Perceiving change, perceiving continuity: notes on self-analysis

Journal title PSICOTERAPIA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Adriana Gagliardi
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2 Language Italian
Pages 23 P. 29-51 File size 229 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSP2021-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The author tackles the problem of the analyst’s subjectivity, in par-ticular his self-analysis, which is fundamental for understanding the difference between the derivatives of the unconscious (repressed and not repressed) of the patient and that of the analyst. Over the past 20 years, the functioning of the analyst’s mind has been observed more systematically. Self-analysis goes beyond the transference and counter-transference dimension, if it does include it, for each patient. Counter-transference reactions are often experienced with particular intensity: a signal that elicits a response in the analyst that originates from a partic-ular experience of his, which must be deepened through self-analysis, and which sometimes requires a discussion with colleagues to under-stand its meaning. The problem of the analyst’s subjectivity raises a question about psychoanalysis as a science; the psychoanalytic meth-od, transversal to the many theories, is the element that allows to detect clinical data and allows a comparison within the scientific community to which it belongs, even with the theoretical-technical differences through which it is used. The work of self-analysis involves a knowledge of the technical-theoretical evolution of psychoanalysis, proceeds through an inductive method. The analyst’s implicit and ex-plicit theories are integrated with his ability to understand and listen to what emerges from the psychoanalytic process and change over time. We look at transference and repetition as a possibility to open up to new transformative and vital experiences. For self-analysis, a particular way of listening to the repetition of particular aspects in the transfer-ence is proposed, transference-countertransference segments are iden-tified, in order to use a method that can make clearer a difference be-tween what concerns the patient’s experiences, from those of the ana-lyst. Three explanatory clinical flashes are also described of the evolu-tion of some of the author’s reference theories over time.

Keywords: self-analysis, subjectivity, psychoanalytic method, transfer-ence, countertransference, explicit/implicit analyst’s theories.

  1. Bollas C. (1989). Forze del destino. Milano: Raffello Cortina, 2021.
  2. Bolognini S. (2002). L’Empatia Psicoanalitica. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  3. Bolognini S. (2015). Psicoanalisi in un mondo che cambia. Relazione presentata al Convegno Nazionale SIPP. Bologna 4-5 dicembre 2015.
  4. Bolognini S. (2021). Inconscio nascosto, Inconscio sepolto, Inconscio implicito. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, LXVII, 2, 363-378. DOI: 10.26364/RPSA20210670363
  5. Busch F. (2019). The Analyst’s Reveries-Explotations in Bion’s Enigmatic concept. London: Routledge.
  6. Civitarese G. (2021). Cosa vuol dire “giocare” in analisi? Psicoterapia Psicoanalitica, XXVIIl, 1, 33-55. DOI: 10.3280/PSP2021-001003
  7. Conrotto F. (2010). Per una teoria psicoanalitica della conoscenza. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  8. Di Chiara G. (2003). Curare con la psicoanalisi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  9. Ferruta A. (a cura di) (2008). I Transfert. Cambiamenti nella pratica clinica. Roma: Borla.
  10. Ferruta A. (2021). Ermes. Comunicare con le dimensioni inconsce della psiche. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, LXVII, 2, 347-362. DOI: 10.26364/RPSA20210670347
  11. Freud S. (1912a). Dinamica della traslazione. OSF, 6.
  12. Freud S. (1912b). Consigli al medico nel trattamento analitico. OSF, 6.
  13. Gagliardi A. (2008). Sul metodo: un confronto tra psicoanalisi e neuroscienze. In Nicoletti R., Lavadas E., Tabossi P. (a cura di). Attenzione e Cognizione. Bologna: Il Mulino, 113-122.
  14. Gagliardi A. (2010). Forse non è la neuropsicoanalisi il sogno di Freud fatto realtà. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, XXXVII, 1, 57-64.
  15. Gagliardi A. (2017). Controtransfert, tempo e attenzione fluttuante. Psicoterapia Psicoanalitica, XXIV, 1, 11-29. DOI: 10.3280/PSP2017-00100
  16. Hampe M. (2003). Pluralità delle scienze e unità della ragione. In Leuzinger-Bohleber M., Dreher A.U., Canestri J. (a cura di) (2008). Pluralismo e unità? Metodi di ricerca in psicoanalisi. Roma: Borla, 54-68.
  17. Heimann P. (1950). On countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 31, 81-84.
  18. Joseph B. (1989). Equilibrio e cambiamento psichico. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1991.
  19. Kandel E.R. (1999). Biology and Future of Psychoanalysis: a New Intellectual Framework for Psychiatry Revisited. American J. Psychiatry, 156, 505-524.
  20. Kandel E.R. (2001). The Molecolar Biology of Memory Storage: a Dialogue between Genes e Synapses. Science, 294, 1030-38.
  21. Khun T. (1962). La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche. Torino: Einaudi, 1987.
  22. Mancia M. (2004). Sentire le parole. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  23. Modell A. (1990). Per una teoria del trattamento psicoanalitico. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1994.
  24. Ogden T. (2016). Vite non vissute. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  25. Perner J., Ruffman T. (1995). Episodic Memory and Autonoetic Consciousness: Developmental Evidence and a Theory of Childhood Amnesia. Journal exper. Child Psychology, 59, 516-548.
  26. Popper K. (1934). Logica della scoperta scientifica. Torino: Einaudi, 1970.
  27. Racker H. (1957). Il significato e l’impiego del controtransfert. In Studi sulla tecnica psicoanalitica. Roma: Armando, 1968, 171-229.
  28. Rocha Barros E. M. (2002). An Essay on dreaming. Psysical Working out and Working Through. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 1083-1093. DOI: 10.1516/E57V-RPQY-EKNY-2AJJ
  29. Russo L. (1998). Sul controtransfert. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 44, 2, 283-294.
  30. Russo L. (2003). Autoanalisi controtransfert. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 49, 2, 283-294.
  31. Sasso G.P. (2021). The unification of Psychoanalytic Models and Psychoanalisysis Neurosciences Interface. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 102, 68-90. DOI: 10.1080/00207578.2020.181981
  32. Siegel S.J. (1999). La mente relazionale. Neurobiologia dell’esperienza interpersonale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2001.
  33. Turillazzi Manfredi S. (1994). Le certezze perdute della psicoanalisi clinica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  34. Vigna-Taglianti M. (2021). Il pezzo mancante: sulle tracce di una metapsicologia. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, LXVII, 2, 327-346. DOI: 10.26364/RPSA20210670327
  35. Winnicott D.W. (1947). L’odio nel controtransfert. In Dalla pediatria alla psicoanalisi. Firenze: Martinelli, 1975, 332-350.

Adriana Gagliardi, Percepire il cambiamento, percepire la continuità: note sull’autoanalisi in "PSICOTERAPIA PSICOANALITICA" 2/2021, pp 29-51, DOI: 10.3280/PSP2021-002003