Presupposti culturali nella formulazione delle domande di medici ginecologi a pazienti migranti

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Marilena Fatigante
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/1 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 17 P. 44-60 Dimensione file 123 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2013-001005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The paper presents analyses conducted on a corpus of (audio) recorded and fully transcribed doctor-patient interactions with native and non native patients, carried on in a outward department of Obstetrics and Gynechology in a public hospital in Italy. The focus is on the doctors’ strategies employed to elicit information from the patients with particular regards to the patient’s job status and the likelihood that she continues to work during pregnancy. Applying CA principles to the analysis of both the sequential structure and the design of the question, the author highlights how the activity of questioning about the patient’s job includes larger sequences with non native patients as compared to native patients, in which not only the patient’s physical conditions but also her juridical status is questioned. The paper finally discusses the implications of the analyses on the doctors’ training on one hand, and on the social representation of the migrant identity on the other.;

Keywords:Domande, paziente non nativa, stato lavorativo, gravidanza, Analisi Conversazionale (AC)

  1. Stivers T., Majid A. (2007). Questioning children: Interactional evidence of implicit bias in medical interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 4: 424-441
  2. Todd A.D. (1989). Intimate adversaries: Cultural conflicts between doctors and women patients. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
  3. West C. (1984). Routine Complications: Troubles with Talk Between Doctors and Patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
  4. Stivers T., Heritage J. (2001). Breaking the sequential mold: Answering “more than the question” during comprehensive history taking. Text, 21, 1-2: 151-185
  5. Sorjonen M.L., Raevarra L. Haakana M., Tammi T., and Perakyla A. (2006). Lifestyle Discussions in Medical Interviews. In: Heritage J. and Maynard D., editors, Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. New York: Cambridge University Press, 340-78
  6. Schegloff E.A. (1972). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. In: Gumperz J. and Hymes D., editors Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 346-80
  7. Sacks H., Schegloff E.A. and Jefferson G. (1974). A symplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, 50, 4: 696-735
  8. Pomerantz A.M. (1984). Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In: Atkinson P. and Heritage J., editors, Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57-101
  9. Pilnick A., Hindmarsh J. and Gill V. (2009). Beyond ‘doctor and patient’: Developments in the study of healthcare interactions. Sociology of Health and Illness 31, 6: 787-802
  10. Parsons T. (1951). The Social System. New York: The Free Press
  11. Orletti F. (2000). La conversazione diseguale. Roma: Carocci
  12. Mishler E.G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation
  13. Margutti P., Galatolo R. (questo volume). Forme di riduzione dell’asimmetria nella comunicazione medico-paziente: le iniziative dei pazienti nel corso di visite specialistiche
  14. Linell P., Luckmann T. (1991). Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries. In: Marková I., and Foppa K., editors, Asymmetries in Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1-20
  15. Jefferson G. (1989). Preliminary Notes on a Possible Metric which Provides for a ‘Standard Maximum’ Silence of Approximately one Second in Conversation. In: Roger D., and Bull P., editors, Conversation. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 166-196
  16. Heritage J. (1984). A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement. In: Atkinson P. and Heritage J., editors, Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 299-345
  17. Heritage J., Maynard D. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of doctorpatient interaction: 30 years of research in primary care. Annual Review of Sociology. 32: 351-374
  18. Heritage J. (2010). Questioning in Medicine. In: Freed A. and Ehrlich S., editors, “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 42-68
  19. Heritage J., Raymond G. (in press). Navigating epistemic landscape: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In: de Ruiter J.P., editors, Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  20. Heath C. (1992). The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation. In: Drew P. and Heritage J., editors, Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 235-67
  21. Haakana M. (2001). Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text, 21, 1-2: 187-219
  22. Gill teas V., Halkowski T. (questo volume) Conversation Analysis and Ethnomethodology: the centrality of interaction
  23. Fisher S., Todd A.D., editors, (1986). Discourse and institutional authority: Medicine, Education and Law. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
  24. Fasulo A. (2009). Domande che cominciano per ‘ma’ e per ‘e’. ‘L’epistemica debole’ della conversazione. In: Fatigante M., Mariottini L. e Sciubba M.E., a cura di, Lingua e Società. Saggi in onore di Franca Orletti. Roma: Franco Angeli, 25-45
  25. Drew P., Heritage J., editors (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
  26. Byrne P., Long B. (1976). Doctors Talking to Patients. London: DHSS
  27. Boyd E., Heritage J. (2006). Taking the Patient’s Medical History: Questioning During Comprehensive History Taking. In: Heritage J. and Maynard D., editors, Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Interculturality in Institutions Carlo Orefice, Alessandra Romano, pp.41 (ISBN:978-3-031-12625-3)
  • Interculturality in Institutions Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio, Francesca Alby, pp.161 (ISBN:978-3-031-12625-3)

Marilena Fatigante, Presupposti culturali nella formulazione delle domande di medici ginecologi a pazienti migranti in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2013, pp 44-60, DOI: 10.3280/SES2013-001005