Utilising Digital Badges in Higher Education. A Pilot Case Study Analysing their Influence on University Students

Journal title EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Author/s Federica Pelizzari, Simona Ferrari
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/1
Language Italian Pages 15 P. 65-79 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa1-2025oa20582
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The use of digital badges in education has gained popularity in recent years, offering a novel way to recognize and certify students’ competences and learning outcomes. These badges are akin to physical awards, but they can be shared online, making them accessible to potential employers and higher education institutions. A significant feature of digital badges is the detailed description of skills they represent, which enhances their transparency and value. Research has delved into the benefits and challenges of implementing digital badges, examining their impact on student motivation, learning, assessment, and best practices in design and implementation. Digital badges provide immediate feedback, thus promoting engagement and participation. They can also be “open” or “stackable,” motivating students to pursue long-term learning goals. However, the implementation of digital badges presents challenges. To ensure integrity, digital badges must have clear and reliable criteria, and stakeholders should validate their design. Good practices include student involvement in design, collaboration with industry experts, and the use of reliable technologies. This case study, as part of a master’s degree program, found that students questioned the value of badges, emphasizing that they require teacher emphasis to be motivating and do not necessarily reflect skills attained. This study aligns with students’ preference for learning without the need for tangible rewards, highlighting how badges can be complementary but not essential to the learning process. The research indicates the importance of further evaluation and improvement of digital badge implementation to maximize their educational impact.

Keywords: ; Digital badge; higher education; competences; lifelong learning; open learning

  1. Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D. K. (2016). Foundation of digital badges and micro-credentials. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  2. Abramovich, S. (2016). Understanding digital badges in higher education through assessment. On the Horizon, 24(1), 126-131.
  3. Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 217-232.
  4. Alt, D. (2023). Who benefits from digital badges? Motivational precursors of digital badge usages in higher education. Current Psychology, 42(8), 6629-6640.
  5. Besser, E. D., & Newby, T. J. (2019). Exploring the role of feedback and its impact within a digital badge system from student perspectives. TechTrends, 63, 485-495.
  6. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.) (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. NY: Routledge.
  7. Carey, K. L., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2018). An exploration of the utility of digital badging in higher education settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 1211-1229.
  8. Cheng, Z., Watson, S. L., & Newby, T. J. (2018). Goal setting and open digital badges in higher education. TechTrends, 62, 190-196.
  9. Chukowry, V., Nanuck, G., & Sungkur, R. K. (2021). The future of continuous learning–Digital badge and microcredential system using blockchain. Global Transitions Proceedings, 2(2), 355-361.
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective. In Building autonomous learners: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (pp. 9-29). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  11. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological bulletin, 125(6), 627.
  12. Dyjur, P., & Lindstrom, G. (2017). Perceptions and uses of digital badges for professional learning development in higher education. TechTrends, 61(4), 386-392.
  13. Ellis, L. E., Nunn, S. G., & Avella, J. T. (2016). Digital badges and micro-credentials: Historical overview, motivational aspects, issues, and challenges. Foundation of digital badges and micro-credentials: Demonstrating and recognizing knowledge and competencies, 3-21.
  14. Fanfarelli, J. R., & McDaniel, R. (2019). Designing effective digital badges: Applications for learning. NY: Routledge.
  15. Fields, E. (2015). Making visible new learning: Professional development with open digital badge pathways. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 10(1).
  16. Frederiksen, L. (2013). Digital badges. Public Services Quarterly, 9(4), 321-325.
  17. Gamrat, C., Zimmerman, H. T., Dudek, J., & Peck, K. (2014). Personalized workplace learning: An exploratory study on digital badging within a teacher professional development program. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1136-1148.
  18. Gibson, D., Ostashewski, N., Flintoff, K., Grant, S., & Knight, E. (2015). Digital badges in education. Education and Information Technologies, 20, 403-410.
  19. Hurst, E. J. (2015). Digital badges: Beyond learning incentives. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 12(3), 182-189.
  20. Jones, W. M., Hope, S., & Adams, B. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of digital badges as recognition of professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 427-438.
  21. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2020). Dyadic data analysis. NY: Guilford Publications.
  22. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (Eds.) (2016). Digital badges in education: Trends, issues, and cases. NY: Routledge.
  23. Newby, T. J., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Instructional digital badges: Effective learning tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1053-1067.
  24. Ostashewski, N., & Reid, D. (2015). A history and frameworks of digital badges in education. In T. Reiners, & L. C. Woods (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 187-200). NY: Springer.
  25. Rivoltella, P. C. (2013). Fare didattica con gli EAS. Episodi di Apprendimento Situato. Brescia: La scuola.
  26. Rughinis, R. (2013). Talkative objects in need of interpretation. Re-thinking digital badges in education. In CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2099-2108).
  27. Shields, R., & Chugh, R. (2017). Digital badges – Rewards for learning?. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 1817-1824.
  28. Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Extrinsic rewards undermine altruistic tendencies in 20-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1785.
  29. Zhou, L., Chen, L., Fan, Q., & Ji, Y. (2019). Students’ perception of using digital badges in blended learning classrooms. Sustainability, 11(7), 2151.

Federica Pelizzari, Simona Ferrari, Utilising Digital Badges in Higher Education. A Pilot Case Study Analysing their Influence on University Students in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2025, pp 65-79, DOI: 10.3280/exioa1-2025oa20582