Formative evaluation to support the development of the deep dimension of acting with competence. A case study

Journal title EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
Author/s Teresa Grange, Salvatore Patera
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2
Language Italian Pages 15 P. 47-61 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12430
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The study of the latent processes underlying learning questions the didactic action for the promotion of learning experiences raising awareness of one’s own growth paths. Formative evaluation plays a strategic role with respect to both the accessibility and critical elaboration of the different levels and ways of learning: an in-depth study of formative evaluation practices in learning contexts aimed at promoting competent action offers a contribution to pedagogical reflection about an enabling and emancipating evaluation’s culture. Starting from a case study in the context of a university course, it will be discussed how formative evaluation can be used to explore and relate the functioning modes of people with their possible areas of development in order to promote acting with competence in both formative and life contexts.

Keywords: ; formative evaluation; deep learning; competences

  1. Allal L. (1999). Impliquer l’apprenant dans les processus d’évaluation: promesses et pièges de l’autoévaluation. In: Depover C. and Noël B., editors, L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs: modèles, pratiques et contexts. Brussels: De Boeck.
  2. Argyris C. and Schön D.A. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effec-tiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  3. Bateson G. (1977). Verso un’ecologia della mente. Milano: Adelphi.
  4. Boshier R, Collins J.B. (1985). The Houle Typology After Twenty-Two Years: A Large-Scale Empirical Test. Adult Education Quarterly, 35(3): 113-130, DOI: 10.1177/0001848185035003001.
  5. Bruner J.S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  6. Creswell J.W. (2015). 30 Essential Skills for the Qualitative Researcher. London: Sage Publications.
  7. Dewey J. (1938). Esperienza ed educazione, trad.it. 1949 Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  8. European Union (2018). EntreComp: The European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, testo dis-ponibile al sito:https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8201&furtherPubs=yes (15-07-2021).
  9. Fabbri L., Melacarne C., Striano M. (2008). L’insegnante riflessivo. Coltivazione e trasformazione delle pratiche professionali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Giannandrea L. (2011). Valutazione come formazione. Pratiche di promozione dell’identità personale e professionale per docenti e studenti. Education Sciences & Society, 2(2): 109-119.
  11. Grange T. (2006). Il laboratorio come luogo di costruzione di competenze. In: Paparella N., Perucca A., a cura di, Le attività di laboratorio e di tirocinio nella formazione universitaria, vol II. Roma: Armando.
  12. Grange T. (2014). Ricerca educativa e pratica professionale: una prospettiva dialogica. In: Corsi M., a cura di, La ricerca pedagogica in Italia. Tra innovazione e internazionalizzazione. Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
  13. Hadji C (2012). Faut-il avoir peur de l’évaluation?. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
  14. Hautamäki J. and Kupiainen S. (2014). Learning to learn in Finland. Theory and pol-icy, research and practice. In: Deakin Crick R., Stringher C. and Ren K., editors, Learning to learn International perspective from theory and practice. London: Routledge.
  15. Heritage M. (2007). Formative Assessment: What Do Teachers Need to Know and Do?. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2): 140-145.
  16. Kuckartz U. (2014). Qualitative Text Analysis. A Guide to Methods, Practice and Us-ing Software. London: Sage Publications.
  17. Lave J., Wenger E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Laveault D. (1999). Autoévaluation et régulation des apprentissages. In: Depover C. and Noël B., editors, L’évaluation des compétences et des processus cognitifs: modèles, pratiques et contextes. Brussels: De Boeck.
  19. Le Boterf G. (2000). Construire les compétences individuelles et collectives. Paris: Éditions d’Organisation.
  20. Mezirow J. (1991). Transformative dimension of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  21. Nussbaum M.C. (2012). Creare capacità. Liberarsi dalla dittatura del Pil. Bologna: il Mulino.
  22. Paparella N. (2012). L’agire didattico. Napoli: Guida.
  23. Patera S. (2020a). Partecipazione e dialogo interculturale. In Bochicchio F., Traverso A. (a cura di) Didattica interculturale. Criteri, quadri, contesti e competenze. Lecce: Libellula University Press.
  24. Patera S. (2020b). L’esplorazione delle pratiche pedagogico-didattiche dei docenti. La ricerca di Guayaquil (Ecuador). In Ellerani P., Patera S. (2020). Il modello peda-gogico-didattico “espansivo” delle scuole salesiane in Ecuador. Una ricerca culturale sulle pratiche quotidiane dei docenti. Dall’implicito all’esplicito. Roma: Armando.
  25. Patton M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  26. Pellerey M. (2004). Le competenze individuali e il Portfolio. Milano: RCS Libri.
  27. Rivoltella P.C., Rossi P.G., a cura di, (2012). L’agire didattico. Manuale per l’insegnante. Brescia: La Scuola.
  28. Seale C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
  29. Striano M., Melacarne C. e Oliverio S. (2018). La riflessività in educazione. Prospettive, modelli, pratiche. Brescia: Scholè.
  30. Timmis S., Broadfoot P., Sutherland R., and Oldfield A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3): 454-476. DOI: 10.1002/berj.3215.
  31. Varela F.J., Thompson E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  32. Vertecchi B. (1999). Decisione didattica e valutazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  33. Vygotskji L.S. (1934). Pensiero e linguaggio, trad. it 1990 (L. Mecacci, trad.). Roma-Bari: Editori Laterza.

  • La didattica universitaria gamificata: un modello di valutazione partecipata Barbara Bruschi, Manuela Repetto, Melania Talarico, in EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY 1/2023 pp.46
    DOI: 10.3280/ess1-2023oa15295
  • Disponibilità emozionale dell'insegnante, didattica inclusiva e cultura dell'affettività a scuola Francesco Paolo Romeo, in EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY 2/2022 pp.297
    DOI: 10.3280/ess2-2022oa14333
  • Valutare la formazione esperienziale. Il caso "Sentirsi in alto mare" Andrea Tarantino, Ezio Del Gottardo, Salvatore Patera, in EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY 1/2023 pp.118
    DOI: 10.3280/ess1-2023oa15393

Teresa Grange, Salvatore Patera, La valutazione formativa per sostenere lo sviluppo della dimensione profonda dell’agire competente. Un caso di studio in "EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY" 2/2021, pp 47-61, DOI: 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12430