Sustainable Governance for a New "Proximity Market"of our Agriculture

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Gian Paolo Cesaretti, Rosa Misso, Francesca D'Alessandro, H. Shakir Hanna Safwat, Brent S. Steel, Zacharoula S. Andreopoulou
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 12 P. 31-42 Dimensione file 159 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2014-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The review of institutional organization of the municipalities in metropolitan cities leads us to reflect on the new role that agriculture and its stakeholders have to play in the pursuit of sustainability of well-being. In this context, this paper aims to highlight new models of governance for agriculture in the future, more appropriate to the emergence of a new proximity market, but especially more embedded in a feedback system that it will be able to offer in terms of lifestyles, mobility, work, health, leisure, social relationships and milieu. More precisely, agriculture can find a proximity market, whether it will be able to ensure the replicability of the stock of social, human, natural and economic capital, to respond to new lifestyles and to maintain and protect the identity of the territory.

La rivisitazione dell’assetto istituzionale dei territori comunali in città metropolitane spinge a riflettere sul nuovo ruolo che l’agricoltura ed i relativi stakeholder devono svolgere per il perseguimento della sostenibilità del benessere. In tale ottica, il presente lavoro mira ad evidenziare i nuovi modelli di governance per l’agricoltura del futuro, più congrui alla nascita di un nuovo mercato di prossimità, ma soprattutto maggiormente incastonati in un sistema di risposte che essa dovrà saper offrire in termini di stili di vita, mobilità, lavoro, salute, tempo libero, relazioni sociali e milieu. L’agricoltura potrà trovare un suo mercato di prossimità se saprà assicurare la replicabilità degli stock di capitale sociale, umano, naturale ed economico, rispondere a nuovi stili di vita e mantenere e tutelare le identità del territorio di riferimento.

Keywords:Mercato di prossimità, sostenibilità del benessere, agricoltura sostenibile, città metropolitana, agricoltura di prossimità

  1. Andreopoulou Z., Misso R., Cesaretti G.P. (2014). Using the internet to support green business for rural development and environmental Protection. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 15: 723-732.
  2. Antimiani A., Henke R. (2007). Old and New partners: Similarity and competition in the EU foreign agri-food trade. Food Economics, 3.
  3. Ayre G., Callway R. (eds.) (2005). Governance for sustainable development – A foundation for the future. Earthscan, London, Sterling, VA.
  4. Bache I., Flinders M. (eds.) (2004). Multi-level Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  5. Baker S. (2005). Sustainable Development. Routledge, London.
  6. Baldwin R., Martin P. (1999). Two Waves of Globalization: Superficial Similarities and Fundamental Differences. In: Siebert H. (ed.), Globalization and Labour. Mohr J.C.B., Tübingen: 3-59.
  7. Beierle T.C., Konisky D.M. (2001). What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. En- vironment and Planning: Government and Policy. 19: 515-527, DOI: 10.1068/c5s
  8. Biermann F. (2006). Global governance and the environment. In: Betsill M., Hochstetler K., Stevis D. (eds.), Advances in International Environmental Politics. Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants: 237-264.
  9. Biermann F. (2007). Earth system governance’ as a cross cutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17: 326-337, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010
  10. Bloomfield D., Collins K., Fry C., Munton R. (2001). Deliberation and inclusion: vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance? Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 19: 501-513, DOI: 10.1068/c6s
  11. Borrelli I.P., Misso R., Ruggeri F. (2013). Well-being sustainability, territorial dimension and multifunctional agriculture. Calitatea-Acces La Succes, 14: 93-98.
  12. Bracke R., Albrecht J. (2007). Competing environmental management standards: how ISO 14001 outnumbered EMAS in Germany, the UK, France, and Sweden. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 25: 611-627, DOI: 10.1068/c0602j
  13. Bucek J., Smith B. (2000). New approaches to local democracy: direct democracy, participation and the `third sector. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy.
  14. Cairncross F. (1997). The Death of Distance. Orion, London.
  15. Carter N. (2007). The Politics of the Environment. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511819179
  16. Cherp A., George C., Kirkpatrick C. (2004). A methodology for assessing national sustainable development strategies. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 22: 913-926, DOI: 10.1068/c0310j
  17. Clapp J., Dauvergne P. (2005), Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  18. Darby K. (2008). Decomposing local: a conjoint analysis of locally produced foods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90: 476-486, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01111.x
  19. De Benedictis L., Salvatici L. (2011). The Trade Impact of European Union Preferential Policies. Ananalysis through Gravity Models. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16564-1
  20. Dingwerth K., Pattberg P. (2006), Global governance as a perspective on word politics. Global Governance, 121: 85-203.
  21. Dollar D., Kraay A. (2004). Trade, Growth and Poverty. The Economic Journal, 114 (February), F22-F49, DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-0133.2004.00186.x
  22. Fujita M., Krugman P.R., Venables A.J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  23. Jordan A. (2008). The governance of sustainable development: taking stock and looking forwards. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26: 17-33, DOI: 10.1068/cav6
  24. Helg F., De Benedictis L. (2002). Globalizzazione. Rivista di politica economica, XCII, 3-4: 139-209.
  25. Lehtonen M. (2007). Environmental policy integration through OECD peer reviews.
  26. Environmental Politics, 16: 15-35, DOI: 10.1080/09644010601073432.LowS.A.,VogelS.(2011).DirectandIntermediatedMarketingofLocalFoodsintheUnitedStates.UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,Washington,DC
  27. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  28. Misso R. (2011). “Sustainable governance in the integrated system “Environment – Agriculture – Health” through ICTs. In: Andreopoulou Z., Manos B., Polman
  29. N., Viaggi D., Agricultural and Environmental Informatics, Governance, and Management: Emerging Research Applications. Information Science Reference (Igi Global), Hershey: 87-101.
  30. Misso R. (2013). Particular Stakeholders: verso un sistema di full Governance. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità: 119-128, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2013-001009
  31. Misso R., Cesaretti G.P., Viola I. (2013a). Sustainability of well-being, food system and environmental issues. Calitatea-Acces La Succes, 14, S1 – March: 138-143.
  32. Misso R., Marinelli N., Borrelli I.P. (2013b). Territorial systems with rural vocation, innovation and climate change: from the web an opportunity for the sustainability of well-being. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, III.
  33. Rodrik D. (2011). La globalizzazione intelligente. Laterza, Bari.
  34. Safwat H. Shakir Hanna, Irvin W. Osborne Lee, Misso R., Cesaretti G.P. (2014). Assessment of the future sustainability of food supply and food security. Politica Agricola Internazionale, 3: 23-40.
  35. Sen A.K. (2000). La ricchezza della ragione, Denaro, valori, identità. il Mulino, Bologna.
  36. Speth J., Haas P. (2006). Global Environmental Governance. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  37. United Nations (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development A/CONF.199/20 and A/CONF.199/20/corr.1 – United Nations, New York.
  38. UNEP (2007). Global Environmental Outlook GEO4. United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP, Nairobi.
  39. Voss J.-P., Bauknecht D., Kemp R. (eds.) (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  40. World Commission on Environment and Development – WCED (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  41. Kernaghan W. (2005). Sustainable governance in the twenty-first century: Moving beyond instrument choice. Designing government: From instruments to governance: 242-280.
  42. Wolf H.C. (2000). Intranational Home Bias in Trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(4): 555-563, DOI: 10.1162/003465300559046

  • Towards a Universal Right to Well-being Sustainability Gian Paolo Cesaretti, Maria Carmen de Angelis, Rosa Misso, Aquilina Olleia, Hanna Safwat H. Shakir, in RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA' 1/2015 pp.9
    DOI: 10.3280/RISS2015-001002
  • Regional Sustainability Christiana Koliouska, Zacharoula Andreopoulou, Rosa Misso, Irene Paola Borelli, in International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems /2017 pp.29
    DOI: 10.4018/IJAEIS.2017010103

Gian Paolo Cesaretti, Rosa Misso, Francesca D'Alessandro, H. Shakir Hanna Safwat, Brent S. Steel, Zacharoula S. Andreopoulou, Sustainable Governance for a New "Proximity Market"of our Agriculture in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2014, pp 31-42, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2014-002003