Grasping the reality of integrated supply chain in maritime transport: the role of dry-ports in italy

Titolo Rivista ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA
Autori/Curatori Rocco Palumbo
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2014/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 22 P. 97-118 Dimensione file 147 KB
DOI 10.3280/EI2014-002006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This paper discusses the reality of integrated supply chain in maritime transport in Italy, focusing the attention on the dry-port concept. The scientific literature is consistent in conceiving dry-ports as strategic entities to enhance sea-ports’ competitiveness. However, the real contribution of dry-ports to the improvement of sea-ports performance is still poorly examined. To concur in filling such a theoretical and empirical gap, the present study shows a brief literature review about the dry-port concept, which pays particular attention to the role of dry-ports in enhancing the effectiveness of the maritime supply chain. Drawing from the findings of this literature review, an exploratory analysis of Italian dry-ports is depicted. This study suggests that the importance of dry-ports in improving both the competitiveness and the attractiveness of Italian sea-ports is widely overlooked. From this standpoint, Port Authorities are incited to consider dry-ports as strategically relevant within their policies and strategies, thus revisiting their traditional managerial approach which mainly neglects the role of inland terminals.;

Keywords:Dry-ports, supply chain management, SCM; integration, maritime logistics, inland terminals

  1. Acciaro M., McKinnon A. (2013). Efficient hinterland transport infrastructure and services
  2. for large container ports. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, 2013-
  3. 19, available on-line from: http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/jtrc/
  4. DiscussionPapers/DP201319.pdf.
  5. Ambrosino D., Sciomachen A. (2012). How to reduce the impact of containers flow generated
  6. by a maritime terminal on urban transport. In Brebbia C.A., Sustainability
  7. Today. Southampton: WIT Press, 79-88.
  8. Ambrosino D., Sciomachen A. (2014). Location of mid-range dry ports in multimodal
  9. logistic networks. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 108: 118-128,
  10. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.825.
  11. Bask A., Roso V. Andersson D., Hämäläinen E. (2014). Development of seaport-dry port
  12. dyads: two cases from Northern Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 39: 85-95,
  13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.014
  14. Bailey K. (1994). Methods of Social Research, Fourth Edition. New York: The Free Press.
  15. Bergqvist R., Woxenius J. (2011). The Development of Hinterland Transport by Rail – The
  16. Story of Scandinavia and the Port of Gothenburg. The Journal of Interdisciplinary
  17. Economics, 23: 161-175.
  18. Bichou K., Gray R. (2004). A logistics and supply chain management approach to port
  19. performance measurement. Maritime Police & Management, 31, 1: 47-67,
  20. 10.1080/0308883032000174454.
  21. Bowen G.A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative
  22. Research Journal, 9, 2: 27-40, DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
  23. Cantù C. (2011). Riorganizzare i servizi connettivi: il nuovo ruolo degli interporti italiani.
  24. Economia dei Servizi, 2: 281-290.
  25. Carbone V., Gouvernal E. (2007). Supply Chain and Supply Chain Management: appropriate
  26. concepts for maritime studies. Wand J., Oliver D., Nottebbom T., Slack B. (eds).
  27. Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains. London: Ashgate, 11-26.
  28. Chou C.C., Chu C.W., Liang G.S. (2003). Comparison of two models for port choice.
  29. Maritime Quarterly, 12, 3: 45-62.
  30. Cullinane K., Bergqvist R., Wilmsmeier G. (2012). The dry port concept – Theory and practice.
  31. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 14: 1-13, DOI: 10.1057/mel.2011.14
  32. Cullinane K., Wilmsmeier G. (2011). The Contribution of the Dry Port Concept to the
  33. Extension of Port Life Cycles. In Böse J.W. (Ed.). Handbook of Terminal Planning. New
  34. York: Springer, 359-379, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8408-1_18
  35. Dadvar E., Ganji S.R.S., Tanzifi M. (2011). Feasibility of establishment of “Dry Ports” in
  36. the developing countries – the case of Iran. Journal of Transportation Security, 4, 1:
  37. 19-33, DOI: 10.1007/s12198-010-0056-x.DeLangenP.W.(2008).Ensuringhinterlandaccess.TheroleofPortAuthorities
  38. Discussion Paper n. 2008/11. Paris: International Transport Forum.
  39. Do N.-H., Nam K.-C., Ngoc Le Q.-L. (2011). A consideration for developing a dry port system
  40. in Indochina area. Maritime Policy & Management, 38, 1:. 1-9,
  41. 10.1080/03088839.2010.533712.
  42. Fleming D.K., Hauth Y. (1994). Spatial characteristics of transportation hubs: centrality
  43. and intermediacy. Journal of Transport Geography, 2, 1: 3-18, DOI: 10.1016/0966
  44. 6923(94)90030-2.
  45. Hayuth Y. (1981). “Containerization and the Load Center Concept”, Economic Geography,
  46. 57, 2: 160-176, DOI: 10.2307/144140
  47. Jaržemskis A. Vasiliauskas A.V. (2007). Research on dry port concept as intermodal node.
  48. Transport, 22, 3: 207-213.
  49. Jensen A., Bergqvist R. (2013). Seaport strategies for pre-emptive defence of market share
  50. under changing hinterland transport system performance. International Journal of
  51. Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5, 4/5: 432-448, DOI: 10.1504/IJSTL.2013.055274
  52. Lirn T.C., Thanopoulou H.A., Beynon M.J., Beresford A.K. C. (2004). An Application of
  53. AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective. Maritime Economics and
  54. Logistics, 6: 70-91, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100093
  55. Malchow M.B., Kanafani, A. (2001). A disaggregate analysis of port selection,
  56. Transportation Research, 40: 317-337, DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2003.05.001
  57. Marianos N., Lambrou M.A., Nikitakos N., Vaggelas G. (2011). Managing port e-services
  58. in a socio-technical context. International Journal of Shipping and Transport
  59. Logistics, 3, 1: 27-56, DOI: 10.1504/IJSTL.2011.037818
  60. Munford C. (1980). Buenos Aires - congestion and the dry port solution. Cargo Systems
  61. International: The Journal of ICHCA, 7, 10: 26-27.
  62. Murphy P.R., Daley J.M., Dalenberg D.R. (1992). Port selection criteria an application of
  63. a transportation research framework. Logistics and Transportation Review, 28, 3: 237-
  64. 255.
  65. Ng A.K.Y., Liu J. (2014). Port-Focal Logistics and Global Supply Chains. New York:
  66. Palgrave MacMillan.
  67. Ng A., Gujar G.C. (2009). The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences
  68. from Southern India. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 5: 346-356,
  69. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.07.010
  70. Notteboom T.E. (2008). The relationship between seaports and the inter-modal hinterland
  71. in light of global supply chains. Discussion Paper n. 2008/10. International
  72. Transport Forum, Paris.
  73. Notteboom T.E., Rodrigue J.P. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port
  74. development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32, 3: 297-313,
  75. 10.1080/03088830500139885.
  76. Notteboom T.E., Winkelmans, W. (2001). Structural changes in logistics: how will port
  77. authorities face the challenge?. Maritime Policy and Management, 28, 1: 71-89,
  78. 10.1080/03088830119197.
  79. Pires da Cruz M.R., Ferreira J.J., Garrido Azevedo S. (2013). Key factors of seaport competitiveness
  80. based on the stakeholder perspective: An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  81. model. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15: 416-443, DOI: 10.1057/mel.2013.14
  82. Pallis A.A., Vitsounis T.K. (2008). Towards an alternative measurement of port performance:
  83. Externally generated information and users’ satisfaction”. Paper presented at the
  84. International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports. Hong-Kong, March 25th-28th,
  85. 2008. Panigrahia J.K., Pradhanb A. (2012). Competitive maritime policies and strategic dimensions
  86. for commercial seaports in India. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62: 54-67,
  87. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.03.008.
  88. Payne G., Payne J. (2004). Key Concepts in Social Research. London: Sage Publications.
  89. Robinson R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm.
  90. Maritime Policy and Management, 29, 3: 241-255, DOI: 10.1080/03088830210132623
  91. Rodrigue J.-P., Debrie J., Fremont A., Gouvernal E. (2010). Functions and actors of inland
  92. ports: European and North American dynamics. Journal of Transport Geography, 18:
  93. 519-529, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.008
  94. Rodrigue J.-P., Notteboom T. (2009). The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing
  95. port-hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy and Management, 36, 2: 165-
  96. 183, DOI: 10.1080/03088830902861086
  97. Rodrigue J.-P., Notteboom T. (2012). Dry ports in European and North American intermodal
  98. rail systems: Two of a kind?. Research in Transportation Business &
  99. Management, 5: 4-15, DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2012.10.003
  100. Roso V. (2010). Emergence and significance of dry ports. Baltic Transport Journal, 6: 44-45.
  101. Roso V. (2009). The emergence and significance of dry ports: the case of the Port of
  102. Göteborg. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 2, 4: 296-310,
  103. 10.1504/WRITR.2009.026209.
  104. Roso V. (2007). Evaluation of the dry port concept from an environmental perspective: A
  105. note. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12, 7: 523-527,
  106. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.001
  107. Roso V., Lumsden K. (2010). A review of dry ports. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 12:
  108. 196-213, DOI: 10.1057/mel.2010.5
  109. Roso V., Woxenius J., Lumsden K. (2009). The dry port concept: connecting container
  110. seaports with the hinterland. Journal of Transport Geography, 17, 5: 338-345,
  111. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008.
  112. Russo I. (2007). Linee di sviluppo per l’internazionalizzazione di nuove piattaforme logistiche.
  113. Il caso interporti. Sinergie Journal, 73-74: 469-498.
  114. Scott J. (1991). A Matter of Record, Documentary Sources in Social Research. Cambridge:
  115. Polity Press.
  116. Shen C., Lee H., Chou C. (2013). Measuring dynamic competitiveness among container
  117. ports: an autoregressive distributed lag approach. International Journal of Shipping
  118. and Transport Logistics, 5, 6: 637-651, DOI: 10.1504/IJSTL.2013.056855
  119. Tsamboulas D.A., Dimitropoulos I. (1999). Appraisal of investments in European nodal
  120. centres for goods – freight villages: A comparative analysis. Transportation, 26, 4:
  121. 381-398, DOI: 10.1023/A:1005134525773
  122. UIR (2013). Il sistema degli interporti italiani nel 2012. Rome: Unione Interporti Riuniti.
  123. UNCTAD (1991). Handbook on the Management and Operation of Dry Ports. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  124. UNCTAD (1982). Multimodal transport and containerization. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  125. van Klink H.A. (2000). Optimisation of land access to sea ports. Land Access to Sea Ports, Paris: OECD Publications, 121-141.
  126. van Klink H.A., van den Berg G.C. (1998). Gateways and intermodalism. Journal of Transport Geography, 6, 1: 1-9, DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00035-5
  127. Wakeman T. (2008). Marine Transportation of International Freight for the Northeast Corridor. In Warren R. (Ed.). Anticipating 2025 in Northeast Corridor Transportation: Aerial, Highway, Marine, and Rail Technologies & Linkages. Newark (DE): Institute of Public Administration, University of Delaware, 38-59. Yeo G.T., Ng A.K.Y., Lee P.T.V., Yang Z. (2013). Modelling port choice in an uncertain environment. Maritime Policy and Management, 41, 3: 251-267, DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2013.839515
  128. Yuen C.A., Zhang A., Cheung W. (2012). Port competitiveness from the users’ perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries. Research in Transportation Economics, 35: 34-40, DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.11.005
  129. Zhang S., Gao Y., Wei, Z., Jia H. (2012). Study on problems of dry ports planning based on supply chain management. World Automation Congress, 24-28 June. Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.

Rocco Palumbo, Grasping the reality of integrated supply chain in maritime transport: the role of dry-ports in italy in "ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA" 2/2014, pp 97-118, DOI: 10.3280/EI2014-002006