Social representations of LGBT adoptions in Italy. Content analysis of spontaneous conversations among facebook users

Author/s Emanuele Fino, Stefania Aiello
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 45-66 File size 113 KB
DOI 10.3280/RSC2014-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the last decade, countries ruling on LGBT marriage and adoption have been increasing, stimulating a public discussion observed in traditional and new media. The Italian public debate has been influenced by cultural and legal transformations occurring in the near European nations, although cultural and religious oppositions contributed to stop the process of legalization of LGBT unions and parenthood. In the present study, the authors investigate the representations of LGBT adoption emerging from a corpus Facebook spontaneous conversations. Text thematic clustering and similarity analysis were applied. The emerging four clusters showed the effort of negotiation of traditional and stereotypical family roles and related socio-cultural expectations, towards the definition of a new image of family.

Keywords: Social representations, adoptions, LGBT, facebook, thematic analysis, similitude analysis.

  1. Allan G. (2001). Personal relationships in late modernity. Personal Relationships, 8: 325-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00043.x
  2. Allan G., Hawker S., Crow G. (2001). Family diversity and change in britain and western europe. Journal of Family Issues, 22: 819-37.
  3. 10.1177/019251301022007002.
  4. Allen K.R., Demo D.H. (1995). The families of lesbians and gay men: a new frontier in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57: 111-27. DOI: 10.2307/353821
  5. Ariel J., McPherson D.W. (2000). Therapy with lesbian and gay parents and their children. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26: 421-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00313.x
  6. Barbagli M., Colombo A. (2007). Omosessuali moderni: gay e lesbiche in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  7. Barbagli M., Saraceno C., a cura di (1997). Lo Stato delle famiglie in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino. Bauman Z. (2003). Liquid love: on the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Beier L., Hofäcker D., Marchese E., Rupp M. (2010). Family stuctures and family forms – An overview of major trends and developments. Working report. Family Platform. Testo disponibile al sito: consultato in data 14/10/2013.
  9. Bernardes J. (1997). Family Studies: an Introduction. London: Routledge.
  10. Boele-Woelki K., Fuchs A., eds. (2003). Legal Recognition of Same Sex Couples in Europe. Intersentia, Cambridge, UK.
  11. Bottino M., Danna, D. (2005). La gaia famiglia. Che cos’è l’omogenitorialità. Trieste: Asterios.
  12. Boyd D.M., Ellison N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
  13. Cadoret A. (2009). The contribution of homoparental families to the current debate on kinship. In: Edwards J., Salazar C., eds., European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology. Oxford: Bergahan Books.
  14. Cahill S., Battle J., Meyer D. (2003). Partnering, parenting, and policy: family issues affecting Black lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. Race and Society, 6(2): 85-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.11.002
  15. Carnelli F., de Micheli R., Vesce M.C. (2009). Invisibilità manifeste: verso un approccio etno-demografico all’omogenitorialità. Famiglie Arcobaleno. Testo disponibile al sito: in data 07/10/2013.
  16. Court of Cassation (14:51:29). Decision n° 4184/2012. Case-Law. Testo disponibile al sito: consultato in data 01/10/2013.
  17. Del Giorgio E., Lombardo E. (2009). Institutionalising Intersectionality in Italy, gatekeepers and political dynamics. In: Verloo M., Walby S., eds., Quality in Gender and Equality Policies. European Commission, Sixth Framework Programme, Integrated Project. Testo disponibile al sito: consultato in data 09/10/2013.
  18. Dines M., Rigoletto S. (2012). Country cousins: Europeanness, sexuality and locality in contemporary italian television. Modern Italy, 17(4): 479-91. DOI: 10.1080/13532944.2012.706999
  19. Donovan M. (2003). The italian state: no longer Catholic, no longer Christian. West European Politics, 26(1): 95-116. DOI: 10.1080/01402380412331300217
  20. EOS Gallup Europe. (2003). Homosexual marriage, child adoption by homosexual couples: is the public ready? Testo disponibile al sito: consultato in data 24/10/2013.
  21. Erikson, E.H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. Madison: International Universities Press.
  22. Farr R.M., Moscovici S. (1984). Social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Finch J., Mason, J. (2000). Passing on: Kinship and inheritance in England. London: Psychology Press.
  23. Flaks D.K., Ficher I., Masterpasqua F., Joseph G. (1995). Lesbians choosing motherhood: a comparative study of lesbian and heterosexual parents and their children. Developmental psychology, 31(1): 105-14. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.1.105
  24. Flament C., Rouquette M.L. (2003). Anatomie des idées ordinaires. Paris: Armand Colin.
  25. Garton L., Haythornthwaite C., Wellman B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3: 0. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00062.
  26. Gartrell N., Deck A., Rodas C., Peyser H., Banks A. (2005). The national lesbian family study: 4. Interviews with the 10-year-old children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(4): 518-24. DOI: 10.1037/0002-9432.75.4.518
  27. Giddens A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Goldberg A.E. (2010). Lesbian and gay parents and their children: research on the family life cycle. Washington: American Psychological Association.
  28. Golombok S. (1999). New family forms: Children raised in solo mother families, lesbian mother families, and in families created by assisted reproduction. In-Balter L., Tamis-LeMonda C.S., eds., Child psychology: a handbook of contemporary issues, 429-46. New York: NY Psychology Press.
  29. Hassebrauck M., Fehr B. (2002). Dimensions of relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 9(3): 253-270. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6811.0001
  30. Helfer L., Voeten E. (2013). International courts as agents of legal change: evidence from LGBT rights in Europe. International Organisation, 1-34.
  31. Jodelet D. (2008). Social representations: the beautiful invention. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4): 411-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00383.x
  32. Lahlou S. (2012). Text mining methods: an answer to Chartier and Meunier. Papers on Social Representations, 20(38): 1-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02048.x
  33. LaVally R. (2007). The gay marriage debate: did the media agenda drive the policy agenda or vice versa? San Francisco: Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Testo disponibile al sito: consultatoin data 15/10/2013.
  34. Malle B.F., Stallworth L.M., Sidanius J., Pratto F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4): 741-63. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  35. Martin C.A., Colbert K.K. (1997). Parenting: a life span perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  36. Mason J. (2008). Tangible affinities and the real life fascination of kinship. Sociology, 42(1): 29-45. DOI: 10.1177/0038038507084824
  37. Moscovici S. (1973). Foreword. In: Herzlich C., ed., Health and illness: A social psychological analysis, ix-xiv. London: Academic Press. Moscovici S. (1976). Psychoanalysis, its Image and its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  38. Moscovici S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 211-50. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
  39. Parke R.D. (2004). Fathers, families, and the future: a plethora of plausible predictions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(4): 456-70. DOI: 10.1353/mpq.2004.0033
  40. Peirce C.S. ([1866-1913] 1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In: Hartshorne C., Weiss P., eds., Volumes I-VI. Burks A.W., ed., Volumes VIIVIII., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  41. Pietrantoni L., Prati G., Lelleri R., Graglia M., Chiari C., Palestini L. (2008). T11-O-05 MODI DI: a national health survey of gay, lesbian, bisexual people in Italy. Sexologies, 17(Supplement 1), S156. DOI: 10.1016/S1158-1360(08)72951-7
  42. Ratinaud P., Marchand P. (2012). Recherche improbable d’une homogène diversité: le débat sur l’identité nationale. Langages, 3: 93-107. DOI: 10.3917/lang.187.0093
  43. Rosch E. (1999). Principles of categorization. In: Margolis E., Laurence S., eds., Concepts: Core Readings. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  44. Saraceno C., a cura di (2003). Diversi da chi?: gay, lesbiche, transessuali in un’area metropolitana. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  45. Saraceno C. (2012). Coppie e famiglie. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  46. Scabini E., Iafrate R. (2003). Psicologia dei legami familiari. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  47. Schmidt I.H. (2013). Practices of networked identity. In: Hartley J., Burgess J., Bruns A., eds., A Companion to new media dynamics, 356-74. London: Blackwell.
  48. Thévenot L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagements. Moving between the Familiar and the Public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3): 409-23. DOI: 10.1177/1368431007080703
  49. Wainright J.L., Russell S.T., Patterson C.J. (2004). Psychosocial adjustment, school outcomes, and romantic relationships of adolescents with same-sex parents. Child development, 75(6): 1886-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00823.x
  50. Weigel D.J. (2008). The concept of family: an analysis of lay people’s views of family. Journal of Family Issues, 29: 1426-47. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X08318488
  51. Zammuner, V.L. (2000). Men’s and women’s lay theories of emotion. In Fischer A.H., ed., Gender and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Zanini G. (2011). Abandoned by the State, betrayed by the church: italian experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 23(5): 565-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.08.007
  53. Zhang S., Jiang H., Carroll J.M. (2010). Social identity in Facebook community life. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(4): 64-76. DOI: 10.4018/jvc

  • Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Homosexuality Scale of the Trueblood Sexual Attitudes Questionnaire Emanuele Fino, Marta Giuliani, Luca Pierleoni, Gaetano Gambino, Valentina Cosmi, Chiara Simonelli, in Journal of Homosexuality /2018 pp.784
    DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1364558
  • Atteggiamenti verso il matrimonio e il parenting di persone lesbiche e gay: correlazione con sessismo, omofobia e stigma sessuale interiorizzato Francesca Aversa, Francesca Tripodi, Filippo Maria Nimbi, Roberto Baiocco, Chiara Simonelli, in RIVISTA DI SESSUOLOGIA CLINICA 1/2017 pp.48
    DOI: 10.3280/RSC2017-001003

Emanuele Fino, Stefania Aiello, Le rappresentazioni sociali delle adozioni LGBT in Italia. Analisi del contenuto di conversazioni spontanee tra utenti facebook in "RIVISTA DI SESSUOLOGIA CLINICA" 1/2014, pp 45-66, DOI: 10.3280/RSC2014-001003