From criticism of protocols to criticism of the diagnostic practice. The sociological contribution to psychiatric practice in an age of mental illness epidemics

Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Enrico Caniglia
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/1
Language English Pages 14 P. 58-71 File size 371 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2023-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper discusses the role that sociological reflection can play in learning and improving knowledge in the field of mental health care. Two different positions within sociology will be discussed. The first one, taken from a constructionist perspective, interprets the role of sociology as a critical instance and highlights how the adoption of rigid formal protocols in psychiatry has hindered and endangered the autonomy and necessary discretion of clinicians at the moment of diagnosis. The second position, which takes an ethnomethodological point of view, holds instead that it is pointless to focus on formal protocols because concrete diagnostic practice consists of other procedures, not at all comparable to the official ones described by the DSM. For ethnomethodology, the contribution of sociology is not to add sociological knowledge to psychiatric knowledge, but to make the real resources and competences of clinical work explicit.

Keywords: mental illness; DSM; epidemics; diagnostic practice; medicalization; ethnomethodology.

  1. Bruchmüller K., Margraf J., Schneider S. (2012). Is ADHD diagnosed in accord with diagnostic criteria?. Journal of Consultant Clinic Psychology, 80(1):128-138.
  2. Conrad P. (2005). The Shifting Engines of Medicalization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46: 3-14. DOI: 10.1177/00221465050460010
  3. Conrad P. (2007). The Medicalization of Society. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  4. Conrad P., Schneider J. (1992). Deviance and Medicalization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  5. Dominici P. (2016). Dentro la società interconnessa. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  6. DSM 5 (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association.
  7. Foucault M. (1961). Folie et deraison. Histoire de la folie à l’age classique. Paris: Plion.
  8. Giddens A. (1990). The Consequence of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  9. Goffman E. (1961). Asylum. Anchor Books.
  10. Halpin M. (2014). The DSM and Professional Practice: Research, Clinical, and Institutional Perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 57(2): 153-167. DOI: 10.1177/002214651664563
  11. Hartnett D. N., Nelson J., Rinn A. (2004). Gifted or ADHD? The Possibilities of Misdiagnosis. Roeper Review, 26(2): 73-76. DOI: 10.1080/0278319040955424
  12. Heritage J., Maynard D. (eds.) (2005). Communication in Medical Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Horwitz A. (2002). Creating Mental Illness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  14. Horwitz A., Wakefield D. (2007). The Loss of Sadness. How Psychiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow into Depressive Disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Insel T. (2014). The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: precision medicine for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(4): 395-397.
  16. Jutel A. (2009). Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(2): 278-299.
  17. Leo J. (2000). Attention Deficit Disorder. Good Science or Good Marketing?. Skeptic, 8(1): 63-69.
  18. Lynch M. (1982). “Turning up Signs” in Neurobehavioral Diagnosis. Symbolic Interaction, 7(2): 67-86.
  19. Lynch M. (1995). Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Mayes M., Horwitz A. (2005). DSM-III and the Revolution in the Classification of Mental Illness. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(3): 249-267.
  21. McHoul A., Rapley M. (2005). A Case of Attention-Deficit/Hypercativity Disorder Diagnosis: Sir Karl and Francis B. slug it out on the Consulting Room Floor. Discourse and Society, 16(3): 419-449. DOI: 10.1177/095792650505117
  22. Merten E.C., Cwik J. C., Margraf J., Schneider S. (2017). Overdiagnosis of Mental Disorders in Children and Adolescents. Child Adolescent Psychiatry Mental Health, 11(5): 1-11.
  23. Mika E. (2006). Giftedness, ADHD and Overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 28(4): 237-242. DOI: 10.1080/0278319060955437
  24. Mullet D.R., Rinn A.N. (2015). Giftedness and ADHD: Identification, Misdiagnosis, and Dual Diagnosis. Roeper Review, 37: 195-207. DOI: 10.1080/02783193.2015.107791
  25. Palmer D. (2000). Identifying delusional discourse: Issues of rationality, realty and power. Sociology of Health & Illness, 22(5): 661-678. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.0022
  26. Rosenhan D. (1973). On Being Sane in Insane Places. Science, 179: 250-258.
  27. Smith D. (2014). The Diminished Resistance to Medicalization in Psychiatry: Psychoanalysis Meets the Medical Model of Mental Illness. Society and Mental Health, 4(2): 75-91. DOI: 10.1177/215686931351221
  28. Whooley O. (2010). Diagnostic Ambivalence: Psychiatric Workaround and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(3): 452-469.
  29. Whooley O. (2016). Measuring Mental Disorders: The Failed Commensuration Project of DSM-5. Social Sciences & Medicine, 166: 33-40.
  30. Wilson M. (1993). DSM-III and the Transformation of American Psychiatry: A History. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(3): 399-410.
  31. Zadra E. et al. (2020). Survey on centres and procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD in public services in Italia. Rivista di psichiatria, 55(5): 355-365. DOI: 10.1708/3503.3489

Enrico Caniglia, From criticism of protocols to criticism of the diagnostic practice. The sociological contribution to psychiatric practice in an age of mental illness epidemics in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2023, pp 58-71, DOI: 10.3280/SES2023-001005