Social innovation, political activism and solidarity: insights from the pandemic crisis

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Maria Dodaro, Carlotta Mozzana, Marcello Anselmo
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/99
Language English Pages 6 P. 61-66 File size 166 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2021-099009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article investigates the relationship between social innovation, solidarity and experiences of socio-political activism at the urban level by researching local responses to the social crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic in Milan and Naples. The study analyses the role of some urban self-organised groups against the social effects of isolation and the dynamics of de-politicisation and re-politicisation underlying the governance of the emergency. In addition, it highlights how the extent of the crisis can, on the one hand, push towards unprecedented coalitions potentially able to re-politicise local governance and, on the other, promote a convergence towards the logic of the ‘post-welfare city’, which risks neutralising the innovative effect of the transformations.

Keywords: social solidarity; social innovation; pandemic

  1. Benassi D., 2019, «Il governo del sistema di assistenza sociale in una prospettiva di lungo periodo». In: Andreotti A. (ed.), Governare Milano nel nuovo millennio. Bologna: il Mulino.
  2. Bifulco L., 2017, Social Policies and Public Action. New York: Routledge. Bifulco L., Dodaro M., 2018, «Local Welfare Governance and Social In- novation. The Ambivalence of the Political Dimension». In: Frey A., Eraydin K. (eds.), Politics and Conflict in Governance and Planning. New York: Routledge.
  3. Bifulco L., Dodaro M., Mozzana C., 2022, «Welfare locale e innova- zione sociale alla prova dell’emergenza». Polis, 1: 105-134. DOI: 10.1424/103560
  4. Borrelli N., Mela A., 2019, Lo spazio del cibo. Un’analisi sociologica. Roma: Carocci.
  5. Bosi L., Zamponi L., 2019, Resistere alla crisi. I percorsi dell’azione sociale diretta. Bologna: il Mulino.
  6. Busso S., De Luigi N., 2019, «Civil society actors and the Welfare State. A historically-based analytical framework». Partecipazione e conflitto, 12, 2: 259-296.
  7. Castel R., 2004, L’insicurezza sociale. Che significa essere protetti? Torino: Einaudi.
  8. Cattivelli V., Rusciano V., 2020, «Social Innovation and Food Provisioning during Covid-19: The Case of Urban–Rural Initiatives in the Province of Naples». Sustainability, 12, 11: 1-15.
  9. Costa G., Cucca R., Torri S., 2016, «Milan: A City Lost in the Transition from the Growth Machine Paradigm towards a Social Innovation Ap- proach». In: Brandsen A., Cottacin T., Evers S., Zimmer A. (eds.), Social Innovation in the Urban Context. New York: Springer.
  10. De Leonardis O., 2011, «Dividing or Combining Citizens. The Politics of Active Citizenship in Italy». In: Newman, Tonkens (2011).
  11. DeVerteuil G., 2016, Resilience in the Post-welfare Inner City. Bristol: Policy Press.
  12. Eizaguirre S., Pradel M., Terrones A., Martinez-Celorrio X., García M., 2012, «Multilevel governance and social cohesion». Urban Studies, 4, 9: 1999-2016. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012444890
  13. Fougère M., Segercrantz B., Seeck H., 2017, «A critical reading of the Euro- pean Union’s social innovation policy discourse: (Re)legitimizing neo- liberalism». Organization, 1, 25: 1-25. DOI: 10.1177/1350508416685171.
  14. Hay C., 2007, Why We Hate Policy? Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. Horton R., 2020, «Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic». The Lancet, 396 (10255), 874.
  16. istat, 2020, Rapporto Annuale 2020. La situazione del paese. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
  17. istat, 2021, Rapporto Annuale 2021. La situazione del paese. Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica.
  18. Kazepov Y., Saruis T., Colombo F., 2019, «Consolidating Social Innova- tion». In: Oosterlynck, Novy, Kazepov (2019).
  19. Moulaert F., MacCallum D., 2019, Advanced Introduction to Social Inno- vation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  20. Moulaert F., MacCallum D., Mehmood A., Hamdouch A., 2013, The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research. Cheltenham (uk)- Northamp- ton (usa): Edward Elgar Publishing.
  21. Moulaert F., Martinelli F., Swyngedouw E., González S., 2005, «Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation». Urban Studies, 42, 11: 1969- 1990.
  22. Mudu P., 2004, «Resisting and Challenging Neoliberalism. The De- velopment of Italian Social Centres». Antipode, 36, 5: 917-41.
  23. Newman J., 2007, «The «Double Dynamics» of Activation: Institu- tions, Citizens and the Remaking of Welfare Governance». Inter- national Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27: 364-375. DOI: 10.1108/01443330710822066
  24. Newman J., Tonkens E., 2011, Participation, Responsibility and Choice. Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  25. Oosterlynck S., Novy A., Kazepov Y., 2019, Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion. A critical appraisal. Bristol-Chicago: Policy Press.
  26. Ostanel E., 2021, «Can Social Innovation Transform Local Governments? The Experience of Naples». In: Fregolent L., Nel·lo O. (eds.), Social Movements and Public Policies in Southern European Cities. New York: Springer.
  27. Pavolini E., Sabatinelli S., Vesan P., 2021, «I servizi di welfare in Italia alla prova della pandemia. Uno sguardo di insieme». Politiche Sociali, 2: 211-232. DOI: 10.7389/101678
  28. Peck T., 2001, Workfare State. New York: The Guilford Press.
  29. Pradel M., Cano-Hila A.B., García M., 2020, Urban Governance and Social Innovation. Citizenship, Civil Society and Social Movements. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  30. Riches G., 2011, «Thinking and acting outside the charitable food box: hunger and the right to food in rich societies». Development in Practice, 21: 768-75. DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2011.561295
  31. Sampugnaro R., Santoro. P., 2021. «The Pandemic Crisis, Italian Munici- palities, and Community Resilience». PArtecipazione e Conflitto, 14, 1: 283-301.
  32. Saraceno C., Benassi D., Morlicchio E., 2020, Poverty in Italy. Features and Drivers in a European Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
  33. Vicari Haddock S., Moulaert F., 2009. Rigenerare La città. pratiche di innovazione sociale nelle città europee. Bologna: il Mulino

  • Co-produzione urbana e sistemi di governo del territorio in Europa Francesca Bragaglia, Erblin Berisha, Giancarlo Cotella, Umberto Janin Rivolin, in TERRITORIO 106/2024 pp.83
    DOI: 10.3280/TR2023-106011

Maria Dodaro, Carlotta Mozzana, Marcello Anselmo, Social innovation, political activism and solidarity: insights from the pandemic crisis in "TERRITORIO" 99/2021, pp 61-66, DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-099009