The creation of a permanent laboratory of urban regeneration. An action-research path in the aurora neighborhood of turin

Journal title ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE
Author/s Sara Mela
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/3 Language Italian
Pages 11 P. 91-101 File size 261 KB
DOI 10.3280/ES2021-003007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper presents some considerations developed as a result of an action-research work carried out by a group of researchers and professors of the Polytechnic and the University of Turin, in the Aurora neighbourhood of Turin. The paragraphs 1 and 2 contain a theoretical reflection on the theme of urban regeneration as a practice aimed at the creation of a social infrastructure that identifies public space as the backbone of a variety of services co-designed by citizens. The paragraph 3 presents the results of a campaign of interviews with privileged witnesses and describes the process that, following the health emergency caused by the spread of the pandemic, led to the creation of a coordination of over 40 active organizations in Aurora (citizens’ committees, associations, neighborhood centers, etc.) aimed at creating a permanent laboratory for the neighbourhood regeneration.

Keywords: Grassroots Regeneration, Social Infrastructure, Transdisciplinary Research, Gentrification

Jel codes: R0, Z1

  1. Amin A. (2014). Lively Infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7-8): 137-161. DOI: 10.1177/0263276414548490
  2. Arena G., Iaione C. (2015), L’età della condivisione. La collaborazione tra cittadini e amministrazione per i beni comuni. Roma: Carocci.
  3. Cabodi C., Caruso N., Mela S., Pede E., Rossignolo C., Saccomani S. (2020). Aurora: a sud di Torino nord. Torino: Dipartimento Interateneo di Scienze, Progetto e Politiche del Territorio - Politecnico di Torino.
  4. Caruso N. (2020). Dalla rigenerazione al riuso temporaneo: pratiche di trasformazione della città contemporanea. In: Albano R., Mela A., a cura di. La città agita. Nuovi spazi sociali tra cultura e condivisione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Davico L., Debernardi L., Gullino V., Novascone R., Staricco L., Vitale Brovarone E. (2017). Recuperare la rotta. Diciottesimo Rapporto “Giorgio Rota” su Torino. Torino: Centro Einaudi.
  6. Costa G., Stroscia M., Zengarini N., Demaria M. (2017). 40 anni di salute a Torino. Spunti per leggere i bisogni e i risultati delle politiche. Milano: Inferenze.
  7. Graham S., Marvin S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism. Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
  8. Hirsch Hadorn G., Hoffmann-Riem H., Biber-Klemm S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy W., Joye D., Pohl C., Wiesmann U., Zemp E. (2008). Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Berlin: Springer.
  9. Istat (2011). Censimento della popolazione e delle abitazioni. Roma: Istat.
  10. Iveson K. (2013). Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3): 941-56. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12053
  11. Klinenberg E. (2018). Places for the people: how social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. London: Penguin.
  12. Labsus (2019). Voci in comune. Le parole chiave dell’amministrazione condivisa. -- <https://www.labsus.org/2019/03/voci-in-comune-le-parole-chiave-della mministrazione-condivisa/>.
  13. Lang D.J., Wiek A., Bergmann M., Stauffacher M., Martens P., Moll P., Swilling M., Thomas C.J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7: 25-43.
  14. Lathnam A., Layton J. (2019). Social infrastructure and the public life of cities: studying urban sociality and public spaces. Geography Compass, 13:e12444.
  15. Lees L. (2012). The geography of gentrification: thinking through comparative urbanism. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2): 155-171. DOI: 10.1177/0309132511412998.
  16. Lees L. (2019). Planetary gentrification and urban (re)development. Urban Development Issues, 61: 5-13.
  17. Lees L., Shin H.B., Lopez-Morales E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  18. Lydon M., Bartman D., Woudstra R., Khawarzad A. (2011), Tactical Urbanism: Shot-term action for Long-term change. New York: The Street Plans Collaborative.
  19. Moreno C., Allam Z., Chabaud D., Gall C., Pratlong F. (2021), Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4: 93-111.
  20. Ostanel E. (2017). Spazi fuori dal comune. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Oswald F., Baccini P. (2003). Netzstadt: Designing the Urban. Basel: Birkhauser.
  22. Pohl C., Hirsch Hadorn G. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Munich: oekom. DOI: 10.14512/9783962388638
  23. Star S.L. (1999). The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3): 377-391. DOI: 10.1177/00027649921955326
  24. Talen E. (2019). Neighbourhoods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Vandini, L. (2013). Small scale intervention. Il ruolo della piccola scala nella rigenerazione urbana. Planum - The Journal of Urbanism, 27(2).
  26. Warf B. (2003). Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures,Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(1): 246-247. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8306.93121
  27. Zask J. (2011). Participer. Enquêtes sur les formes démocratiques de la participation. Lormont: Le Bord de l’eau.

Sara Mela, La creazione di un laboratorio permanente di rigenerazione urbana. Un percorso di ricerca-azione nel quartiere aurora di Torino in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 3/2021, pp 91-101, DOI: 10.3280/ES2021-003007