martinez de Pison E. e Ortega Cantero R., a cura di, El paisaje: de los exploradores a los turistas. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid y Fundación Duques de Soria, 205-227.
  39. Seetah K. (2010). ‘Our Struggle’ Mauritius: an Exploration of Colonial Legacies on an ‘Island Paradise’. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 4, 1: 99-112.
  40. Stratford E. (2015). Critical analysis of the impact of Island Studies Journal: retrospect and prospect. Island Studies Journal, 10, 2: 139- 162.
  41. Id., Baldacchino G., McMahon E., Farbotko C. e Harwood A. (2011). Envisioning the Archipelago. Island Studies Journal, 6, 2: 113-130.
  42. Turco A. (1980). Insularità e modello centro-periferia. L’ isola di Creta e le relazioni con l’esterno. Milano: Unicopli.
  43. Turri E. (1998). Il paesaggio come teatro. Padova: Marsilio.

Stefano Malatesta, Uniche, remote e vulnerabili: il ‘bisogno di natura’ nella geo-grafia delle regioni insulari in "RIVISTA GEOGRAFICA ITALIANA" 2/2021, pp 37-52, DOI: 10.3280/rgioa2-2021oa12031