Concern for personal reputation within groups: the effect of accountability and fear of social exclusion

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Stefano Pagliaro, Nicoletta Cavazza, Margherita Guidetti, Francesca Romana Alparone, Valera Amata Giannella
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 11 P. 9-19 Dimensione file 52 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2016-001001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Literature shows that concern for personal reputation varies as a function of both individual and contextual factors, with entitativity of the group to which a person belongs emerging as a key antecedent of individual’s concern for personal reputation. The present research focuses on a further antecedent of the phenomenon, that is, accountability to the group. We presented participants with a high entitative ingroup and manipulated accountability (vs. anonymity) of their response to other ingroup members. Results showed that being accountable to the ingroup determines higher concern for personal reputation, and this relation is mediated by the fear of social exclusion.

La letteratura mostra che la preoccupazione per la reputazione personale varia in funzione di fattori individuali e contestuali: l’entitatività del gruppo al quale un individuo appartiene è risultata essere un antecedente fondamentale della sua preoccupazione per la reputazione. Questa ricerca focalizza l’attenzione su un ulteriore antecedente di questo fenomeno, ovvero la visibilità del proprio comportamento rispetto al gruppo. Abbiamo presentato ai partecipanti una situazione in cui l’ingroup era descritto come molto entitativo e successivamente manipolato la visibilità (vs. l’anonimato) delle loro risposte rispetto agli altri membri del gruppo. I risultati hanno mostrato che, quando le risposte sono visibili agli altri membri del gruppo, le persone si preoccupano maggiormente per la propria reputazione, e questo fenomeno è mediato dalla paura di esclusione sociale

Keywords:Reputazione, paura di esclusione, visibilità

  1. Anderson, C. & Shirako, A. (2008). Are individuals’ reputations related to their history of behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 320 – 333.
  2. Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2000). You can't always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a lowstatus group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891-906.
  3. Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.
  4. Baumeister, R.F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.
  5. Baumeister, R.F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8, 111–121.
  6. Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  7. Bromley, D.B. (1993). Reputation, image and impression management. Oxford, England: John Wiley and Sons.
  8. Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of person as social entities. Behavioural Science, 3, 14–25.
  9. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735–754.
  10. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135–143.
  11. Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., & Pagliaro, S. (2015). Who cares for reputation? Individual differences and concern for reputation. Current Psychology, 34, 164-176.
  12. Cavazza, N., Pagliaro, S., & Guidetti, M. (2014). Antecedents of concern for personal reputation: The role of group entitativity and fear of social exclusion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 365-376.
  13. Crawford, M. & Salaman, L. (2012). Entitativity, identity, and the fulfilment of psychological needs. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 48, 726-730.
  14. De Cremer, D. & Tyler, T.R. (2005). Am I respected or not? Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Social Justice Research, 18, 121-153.
  15. De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1335-1341.
  16. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. Dunbar, R. (2004). The Human Story. Faber and Faber, London.
  17. Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., & Barreto, M. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 160-193.
  18. Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 171–193.
  19. Engelmann, J.M., Over, H., Hermann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16, 952–958.
  20. Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785–791.
  21. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
  22. Gordon, J.P.P. (1989). Individual morality and reputation costs as deterrents to tax evasion. European Economic Review, 33, 797–805.
  23. Hamilton, D.L. & Sherman, S.J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.
  24. Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  25. Higgins, E.T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30; pp. 1-46). New York: Academic.
  26. Jones, D., & Linardi, S. (2014). Wallflowers: Experimental evidence of an aversion to standing out. Management Science, 60, 1757-1771.
  27. Krasnow, M.M., Cosmides, L., Pedersen, E.J., & Tooby, J. (2012). What are punishment and reputation for? PLoS ONE, 7(9): e45662.
  28. Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 34-47.
  29. Leary, M.R. & Baumeister, R.F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62.
  30. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D.L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S.J., & Uhles, A.N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223–246.
  31. Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H.J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Nature, 415, 424–426.
  32. Reinstein, D. & Riener, G. (2012). Reputation and influence in charitable giving: an experiment. Theory and Decision, 72, 221–243.
  33. Semmann, D., Krambeck, H.J., & Milinski, M. (2005). Reputation is valuable within and outside one’s own social group. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57, 611–616.
  34. Stiff, C. & Van Vugt, M. (2008). The power of reputations: The role of third party information in the admission of new group members. Group Dynamics, 12, 155–166.
  35. Thibaut, J.W. & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
  36. Tyler, T.R. & Blader, S.L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  37. Van Vugt, M. & Hardy, C.L. (2010). Cooperation for reputation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 101-111.
  38. Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P.A. (2015). When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 923-930.
  39. Ybarra, O., Park, H., Stanik, C., & Lee, D.S. (2012). Self-judgment and reputation monitoring as a function of the fundamental dimensions, temporal perspective, and culture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 200 – 209.

  • Conservation as Integration: Desire to Belong as Motivation for Environmental Conservation Stacey Mac Donald, Henk Staats, in Society & Natural Resources /2022 pp.75
    DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2021.2023244
  • What is known about personal reputation? A systematic literature review M. Victoria Carrillo-Durán, Ramsés Cabrera-Gala, Laura B. Sánchez-Baltasar, in Heliyon e15680/2023 pp.e15680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15680

Stefano Pagliaro, Nicoletta Cavazza, Margherita Guidetti, Francesca Romana Alparone, Valera Amata Giannella, Concern for personal reputation within groups: the effect of accountability and fear of social exclusion in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2016, pp 9-19, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2016-001001