Legal and eco-sustainable development in disadvantaged rural areas of southern Italy: the role of social enterprises

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Author/s Luca Fazzi
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/126
Language Italian Pages 18 P. 27-44 File size 193 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2021-126002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this article is to analyze empirically the role that the social entreprises plays within a wider strategy for local development in the rural areas of southern Italy affected by the presence of organized crime and consequent widespread underdevelopment. The research is based on 20 in-depth interviews with leading actors of social agriculture in four regions: Puglia, Calabria, Campania and Sicily. The findings shows that social enterprises are relevant actors for change and social and economic development in the disvantaged rural areas. The research also shed light on several political, organizational and contextual factors that are of importance in enabling social enterprises to promove local development and in particular the role of competencies and public policies.

Keywords: local development, social enterprise, disadvantaged rural areas, social economy, community, rural

  1. Apostolopoulos N., Ratten V., Stavroyiannis S., Makris I., Apostolopoulos S., Liargovas P. (2020). Rural health enterprises in the EU context: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 14(4): 563-582. DOI: 10.1108/JEC-04-2020-0070
  2. Ascione E., Scornaienghi M. (2009). L’agricoltura legale: i terreni agricoli confiscati alla criminalità organizzata. QA, 3: 153-173. DOI: 10.3280/QU2009-003008
  3. Avola M. (2017). Il dualismo Nord-Sud. In Barbera F., Pais I. (a cura di). Fondamenti di sociologia economica. Milano: Egea.
  4. Borzaga C., Defourny J. (2001). Conclusions: social enterprises in Europe: a Diversity of initiatives and prospects. In Borzaga C., Defourny J. (eds.). The Emergence of Social Enterprise. London-New York: Routledge.
  5. Borzaga C., Fazzi L. (2004). Il ruolo del terzo settore. In Gori C. (a cura di). La riforma dei servizi sociali in Italia. L’attuazione della legge 328 e le sfide future. Roma: Carocci.
  6. Borzaga C., Fazzi L., Galera G. (2016). Social enterprise as a bottom-up dynamic: part 1. The reaction of civil society to unmet social needs in Italy, Sweden and Japan. International Review of Sociology, 26(1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2016.1148332
  7. Carrosio G. (2019). I margini al centro. L’Italia delle aree interne tra fragilità e innovazione. Roma: Donzelli.
  8. Ciaccio G. (2009). La criminalità organizzata nelle regioni meridionali: effetti sullo sviluppo economico e sul costo dei servizi pubblici locali. Economia Pubblica, 1-2: 91-114. DOI: 10.3280/EP2009-001004
  9. Colozzi I., Bassi A. (2011). Da terzo settore a imprese sociali. Roma: Carocci.
  10. Corrado A. (2012). Ruralità differenziate e migrazioni nel Sud Italia. Agriregionieuropa, 28: 72-76.
  11. Dayson C. (2013). Understanding the place based social value created by new-start social enterprises: Evidence from ten rural UK communities. People, Place and Policy, 7(1): 30-45.
  12. De Vivo C., Giarè F., Borsotto P., Gaito M. (2018). Una fotografia dell’agricoltura sociale in Italia. Agriregionieuropa, 54.
  13. Di Iacovo, O’Connor (eds.). Supporting policies for social farming in Europe: progressing multifunctionality in responsive rural areas. Firenze: LTD.
  14. Elsen S. (2018). Eco-Social Transformation and Community-Based Economy. London: Routledge.
  15. Fazzi L. (1996). Social policies and the non-profit sector in Italy: A critique of the ideologies of contracting out. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 17(1): 75-97. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X96171004
  16. Fazzi L. (2011a). Imprenditori social innovatori. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  17. Fazzi L. (2011b). Social Co-operatives and Social Farming in Italy. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(2): 119-136.
  18. Garrow E., Hasenfeld Y. (2014). Social Enterprises as an Embodiment of a Neoliberal Welfare Logic. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(11): 1475-1493. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214534674
  19. Hassik J. (2009). Social farming across Europe: overview. In Di Iacovo F., O’Connor D. (eds.). Supporting policies for social farming in Europe: progressing multifunctionality in responsive rural areas. Firenze: Arsia.
  20. Mair J., Battilana J., Cárdenas J. (2012). Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3): 353-373.
  21. Meijer M. (2020). When it goes wrong ... learning from challenged (and revived) community initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 74(1): 1-9.
  22. Mosca M. (2018). The Social Regeneration of Mafia Assets in the Land of Gomorrah. The role of social cooperatives. In Sacchetti S., Christoforou A., Mosca M. (eds.). Social Regeneration and Local Development. Cooperation, Social Economy and Public Participation. London: Routledge.
  23. Parkinson C., Howorth C. (2008). The language of social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(3): 285-309. DOI: 10.1080/08985620701800507
  24. Richter R. (2019). Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 70: 179-187.
  25. Robert T., Levente A. (2017). Social innovations for the disadvantaged rural regions: Hungarian experiences of the new type social cooperatives. Eastern European Countryside, 23(1): 27-49.
  26. Russo A. (2016). Il problema dello sviluppo economico nel Mezzogiorno tra razionalità individuale e scelte pubbliche. Rivista Trimestrale di Scienza dell’Amministrazione, 3: 1-35.
  27. Segre E., Zamaro N. (2016). Su alcune determinanti della diffusione e della performance delle istituzioni nonprofit. In Barbetta G., Ecchia G., Zamaro N. (a cura di). Le istituzioni nonprofit in Italia. Dieci anni dopo. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Steiner A., Farmer J., Bosworth G. (2019). Rural social enterprise - Evidence to date, and a research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 70: 139-143.
  29. Steiner A., Teasdale S. (2019). Unlocking the potential of rural social enterprise. Journal of Rural Studies, 70: 144-154.
  30. Testi E., Bellucci M., Franchi S., Biggeri M. (2017). Italian social entreprises at the crossroads: their role in the evolution of the welfare state. Voluntas, 28(6): 2403-2422.
  31. van Twuijver M., Olmedo L., O’Shaughnessy M., Hennessy T. (2020). Rural Social Enterprises in Europe: a Systematic Literature Review. Local Economy, 35(2): 121-142. DOI: 10.1177/0269094220907024
  32. Viganò F., Musolino D. (2020). Agricoltura sociale come politica di sviluppo per le aree svantaggiate. Il caso del Mezzogiorno e della Calabria. In Elsen S., Angeli S., Berhard A., Nicli S. (a cura di). Prospettive dell’agricoltura sociale con particolare riferimento allo sviluppo in Italia. Bolzano: Bolzano University Press.

Luca Fazzi, Sviluppo legale ed ecosostenibile nelle aree rurali svantaggiate del sud Italia: il ruolo delle imprese sociali in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 126/2021, pp 27-44, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2021-126002