Monadic and nomadic powers in the era of globalization, personalization and spectacularization of politics

Author/s Donata Francescato
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2014/2
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 69-79 File size 43 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSC2014-002006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article examines the interactions between social and institutional contexts and individual characteristics of political leaders which may favor the emergence of monad and nomad types of power. Globalization processes promote nomad power with decision making shifting to diverse international settings. However the increased role of media infotainment promotes the personalization of politics; building and destroying the popularity of political leaders, who are mostly males with self-enhancement values; who tend to prefer monad ways to exercise power. Only increasing the number of elected women and young people who uphold self-transcendence values will nomad types of power have more opportunities to emerge in our political institutions.

Keywords: Power, leadership, personalization, politics, gender.

  1. Adam K. and Derber C. (2008). The new feminized majority: how democrats can changes America with women’s values. Boulder Co: Paradigm Publisher.
  2. Amato G. (1996). I dilemma del maggioritario. In: M. Fedele M. e R. Leonardi, a cura di, La politica senza partiti. Roma: Seam.
  3. Best H. (2011). Does personality matter in politics? Personality factors as determinants of parliamentary recruitment and policy preferences. Comparative Sociology, 10: 928-948.
  4. Campus D. (2013). Women political leaders and the media. London: Palgrave.
  5. Caprara G., Barbaranelli C., Consiglio C., Picconi L. and Zimbardo P.G. (2003). Personalities of politicians and voters: unique and synergistic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 849-856. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.84
  6. Caprara G. e Vecchione M. (in corso di pubblicazione) Personalizing Politics. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.
  7. Francescato D. (2002). Ridere è una cosa seria. Milano: Mondadori.
  8. Francescato D. (1998). Amore e potere. La rivoluzione dei sessi nella coppia e nella società. Milano: Mondadori.
  9. Francescato D. (2011) Amarsi da grandi. Milano: Mondadori.
  10. Francescato D. and Burattini M. (1997). Empowerment e contesti psicoambientali di donne e uomini d’oggi. Roma: Aracne.
  11. Francescato D. e Sorace R. (2006). Quanto è rosa il potere? Psicologia Contemporanea, 197: 16-24.
  12. Francescato D., Mebane M., Sorace R., Giacomantonio M. and Lauriola M. (2008). The construction of two short factor-marker scales measuring women’s perceived obstacles (POS) and women’s coping efficacy (POC) in politics. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 15 (3): 113-133.
  13. Held D. and Mc Grew A. (2007). Governing globalization: Power, authority and global governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  14. Mansbridge J. (2014). What is political science for? Perspectives in Politics, 12: 8-17. DOI: 10.1017/S153759271300368XMazzoleniG.eSfardiniA.(2009).Politicapop.Da“Portaaporta”a“L’isoladeifamosi”.Bologna:ilMulino
  15. Mebane M. (2008). Psicologia delle pari opportunità. Per la promozione del benessere individuale e sociale delle donne. Milano: Unicopli.
  16. Mebane M., Sorace R. e Vecchione M. (2008). La partecipazione politica giovanile: il ruolo delle variabili strutturali, delle determinanti individuali e delle diverse agenize di socializzazione politica. Età Evolutiva (36), 89: 17-27.
  17. Mebane M. e Ajello A. (in corso di valutazione) Comparing two theories on SDO gender invariance with left and right wing political activists.
  18. Phillips A. (1995). The Politics of Presence. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
  19. Reich R. (2012) Beyond Outrage: What has gone wrong with our economy and our democracy and how to fix it. New York: Vintage Books.
  20. Pratto F., Stallworth L.M. and Sidanius J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political dominance and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 49-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.
  21. Schwartz S.H. and Rubel T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Crosscultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89:1010-1028. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.101
  22. Silvester J. & Dykes C. (2007). Selecting political candidates: A longitudinal study of assessment centre performance and political success in the 2005 UK General Election. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80: 11-25. DOI: 10.1348/096317906X15628

Donata Francescato, Poteri monadi e nomadi nell’era della globalizzazione, della personalizzazione e della spettacolarizzazione della politica in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 2/2014, pp 69-79, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2014-002006