Investing in R&D in italy: trends and firms’ strategies, 2001-2010

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE
Autori/Curatori Andrea Bonaccorsi, Giulio Perani
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 43 P. 65-107 Dimensione file 242 KB
DOI 10.3280/POLI2014-003004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The subject of this article is the analysis of the Italian business R&D expenditure over the 2001-2010 period. Two main features make the Italian case interesting in international comparisons: first, the country has not been able to catch up with the average level of business R&D expenditure in the European Union (with respect to GDP) in spite of a constant increase of the R&D spending over the observed period; second, the R&D performing business sector has confirmed over the years its structural heterogeneity with respect to size distribution, sectorial and technological specialisation, and firm organisational models. A number of descriptive dimensions of the R&D activities of firms are investigated in order to identify explanatory factors for the performance in terms of R&D expenditure level, intensity, and persistence. The distinction between occasional and persistent R&D is also discussed, suggesting that such divide refers to two distinct R&D strategies that, possibly, introduce an additional dualism in the Italian business sector. The goal of the article is descriptive. The discussion of the state of the art of the literature is carried out mainly with the aim of commenting the evidence, rather than testing models. Thus the analysis keeps an exploratory attitude, opening the way for future strategies of explicit modeling and empirical testing.;

Keywords:R&S industriale, attività di R&S, persistenza della R&S

Jel codes:O30, O32, L20

  1. Abramovsky l., Harrison R., Simpson H. 2007. University research and the location of business R&D. The Economic Journal, 117 (519): C114-C141, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02038.x
  2. Acosta M., Coronado D., Flores E. 2011. University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence. Small Business Economics, 36 (3): 365-376, DOI: 10.1007/s11187-009-9224-4
  3. Anagnostopoulou S.C., Levis M. 2008. R&D and performance persistence: evidence from the United Kingdom. The International Journal of Accounting, 43 (3): 293-320, DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2008.06.004
  4. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. 2000. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Sciences, 79 (4): 435-443, DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.2000.tb01766.x
  5. Antonelli C., Crespi F., Scellato G. 2012. Inside innovation persistence: new evidence from Italian micro-data. Structural Change and Economics, 23 (4): 341-353, DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2012.03.002
  6. Archibugi D. 2001. Pavitt’s taxonomy sixteen years on: a review article. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 10 (5): 415-425, DOI: 10.1080/10438590100000016
  7. Balconi M., Brusoni S., Orsenigo L. 2010. In defence of the linear model: an essay. Research Policy, 39 (1): 1-13, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.013
  8. Baptista R., Swann G.M.P. 1998. Do firms in cluster innovate more?. Research Policy, 27 (5): 527-542, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
  9. Barlevy G. 2007. On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Review, 97 (4): 1131-1164, DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.4.1131
  10. Blass A., Yosha O. 2003. Financing R&D in mature companies: an empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12 (5): 425-447, DOI: 10.1080/1043859022000029249
  11. Bloch C. 2005. R&D investment and internal finance: the cash flow effect. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14 (3): 213-223, DOI: 10.1080/1043859042000312710
  12. Bodas Freitas I. M., Clausen T., Fontana R., Verspagen B. 2008. Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovation strategies: a cross-country comparison. TIK Working Paper on Innovation Studies 2008-1113.
  13. Bonaccorsi A. 2008. Anatomia dei processi di innovazione nelle medie imprese italiane. Mediobanca-Unioncamere: Milano.
  14. Bonaccorsi A., Colombo M.G., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C. 2013. University specialisation and new firm creation across industries. Small Business Economics, 41 (4): 837-863, DOI: 10.1007/s11187-013-9509-5
  15. Bonaccorsi A., Colombo M.G., Guerini M., Rossi-Lamastra C. 2014. The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case. Small Business Economics, 43: 261-287, DOI: 10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2
  16. Boschma R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39 (1): 61-74, DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  17. Bougheas S., Gorg H., Strobl E. 2003. Is R&D financially constrained? Theory and evidence from Irish manufacturing. Review of Industrial Organization, 22 (2): 159-174, DOI: 10.1023/a:1022905102446
  18. Breschi S., Lissoni F. 2001. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: a critical survey. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4): 975-1005, DOI: 10.1093/icc/10.4.975
  19. Brown J.R., Fazzari S.M., Petersen B.C. 2009. Financing innovation and growth: cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. Journal of Finance, 64 (1): 151-185, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x
  20. Bugamelli M., Cannari L., Lotti f., Magri S. 2012. Il gap innovativo del sistema produttivo italiano: radici e possibili rimedi. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) della Banca d’Italia 121.
  21. Castaldi C. 2009. The relative weight of manufacturing and services in Europe: an innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (6): 709-722, DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.001
  22. Castellacci F. 2008. Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37 (6-7): 978-994, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011
  23. Cefis E. 2003. Is there persistence in innovative activities? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (4): 489-515, DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7187(02)00090-5
  24. Cefis E., Orsenigo L. 2001. The persistence of innovative activities. a cross-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Research Policy, 30 (7): 1139-1158, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00139-6
  25. Clausen T., Pohjola M., Sapprasert K., Verspagen B. 2012. Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21 (3): 553-585, DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtr051
  26. Coad A., Rao R. 2010. Firm growth and R&D expenditure. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19 (2): 127-145, DOI: 10.1080/10438590802472531
  27. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128-152, DOI: 10.2307/2393553
  28. Cohen W.M., Klepper S. 1996a. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106 (437): 925-951, DOI: 10.2307/2235365
  29. Cohen W.M., Klepper S. 1996b. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78 (2): 232-243, DOI: 10.2307/2109925
  30. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P. 2002. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48 (1): 1-23, DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
  31. Comin D., Gertler M. 2006. Medium-term business cycles. American Economic Review, 96 (3): 523-551, DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.3.523
  32. Crépon B., Duguet E., Mairesse J. 1998. Research and development, innovation and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7 (2): 115-158, DOI: 10.1080/10438599800000031
  33. David P.A., Hall B.H., Toole A.A. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? a review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29 (4-5): 497-529, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
  34. Doring T., Schnellenbach J. 2006. What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth? A survey of the literature. Regional Studies, 40 (3): 375-395, DOI: 10.1080/00343400600632739
  35. Duguet E., Monjon S. 2002. Les fondements microéconomiques de la persistance de l’innovation. Une analyse économétrique. Revue Économique, 53 (3): 625-636.
  36. Duguet E., Monjon S. 2004. Is innovation persistent at the firm level? An econometric examination comparing the propensity score and regression methods. Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques 04075.
  37. Falk M. 2006. What drives business research and development (R&D) intensity across organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) countries?. Applied Economics, 38 (5): 533-547, DOI: 10.1080/00036840500391187
  38. Flaig G., Stadler M. 1994. Success breeds success. The dynamics of the innovation process. Empirical Economics, 19 (1): 55-68, DOI: 10.1007/Bf01205728
  39. Francois P., Lloyd-Ellis H. 2009. Schumpeterian business cycles with pro-cyclical R&D. Review of Economic Dynamics, 12 (4): 567-591, DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2009.02.004
  40. Fritsch M., Meschede M. 2001. Product innovation, process innovation, and size. Review of Industrial Organization, 19 (3): 335-350, DOI: 10.1023/a:1011856020135
  41. Fritsch M., Franke G. 2004. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation. Research Policy, 33 (2): 245-255, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00123-9
  42. Ganter A., Hecker A. 2013. Persistence of innovation: discriminating between types of innovation and sources of state dependence. Research Policy, 42 (8): 1431-1445, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.001
  43. Geroski P., Van Reenen J., Walters C. 1997. How persistently do firms innovate?. Research Policy, 26 (1): 33-48, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00903-1
  44. Gimpke C., Sofka W. 2007. Search patterns and absorptive capacity: a comparison of low and high-technology firms from thirteen European countries. ZEW Discussion Paper 07-062.
  45. Godin B. 2001. Defining RD: is research always systematic?. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics Paper 7.
  46. Godin B. 2002. The rise of innovation surveys: measuring a fuzzy concept. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics Paper 16.
  47. Gorg H., Strobl E. 2007. The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74: 215-234, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00547.x
  48. Griliches Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4): 1651-1707.
  49. Guellec D., Van Pottelsberghe de La Potterie B. 2003. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12 (3): 225-243, DOI: 10.1080/10438590290004555
  50. Hall B. 2002. The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18 (1): 35-51, DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35
  51. Hall B., Oriani R. 2006. Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in france, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24 (5): 971-993, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.12.001
  52. Hao K., Jaffe A. 1993. Effect of liquidity on firms’ R&D spending. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2 (4): 275-282, DOI: 10.1080/10438599300000008
  53. Himmelberg C.P., Petersen B.C. 1994. R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1): 38-51, DOI: 10.2307/2109824
  54. Jensen M.B., Johnson B., Lorenz E., Lundvall B.-A. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36 (5): 680-693, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006
  55. Laursen K., Salter A. 2004. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33 (8), 1201-1215, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
  56. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. 1996. Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology specific. Research Policy, 25 (3): 451-478, DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00840-3
  57. Malerba F., Orsenigo L., Peretto P. 1997. Persistence of innovative activities, sectoral patterns of innovation and international technological specialization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15 (6): 801-826, DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00012-X
  58. Mañez Castillejo J.A., Rochina Barrachina M.E., Sanchis Llopis A., Sanchis Llopis J. 2006. The decision to invest in R&D: a panel data analysis for Spanish manufacturing. International Journal of Applied Economics, 3 (2): 80-94.
  59. Mañez Castillejo J.A., Rochina M.E., Sanchis Llopis A., Sanchis Llopis J. 2009. The role of sunk costs in the decision to invest in R&D. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57 (4): 712-735, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6451.2009.00398.x
  60. Matteucci N., Sterlacchini A. 2009. R&S, innovazione e produttività nelle imprese manifatturiere italiane, in Rondi L., Silva F. (a cura di) Produttività e cambiamento nell’industria italiana. Indagini quantitative. il Mulino: Bologna.
  61. Miozzo M., Soete L. 2001. Internationalization of services: a technological perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67 (2-3): 159-185, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00091-3
  62. Moncada-Paternò-Castello P., Ciupagea C., Piccaluga A. 2006. l’innovazione industriale in Italia: persiste il modello “senza ricerca”?. L’Industria, 3 (6): 533-553, DOI: 10.1430/22650
  63. Nelson R., Winter S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge (Mass.).
  64. OECD. 2002. Frascati Manual. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. OECD: Paris.
  65. OECD. 2009. Policy Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth. OECD: Paris.
  66. Parisi M., Schiantarelli F., Sembenelli A. 2006. Productivity, innovation creation and absorption, and R&D. Microevidence for Italy. European Economic Review, 50 (8): 2037-2061, DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2005.08.002
  67. Pavitt K. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6): 343-373, DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  68. Perkmann M., Tartari V., McKelvey M., Autio E., Broström A., D’Este P., Fini R., Geuna a., Grimaldi R., Hughes A., Krabel S., Kitson M., Llerena P., Lissoni F., Salter A., Sobrero M. 2013. Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university industry relations. Research Policy, 42 (2): 423-442, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  69. Peters B. 2009. Persistence of innovation: stylized facts and panel data evidence. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34 (2): 226-243, DOI: 10.1007/s10961-007-9072-9
  70. Quatraro F. 2009. Innovation structural change and productivity growth. Evidence from Italian regions 1980-2003. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33 (5): 1001-1022, DOI: 10.1093/cje/ben063
  71. Raymond W., Mohnen P., Palm F., Schim Van der Loeff S. 2010. Persistence of innovation in Dutch manufacturing: is it spurious?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92 (3): 495-504, DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00004
  72. Rogers M. 2004. Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2): 141-153, DOI: 10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000014451.99047.69
  73. Rondi L., Silva F. (a cura di) 2009. Produttività e cambiamento nell’industria italiana. Indagini quantitative. il Mulino: Bologna.
  74. Roper S., Hewitt-Dundas N. 2008. Innovation persistence: survey and case-study evidence. Research Policy, 37 (1): 149-162, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.005
  75. Santarelli E., Sterlacchini A. 1990. Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 2 (3): 223-228, DOI: 10.1007/Bf00389530
  76. Schumpeter J. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Row: New York.
  77. Stiglitz J.E. 1987. Technological change, sunk costs and competition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 883-937, DOI: 10.2307/2534456
  78. Sutton J. 1991. Sunk Costs and Market Structure. The MIT Press: Cambridge (Mass.).
  79. Tether B.S. 2003. The sources and aims of innovation in services: variety between and within sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12 (6): 481-505, DOI: 10.1080/1043859022000029221
  80. Tether B.S., Tajar A. 2008. Beyond industry-university links: sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science base. Research Policy, 37 (6-7): 1079-1095, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003
  81. Thompson P. 1999. Rationality, rules of thumb, and R&D. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10 (3): 321-40, DOI: 10.1016/S0954-349X(99)00007-7
  82. Triguero A., Córcoles D. 2013. Understanding innovation: an analysis of persistence for Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 42 (2): 340-352, DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.08.003
  83. Vega-Juardo J., Gracia-Guitierrez A., Fernandez-De-lucio I. 2009. Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18 (4): 637-670, DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtp023
  84. Veugelers R., Cassiman B. 1999. Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28 (1): 63-80, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00106-1
  85. Wälde K., Woitek U. 2004. R&D expenditure in G7 countries and the implications for endogenous fluctuations and growth. Economics Letters, 82 (1): 91-97, DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.07.014
  86. Zahra S.A., George G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 185-203, DOI: 10.5465/aMR.2002.6587995

  • Multinational firms and the creation of technological linkages in Italy Claudio Cozza, Antonello Zanfei, in Cuadernos de Economía /2018 pp.429
    DOI: 10.15446/cuad.econ.v37n74.58077
  • R&D endowments at home driving R&D internationalisation: Evidence from the Italian business R&D survey Claudio Cozza, Chiara Franco, Giulio Perani, in Technological Forecasting and Social Change /2018 pp.277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.035
  • The intensity of business R&D in Italy: why reducing the gap with the EU is possible and worthwhile Alessandro Sterlacchini, in Economia e Politica Industriale /2017 pp.245
    DOI: 10.1007/s40812-016-0068-z
  • Foreign vs. domestic multinationals in R&D linkage strategies Claudio Cozza, Chiara Franco, Giulio Perani, Antonello Zanfei, in Industry and Innovation /2021 pp.725
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1865133

Andrea Bonaccorsi, Giulio Perani, Investing in R&D in italy: trends and firms’ strategies, 2001-2010 in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 3/2014, pp 65-107, DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-003004