La coesione sociale nell’epoca del neoliberismo

Author/s Sergio Cecchi
Publishing Year 2008 Issue 2008/2 Language Italian
Pages 26 P. 55-80 File size 243 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Social Cohesion in the Age of Neo-Liberism - The essay aims to investigate the reasons and meanings of the transition from a redistribution to a neo-liberal model of social cohesion. After the Great Society project against poverty and social exclusion, promoted by President Lyndon Johnson, some scholars started to remark that poverty, unemployment, marginality and crime are products of the Welfare State. Supported by the development of neoliberal economics, such criticism focuses on the fact that public morality is the key to strengthen social cohesion and to control social deviance. They argued that social programs generated massive inefficiencies, and that financing them required incentive-sapping levels of taxation and inflationary budget deficits. In this sense, these authors viewed retrenchment not as a necessary deficiency but as something to promote. The consequence on Welfare State has been the increase in poverty and the development of an excessive prison policy against some ethnic minorities, above all the Afro-Americans and the Latin-Americans, thus increasing social differences within the American society. The United States has the world’s highest incarceration rate today, with one in 32 adults currently or previously behind bars. Keywords: social cohesion; neo-liberalism; distributive justice; welfare state.

Sergio Cecchi, La coesione sociale nell’epoca del neoliberismo in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 2/2008, pp 55-80, DOI: