Mezzi di comunicazione di massa e pluralismo: un approccio economico

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE
Autori/Curatori
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 27 P. 43-69 Dimensione file 183 KB
DOI 10.3280/POLI2013-003002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The paper reviews the ongoing economic literature on media markets but with a sharp focus on the pluralism issue. The authors start with the basic economic model to describe how the media market functions and then use the model to illustrate the key economic contributions according to the two-sided market, media bias and media capture. Finally the paper addresses the pluralism issue, incorporating both the provision of and the demand for information.;

Keywords:Mercato dei media, pluralismo

Jel codes:D80, L82, Z10

  1. Ambrus a., Reisinger M. 2005. platform competition and welfare: media markets reconsidered, mimeo.
  2. Anderson S., Coate S. 2005. Market provision of broadcasting: a welfare analysis. Review of Economic Studies, 72 (4): 947-972, DOI: 10.1111/0034-6527.00357
  3. Anderson S., Gabszewicz J. 2005. The media and advertising: a tale of two-sided markets, in Ginsburgh V., Throsby D. (eds.) Handbook of Cultural Economics. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
  4. Anderson S., Mclaren J. 2010. Media mergers and media bias with rational consumers.
  5. CEPR Discussion Paper 7768.
  6. argentesi e., Filistrucchi l. 2007. estimating market power in a two-sided market: the case of newspapers. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (7): 1247-1266, DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
  7. Armstrong M. 2006. Competition in two-sided markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 37 (3): 668-691.
  8. Armstrong M., Weeds H. 2007. program quality in subscription and advertising-funded television, mimeo.
  9. Bagwell K. 2007. The economic analysis of advertising. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3: 1701-1844, DOI: 10.1016/S1573-448X(06)03028-7
  10. Baron D.P. 2006. persistent media bias. Journal of Public Economics, 90 (1-2): 1-36, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.10.006
  11. Battaggion M.R., Vaglio a. 2012a. The market for news: a demand-oriented analysis. Economia Politica, 1: 81-110.
  12. Battaggion M.R., Vaglio a. 2012b. pin-ups and journalists: a model of media market with news and entertainment, mimeo.
  13. Becker G.S., Murphy K.M. 1993. a simple theory of advertising as a good or bad. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (4): 941-964, DOI: 10.2307/2118455
  14. Besley T., Prat A. 2006. Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? media capture and government accountability. America Economic Review, 96 (3): 720-736, DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.3.720
  15. Brown K., Alexander P. 2005. Market structure, viewer welfare, and advertising rates in local broadcasting television markets. Economics Letters, 86 (3): 331-337, DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.09.001
  16. Brown K., Cavazos R. 2005. Why is this show so dumb? advertising revenue and program content of network television. Review of Industrial Organization, 27 (1): 17-34, DOI: 10.1007/s11151-005-4836-6
  17. Brunetti a., Weder B. 2003. a free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87 (7): 1801-1824, DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00186-4
  18. Caillaud B., Jullien B. 2001. Competing cybermediaries. European Economic Review, 45 (4-6): 797-808, DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00123-4
  19. Caillaud B., Jullien B. 2003. Chicken & egg: competition among intermediation service providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34 (2): 309-328, DOI: 10.2307/1593720
  20. Chan J., Suen W. 2008. a spatial theory of news consumption and electoral competition. Review of Economic Studies, 75 (3): 699-728, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00495.x
  21. Choi J.p. 2006. Broadcast competition and advertising with free entry: subscription vs. free-to-air. Information Economics and Policy, 18 (2): 181-196, DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2005.12.002
  22. Commissione europea. 2007. Media pluralism in the member states of the european union. Commission Staff Working Document 32.
  23. Commissione europea. 2009. Independent study on indicators for media pluralism in the member states, mimeo,
  24. Corneo G. 2006. Media capture in a democracy: the role of wealth concentration. Journal of Public Economics, 90 (1-2): 37-58.
  25. Crampes C., Harichtabalet C., Jullien B. 2009. advertising, competition and entry in media industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57 (1): 7-31, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00368.x
  26. Cunningham B.M., alexander p.J. 2004. a theory of broadcast media concentration and commercial advertising. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 6 (4): 557-575, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2004.00180.x
  27. D’Aspremont C., Gabszewicz J., Thisse J.F. 1979. On hotelling’s ‘stability in competition’. Econometrica, 47 (5): 1145-1150, DOI: 10.2307/1911955
  28. Della Vigna S., Kaplan e. 2007. The Fox news effect: media bias and voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (3): 1187-1234, DOI: 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187
  29. Di Tella R., Franceschelli I. 2011. Government advertising and media coverage of corruption scandals. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3 (4): 119-151, DOI: 10.1257/app.3.4.119
  30. Djankov S., Mcliesh C., nenova T., Shleifer a. 2003. Who owns the media?. Journal of Law and Economics, 46 (2): 341-382, DOI: 10.1086/377116
  31. Dukes a. 2004. The adverstising market in a product oligopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics, 52 (3): 327-348, DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1821.2004.00229.x
  32. Dukes A., Gal-Or E. 2003. negotiations and exclusivity contracts for advertising. Marketing Science, 22 (2): 222-245, DOI: 10.1287/mksc.22.2.222.16036
  33. Durante R., Knight B. 2012. partisan control, media bias, and viewer responses: evidence from Berlusconi’s Italy. Journal of European Economic Association, 10 (3): 451-481, DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01060.x
  34. Ellman M., Germano F. 2009. What do the papers sell? a model of advertising and media bias. Economic Journal, 119 (1): 680-704, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02218.x
  35. Esteves-Sorenson C., Perretti F. 2012. Micro-costs: inertia in television viewing. Economic Journal, 122 (563): 867-902, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02507.x
  36. FIeG. 2012. la stampa in Italia (2009-2011), mimeo.
  37. Gabszewicz J., laussel D., Sonnac N. 2001. press advertising and the ascent of the ‘pensée unique’?. European Economic Review, 45 (4-6): 645-651, DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00139-8
  38. Gabszewicz J., laussel D., Sonnac N. 2002. press advertising and the political differentiation of newspapers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4 (3): 317-334, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9779.00100
  39. Gabszewicz J., laussel D., Sonnac N. 2004. programming and advertising competition in the broadcasting industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13 (4): 657-669, DOI: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2004.00027.x
  40. Gal-Or E., Dukes A. 2003. Minimum differentiation in commercial media markets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12 (3): 291-325, DOI: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00291.x
  41. Gambaro M., Puglisi R. 2010. What do ads buy? Daily coverage of listed companies on the Italian press. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2010/26.
  42. Gentzkow M.A., Shapiro J.M. 2006. Media bias and reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114 (2): 280-316, DOI: 10.1086/499414
  43. Gentzkow M.A., Shapiro J. 2010. What drives media slant? evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78 (1): 35-71, DOI: 10.3982/eCTa7195
  44. Gerber A., Karlan D., Bergan D. 2009. Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1 (2): 35-52, DOI: 10.1257/app.1.2.35
  45. Germani F., Meier M. 2010. Concentration and self-censorship in commercial media. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Working Paper 1256.
  46. Groseclose T., Milyo J. 2005. A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (4): 1191-1237, DOI: 10.1162/003355305775097542
  47. Häckner J., Nyberg S. 2008. advertising and media market concentration. Journal of Media Economics, 21 (2): 79-96, DOI: 10.1080/08997760802069861
  48. Ho D., Quinn K. 2008. Measuring explicit political positions of media. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3 (4): 353-377, DOI: 10.1561/100.00008048
  49. Istat. 2011. Aspetti della vita quotidiana nel 2010. Indagine multiscopo. Istat: Roma.
  50. Kahneman D., Tversky A. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185 (4157): 1124-1131, DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  51. Kaiser U., Wright J. 2006. price structure in two-sided markets: evidence from the magazine industry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24 (1): 1-28, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.06.002
  52. Kaiser U., Song M. 2009. Do media consumers really dislike advertising? an empirical assessment of the role of advertising in print media markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27 (2): 292-301, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.09.003
  53. Kind H., Nilssen T., Sørgard L. 2009. Business models for media firms: does competition matter for how they raise revenue. Marketing Science, 28 (6): 1112-1128, DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1090.0514
  54. Kohlschein I. 2004. economic distortions caused by public funding of broad-casting in europe, mimeo.
  55. Kremhelmer S., Zenger H. 2008. advertising and the screening role of mass media. Information Economics and Policy, 20 (2): 107-119, DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.11.003
  56. Larcinese V. 2007. The instrumental voter goes to the newsagent. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19 (3): 249-276, DOI: 10.1177/0951629807077569
  57. Larcinese V. 2009. Information acquisition, ideology and turnout: theory and evidence from Britain. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 21 (2): 237-276, DOI: 10.1177/0951629808100765
  58. Leuven K.U., ICRI. 2009. Independent study on indicators for media pluralism in the member states. Towards a risk-based approach, mimeo.
  59. Mangani A. 2003. profit and audience maximization in broadcasting markets. Information Economics and Policy, 15 (3): 305-315, DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6245(02)00112-9
  60. McCluskey J., Swinnen J. 2007. Rational ignorance and negative news in the information market. LICOS Discussion Paper Series 191.
  61. Motta M., Polo M. 1997. Concentration and public policy in broadcasting industry: the future of television. Economic Policy, 12 (25): 295-334, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0327.00023
  62. Motta M., Polo M. 2001. Beyond the spectrum constraint: concentration and entry in the broadcasting industry. Rivista di Politica Economica: 91 (4-5): 111-144.
  63. Mullainathan S., Shleifer A. 2005. The market for news. American Economic Review, 95 (4): 1031-1053, DOI: 10.1257/0002828054825619
  64. Nilssen T., Sørgard L. 2000. TV advertising, program quality, and product-market oligopoly, mimeo.
  65. Nilssen T., Sørgard L. 2009. The television industry: the interplay between products, advertising, and programme quality. SNF Report 3/00.
  66. OeCD. 2010. The Evolution Of News And The Internet. OeCD: Paris.
  67. OeCD. 2011. Communication Outlook 2011. OeCD: Paris.
  68. Peitz M., Valletti T. 2008. Content and advertising in the media: pay-tv versus free-toair. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26 (4): 949-965, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.08.003
  69. Petrova M. 2009. newspaper and parties. How advertising revenue created an independent press, mimeo.
  70. Petrova M. 2011. Mass media and special interest groups, mimeo.
  71. Polo M. 2005. Regulation for pluralism in media markets, mimeo.
  72. Polo M. 2010. Notizie S.p.A. Laterza: Roma.
  73. Prat A., Stromberg D. 2011. The political economy of mass media. CEPR Discussion Paper DP8246.
  74. Puglisi R. 2006. Being the new York Times: the political behaviour of a newspaper. Political Economy and Public Policy (PEPP) Working Paper 20.
  75. Reisinger M. 2012. platform competition for advertisers and users in media markets. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30 (2): 243-252, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.10.002
  76. Reuter J., Zitzewitz E. 2006. Do ads influence editors? advertising and bias in the financial media. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 21 (1): 197-227, DOI: 10.1093/qje/121.1.197
  77. Rochet J.C., Tirole J. 2006. Two-sided markets: a progress report. Rand Journal of Economics, 37 (3): 645-667, DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
  78. Rubinstein A. 2000. Economics and Language. Cambridge University press: Cambridge (UK), DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511492358
  79. Sobbrio F. 2010. lobbying the voter: special interest and media influence on direct democracy, mimeo.
  80. Sobbrio F. 2011. a citizen-editors model of news media, mimeo.
  81. Sonnac N. 2000. Readers attitudes towards press advertising: are they ad-lovers or adaverse? Journal of Media Economics, 13 (4): 249-259, DOI: 10.1207/S15327736Me1304_4
  82. Steiner P.O. 1952. program patterns and preferences, and the workability of competition in radio broadcasting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66 (2): 193-300, DOI: 10.2307/1882942
  83. Strömberg D. 2004. Mass media competition, political competition, and public policy. Review of Economic Studies, 71 (1): 265-284, DOI: 10.1111/0034-6527.00284
  84. Sutton J. 1991. Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration. MIT press: Cambridge (Mass.).
  85. Ward D. 2004. A Mapping Study of Media Concentration and Ownership in Ten European Countries. Commissariaat voor de Media: Hilversum.

, Mezzi di comunicazione di massa e pluralismo: un approccio economico in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 3/2013, pp 43-69, DOI: 10.3280/POLI2013-003002