New trends in the debate on geographical indications: evidence from Ecuador

Author/s Katia L. Sidali, Nelson R. Granja Toledo, Alvaro Monteros Altamirano, Mirian Sanchez Fernandez, Maria del Rosario Mejía, Wilson Usina
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/1
Language English Pages 14 P. 39-52 File size 111 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2016-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Geographical Indications (GIs) are names of regions, specific places or, in exceptional cases, countries, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff (EC 510/2006, Art. 2). They have received much attention in recent years not only at the European level, where they stem from, but also at different international forums such as at the World Trade Organization (wto). Being a particular form of intellectual property, these certification schemes have the potential to be applied also to non-agrifood commodities or even services. Furthermore, due to the grave menace of biodiversity loss caused by globalization, GIs could serve as a tool to promote biodiversity if linked to plant varieties or animal species in danger of disappearance. It seems that at European level these issues are gathering momentum. For this reason, the purpose of this paper is to support new interpretations regarding GI legislation. In the remainder of this paper, the authors will present a short description of GIs as they have been discussed at different international forums. Also, the innovative implementation of GIs in Ecuador will be illustrated by means of two examples: the Sombrero of Montecristi and the cacao Nacional Arriba. Based on these examples we trace possible scenarios of GI implementation in a particular type of service economy such as food tourism. In the final part, some conclusions will be presented.

Keywords: Geographical Indications, local culture, biodiversity, Ecuador, niche products, extension, GI protection

Jel codes: D23, D18, P14

  1. Sidali, K.L. & Spiller, A. (2014) Cultural property rights in the EU geographical indications’ system: Cui prodest? Economia Agro-Alimentare, 16(2), 95-102. DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2014-002006
  2. Stoler, M. (2012). El justo sabor del cacao: Desafíos y ventajas del comercio justo del cacao. Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar Sede Ecuador. Thesis Msc. 127p.
  3. Thual, D. & Lossy, F. (2011). Q&A Manual European Legislation on Geographical Indications: IPR2.
  4. Van Zonneveld, T.E., Loo, M., Hodgkin T.J., Galluzzi, G. & van Etten, J. (2012). Present Spatial Diversity Patterns of Theobroma cacao L. in the Neotropics Reflect Genetic Differentiation in Pleistocene Refugia Followed by Human-Influenced Dispersal. PLoS ONE, Vol. 7, Issue 10, e47676.
  5. Wilkinson, J., & Cerdan, C. (2011). A Brazilian perspective on geographical indications. In Territorial Governance (pp. 143-158). Physica-Verlag HD.
  6. Winkel T. (2013). Ecuador and cacao an old alliance. A Peace Corp Master International Project. Colorado State University. Msc. Project.
  7. Alcivar Trejo, C.A., Calderón Cisneros, J.T. & López, K.S. (2015). La ruta del cacao, modelo de aporte al desarrollo socio-turístico y económico de las comunidades ecuatorianas. Revista Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, Ecuador, (feb. 2015), online publication:
  8. Arfini, F., Belletti, G. & Marescotti, A. (2010). Prodotti tipici e denominazioni geografiche. Strumenti di tutela e valorizzazione. Quaderni.
  9. Biocomercio. 2005. Estrategia del Cacao Sabor “Arriba” 2006-2008. Sector de Ingredientes Naturales para la Industria Alimenticia. btfp, United Nations Conference on Trade and Developmente. Biocomercio Sostenible. 12 p.
  10. Boa, E, Bentley, J. & Stonehouse, J. (2000). Cacao and neighbour trees in Ecuador. How and Why farmers manage trees for shade and other purposes. Cabi international. 45 p.
  11. Buchet, M., Doherty, J. & Hoepffner, B. (1995). Panama: a legendary hat. Editions Assouline.
  12. Chiluiza, V.H. & Rodriguez, M. (2003). El Sombrero de Paja Toquilla como Atractivo Cultural y su Propuesta: La Ruta del Sombrero, Master thesis, espol, Guayaquil-Ecuador, 2003.
  13. De Souza, C.G. (2012). An overview of geographical indications in Brazil. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17, 133-140.
  14. El Comercio (2014ª). El Cacao Ecuatoriano huele a 700 US millones. Publicación diario el Comercio Ecuador. 13 nov 2014.
  15. El Comercio (2014b). El cacao CCN-51 pasó de patito feo a cisne de la producción ecuatoriana. Published 7 mayo 2014.
  16. Escobar Ebell, L.A., Torres Cortez, J.C. & Vera Moscoso, S.C. (2012). Geographical indications under the Andean community as a proposal for an inclusive business model in the region.
  17. fao-iica (2008). Calidad de los alimentos vinculada al origen y las tradiciones en América Latina: estudios de casos. Ed. por Hernando Riveros, Emilie Vandecandelaere, Florence Tartanac, Claudia Ruiz y Gina Pancorbo. Lima. pp. 94-119.
  18. Gobierno del Estado de México (gem), (2006): Plan Estatal de Desarrollo 2005-2011. México: gem.
  19. Huang, C.H., Tsaur, J.R., & Yang, C.H. (2012). Does world heritage list really induce more tourists? Evidence from Macau. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1450-1457.
  20. Loor, R.G., Risterucci, A.M., Courtois, B., Fouet O., Jeanneau, M., Rosenquist, E., Amores, F., Vasco, A., Medina, M., Lanaud, C. (2009). Tracing the native ancestors of the modern Theobroma cacao L. population in Ecuador. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 5, 421-433.
  21. Loor-Solorzano R.G., Fouet O., Lemainque A., Pavek S. & Boccara M. (2012). Insight into the Wild Origin, Migration and Domestication History of the Fine Flavour Nacional Theobroma cacao L. Variety from Ecuador. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e48438. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048438.
  22. origin Report (2013), January 2013.
  23. Paguay, J. (2012). De la pepa de Oro a la ruta del cacao. Revista Res Non Verba. Universidad ecotec (agosto 2012)., 37-52.
  24. Proaño, R., Jessy, C., & Viera Ramírez, J.I. (2009). Proyecto de factibilidad para la creación del Centro Turístico Laguna Verde (Quilotoa) Parroquia Zumbahua del cantón Pujilí, Provincia de Cotopaxi.
  25. proecuador (2013). Análisis del sector cacao y elaborados. Intelegencia Comercial e inversiones. 39p.
  26. Profeta, A., Balling, R., Schoene, V. & Wirsig, A. (2009). The Protection of Origins for Agricultural Products and Foods in Europe: Status Quo, Problems and Policy Recommendations for the Green Book. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 12(6), 622-648.
  27. Querette, E., Guilherme, C. & Targino, P. (2013). Local Institutions, Culture and Competitiveness: Leveraging Porto Digital’s Reputation through a Geographical Indication of Software. Paper presented at the iasp 30th Conference on science and technology parks, Recife.
  28. Querette, E., Saboya, F., Molina, A., Calheiros, G., Targino, P., Ourem, H. & do Apolo, R. (2009). Porto Digital: a model of implementing a Technology Park as a driver for economic development. CEP, 50, 220.
  29. Ramirez, M., Nicklin, C., Williams, D.E., Williams, K.A., Tapia, C. & Carrera, V.H. (2008). Promotion of Andean Crops for Rural Development in Ecuador, available at: sites/default/files/publication/files/4225.pdf.

  • Patrimonios alimentarios en América Latina María Gabriela Zurita-Benavides, Anne Schwarz, Álvaro Monteros Altamirano, María Cristina Peñuela-Mora, pp.59 (ISBN:9786124358081)

Katia L. Sidali, Nelson R. Granja Toledo, Alvaro Monteros Altamirano, Mirian Sanchez Fernandez, Maria del Rosario Mejía, Wilson Usina, New trends in the debate on geographical indications: evidence from Ecuador in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 1/2016, pp 39-52, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2016-001003