Smart life: dalla tecnologia al mercato. La prospettiva dei consumatori e delle imprese

Titolo Rivista MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ
Autori/Curatori Angelo Di Gregorio, Laura Gavinelli, Francesca Montagnini
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 28 P. 13-40 Dimensione file 132 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2014-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il termine smart è entrato recentemente a far parte del vocabolario comune in relazione principalmente all’impatto che la rivoluzione tecnologica sta avendo sulla vita quotidiana e sulle dinamiche di mercato. La ricerca qui presentata intende offrire un primo momento di riflessione su quale sia l’interpretazione che domanda e offerta, ovvero consumatori e imprese, stanno dando di smart e, più nello specifico di smart life, e su quale sia il rapporto tra smart, tecnologia e reale orientamento al mercato. La ricerca, di tipo esplorativo-qualitativo, individua alcune aree emergenti di significato legate alla smart life e opportunità di sviluppo per le imprese ad esse connesse.;

Keywords:Smart, smart life, enabling technology, quality of life, interviste in profondità, focus group.

  1. Batty M., Axhausen K.W., Giannotti F., Pozdnoukhov A., Bazzani A., Wachowicz M., Ouzounis G., and Portugali Y. (2012). Smart City of the Future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214: 481-518, DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
  2. Belk H., Rafferty B. (2012). Simple is smart and other lessons from the Global Brand Simplicity Index. Journal of Brand Strategy I (3): 254-261.
  3. Bertone V. (1993). Creatività aziendale. Metodi, tecniche e casi per valorizzare il potenziale crativo di manager e imprenditori. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Bloor M., Frankland J., Thomas M. and Robson K. (2001). Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage.
  5. Bougon M.G. (1983). Uncovering cognitive maps: the self-Q technique. In: Morgan G., a cura di, Beyond method: strategies for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  6. Camestrari R., Ricci Bitti P. (1989). Il colloquio clinico. In: Trentini G., a cura di, Teoria e prassi del colloquio e dell’intervista. Roma: NIS.
  7. Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe, Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2): 65-82, DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
  8. Carrillo F.J. (2006). Knowledge Cities. Oxford: Elsevier.
  9. Chater N. (1999). The Search for Simplicity: A Fundamental Cognitive Principle? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A (2): 273-302.
  10. Cocco G. (1992). Creatività, ricerca e innovazione. Individui e imprese di fronte alle sfide della società post-industriale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. Creswell, J.W. & Piano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. California: Sage Publications.
  12. Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  13. Davis, D.F., Golicic, S.L. & Boerstler, C.N. (2011). Benefits and challenges of conducting multiple methods research in marketing. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 39(3): 467-479, doi 10.1007/s11747-010-0204-7.
  14. Daymon C., Holloway I. (2002). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications. London: Routledge.
  15. Diener E., Chan M.Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1): 1-43, DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
  16. Diener E. & Suh E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40 (1-2): 189-216.
  17. Dubois A., Araujo L. (2004). Research methods in industrial marketing studies. In Håkansson H., Harrison D. and Waluszewski A., a cura di, Rethinking marketing: developing a new understanding of markets, 207-228. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  18. Dubois A., Gadde L.E. (2002). Systematic combining. An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7): 553-560.
  19. Edvardsson B., Tronvoll B. and Gruber T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39: 327-339, DOI: 10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y
  20. Eisenhardt K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Studies Research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550.
  21. Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87 (3): 215-251, DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
  22. Fassio O., Rollero C., De Piccoli N. (2013). Health, Quality of Life and Population Density: A Preliminary Study on ‘‘Contextualized’’ Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 76:343-466, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-005-2877-8
  23. Feldman M.S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  24. Parrish H. (2012). The evolution of Simplicity and Meaning. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3): 352–354, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00906.x
  25. Fleury-Bahi G., Marcouyeux A., Préau M. and Annabi-Attia T. (2012). Development and validation of an environnemental quality of life scale: study of a french sample. Social Indicators Research, 113 (3):903-913, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0119-4
  26. Florida R.L. (2005). Cities and the Creative. New York: Harper Business.
  27. Gilman E. (2013). Towards interactive smart spaces. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 5: 5-22, DOI: 10.3233/AIS-120189
  28. Hancke G.P., de Carvalho e Silva B. and Hancke G.P. Jr. (2013). The Role of Advanced Sensing in Smart Cities. Sensors, 13(1):393-425, DOI: 10.3390/s130100393
  29. Heller D., Watson D. and Ilies, R. (2006). The dynamic process of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 74(5): 1421–1450, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00415.x
  30. Hummel, R.P. (1991). Stories Managers Tell: Why They Are as Valid as Science. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 31-41. DOI: 10.2307/976634
  31. Krueger R.A., Casey M.A. (2009). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  32. Lee J.H. (2013). An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 80 (2): 286-306, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.020
  33. Leydesdorff L., Deakin M. (2011). The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: a neoevolutionary Perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2): 53-63, DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601111
  34. Li M., Vitanyi P. (1997). An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  35. Liu J. E., Smeesters D. and Trampe D. (2012). Effects of Messiness on Preferences for Simplicity. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, DOI: 10.1086/662139
  36. Lombardi P., Giordano S., Farouh H. and Yousef W.(2012). Modelling the smart city performance, Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2): 137-149, DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
  37. Ma J., Yang L.T., and Apduhan B. (2005). Towards a smart world and uniquitous intelligence: a walkthrough from smart things to smart hyperspaces and ubickids. Journal of pervasive computing & communication, 1 (1): 53-68.
  38. Maeda J. (2006). The Laws of Simplicity (Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life). Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  39. Michel S., Stephen W. Brown S.W., and Gallant A.S. (2008). Service-Logic Innovations: how to innovate customers, not products. California Management Review, 50 (3): 49-65, doi.
  40. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  41. Mitchell G. (2000). Indicators as tools to guide progress on sustainable development pathway. In Lawrence R.J., a cura di, Sustaining human settlement: a challenge for the new millennium, 55-104. North Shields, UK: Urban International Press.
  42. Molteni L., Troilo G. (2003). Ricerche di marketing. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  43. Moore C.M. (1994). Group Techniques for idea building. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  44. Oh J.M., Moon N.M. (2013). Towards a cultural user interface generation principles. Multimedia Tools Applications, 63: 195-216, DOI: 10.1007/s11042-012-1017-0
  45. Payne A.F., Storbacka K. and Frow P. (2008), Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 36, 83-96.
  46. Papista E., Dimitriadis S. (2012). Exploring consumer-brand relationship quality and Identification. Qualitative evidence from cosmetics brands. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 15 (1): 33-56, DOI: 10.1108/13522751211191982
  47. Pasimeni P. (2013). The Europe 2020 Index. Social Indicator Research, 110: 613-635, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9948-9
  48. Prahalad P., Ramaswamy V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14, DOI: 10.1002/dir.20015
  49. Rollero C., De Piccoli N. (2010). Does place attachment affect social well-being? European Review of Applied Psychology, 60: 233-238, DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2010.05.001
  50. Sayre S. (2001). Qualitative methods for marketplace research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  51. Shapiro J.M. (2006). Smart cities: quality of life, productivity, and the growth effects of human capital. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2): 324-335.
  52. Sirgy M.J., Michalos A.C., Ferriss A.L., Easterlin R.A., Patrick D. and Pavot W. (2006). The Quality-Of-Life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76: 343-466, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-005-2877-8
  53. Soscia I. (2000). L’analisi dei documenti per la ricerca di marketing: una proposta metodologica. Micro & Macro Marketing, 1: 79-96.
  54. Spaltro E. (1989). L’intervista di gruppo, in Trentini G., a cura di, Teoria e prassi del colloquio e dell’intervista, Roma: Nis.
  55. Tartaglia S. (2013). Different Predictors of Quality of Life in Urban Environment. Social Indicators Research, 113: 1045-1053, DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0126-5
  56. Tranos E., Gertner D. (2012). Smart networked cities?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2): 175-190, DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2012.660327
  57. Troilo G. (2001). Marketing knowledge management. Milano: Etas.
  58. Vargo S.L., Lusch R.F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36: 1-10, DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
  59. Vargo S.L., Lusch R.F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1):1-17.
  60. Vicari S., Troilo G. (1997). Affrontare il possibile: le mappe cognitive. Economia & Management, 1: 93-109.
  61. Viet Ngo L., O’Cass A. (2012). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority: the role of market orientation, marketing capability and innovation capability interactions. Product Development & Management Association, 29 (5): 861-877, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00939.x
  62. WHOQOL Group. (1998) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOLBRIEF quality of life.

Angelo Di Gregorio, Laura Gavinelli, Francesca Montagnini, Smart life: dalla tecnologia al mercato. La prospettiva dei consumatori e delle imprese in "MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ" 2/2014, pp 13-40, DOI: 10.3280/MC2014-002002