Innovation and sustainability in agri-food companies: The role of quality

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Flavio Boccia, Daniela Covino
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 11 P. 131-141 Dimensione file 154 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2016-001010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Usually the agri-food system is seen as a field characterized by low research and development expenditure, owing to its generally recognized nature of mature and relatively low technology industry, but changes in international competitiveness have now provided strong incentive to innovate, both for small and medium-sized enterprises and big companies. Regards to quality, studies focused on innovations are related to aspects such as novelty, variety, processing, origin, convenience. The aim of the work is to understand if the innovation in products’ quality and sustainability can help the success of agri-food enterprises on international markets. The used methodology is a prevalently qualitative direct investigation in two important companies, which are a symbol of Italian and French agri-business respectively and an example of a business model related to innovation and sustainability in quality. Even if it is possible furtherly to investigate in this matter, the study underlines the main role of innovation in sustainable food quality and its capacity to help enterprise to win in the modern global competition.

Gli odierni cambiamenti nella competitività internazionale hanno dato un forte incentivo a innovare, non solo alle grandi aziende, ma anche alle piccole e medie imprese. Lo scopo del lavoro è quello di capire se l’innovazione in termini di qualità e di sostenibilità dei prodotti può aiutare il successo delle imprese agroalimentari sui mercati internazionali. La metodologia utilizzata è l’indagine diretta qualitativa in due importanti aziende, che sono un simbolo dell’agrobusiness italiano e francese rispettivamente, nonché un esempio sintomatico in termini di innovazione mirata all’incremento di qualità e sostenibilità dei prodotti alimentari. Lo studio, suscettibile di ulteriori approfondimenti, evidenzia il ruolo principale dell’innovazione ai fini di una qualità alimentare sostenibile e il suo contributo nell’aiutare un'impresa a vincere nella moderna competizione globale.

Keywords:Competitività, consumatore, marketing, multinazionale, sicurezza, strategia.

  1. Abbott A., Appoloni S., Bader M., (2008). Procès agro-alimentaires: instrumentation, automatisation. Reinach: Éditeur Endress-Hauser.
  2. Aghion P., David P.A., Foray D. (200). Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: linking policy research and practice in ‘STIG Systems’. Research Policy, 38 (4): 681-693.
  3. Ajzen I., Albarracin D., Hornik R. (2007). Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Aurier P., Sirieix L. (2004). Le marketing des produits agroalimentaires. Paris: Édition Dunod.
  5. Avermaete T., Viaene J., Morgan E.J., Crawford N. (2003). Determinants of innovation in small food firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6 (1): 8-17.
  6. Bech-Larsen T., Nielsen N.A. (1999). A comparison of five elicitation techniques for elicitation of attributes of low involvement products. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20 (3): 315-341.
  7. Boccia F. (2016). Consumer perception: an analysis on second generation genetically modified foods. Nutrition and Food Science, 46, 5.
  8. Boccia F. (2015). Genetically Modified Organisms: What Issues in the Italian Market? Quality – Access to Success, 16 (145): 105-110.
  9. Boccia F., Sarnacchiaro P. (2015). Genetically Modified Foods and Consumer Perspective. Recent Patents on Food, Nutrition & Agriculture, 7 (1): 28-34.
  10. Boccia F., Ianuario S., Sarno V. (2013). The Italian environmental performance: the role of Ecosystem Vitality. Quality – Access to Success, 14 (137): 95-100.
  11. Boccia F., Sarnacchiaro P. (2013). The Italian consumer and genetically modified food. Quality – Access to Success, 14 (136): 105-108.
  12. Boccia F., Sarno V. (2013). Consumer perception and corporate social responsibility: An explorative survey on food Italian market. Quality – Access to Success, 14 (132): 110-112.
  13. Casella A. (2001). Product Standards and International Trade: Harmonization through Private Coalisations? Kyklos, 54: 243-264.
  14. Chevassus-Lozza E., Gallezot J., Galliano D. (2005). External versus internal markets of the multinational enterprise: intrafirm trade in French multinational agribusiness. Rama, R., Multinational Agribusinesses, Haworth Press, NY.
  15. Cousteaux M. (1998). Les industries agro-alimentaires en Midi-Pyrénées: l'industrie des conserves et des plats cuisinés. Éditeur Conseil Économique et Social Régional Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse.
  16. Covino D. (2014). Health, Rights and European Legislation on GM Food. Quality – Access to Success, 15 (142): 98-100.
  17. Covino D., Boccia F. (2014) Environmental management and global trade’s effects. Quality – Access to Success, 15 (138): 79-83.
  18. Covino D., Boccia F., Cesaretti G.P. (2013). Globalizzazione e regole per la sostenibilità del benessere | [Globalization and rules for well-being sustainability]. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 1: 93-107.
  19. Covino D., Boccia F., Sarno V. (2013). Global warming and environmental agreements. Quality – Access to Success, 14, suppl. 1: 41-45.
  20. Covino D. (2011). Un approccio sistemico alla dimensione ambientale dello sviluppo sostenibile | [A systemic approach to environmental dimension of sustainable development]. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 1: 65-72.
  21. Covino D., Boccia F., Di Donato S., Regazzi D. (2008). Qualità e sicurezza nei sistemi agroalimentari: Innovazioni tecnologiche ed economiche | [Food quality and safety in agro-food system: Economic and technological innovations]. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 3, 1 suppl.: 173-190.
  22. Dony M., Mahieu S., Merten-Lentz K. (2013). Sécurité alimentaire: nouveaux enjeux et perspectives. Bruxelles: Éditeur Bruylant.
  23. Esposti R. (2002). Public agricultural R&D design and techological spill-ins. A dynamic model. Research Policy, 31 (5): 693-717.
  24. Fulponi L. (2006). Private Voluntary Standards in the Food System: The Perspective of MajorFood Retailers in OECD Countries. Food Policy, 31 (1): 1-13.
  25. Fulponi F. (2004). Changing food lifestyles: emerging consumer corcerns. AgriRegioniEuropa.
  26. Guerrero L., Guàrdia M.D., Xicola J., Verbeke W., Vanhonacker F., Zakowska-Biemans S., Sajdakowska M., Rossè C.S., Issanchou S., Contel M., Scalvedi M.L., Granli B.S., Hersleth M. (2009). Consumer-driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods. A qualitative cross-cultural study. Appetite, 52 (2): 345-354.
  27. Heyder M., Makus C., Theuvsen L. (2011). Internationalization and Firm Performance in Agribusiness: Empirical Evidence from European Cooperatives. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 2 (1): 35-48.
  28. Maat J. (2005). European techology platform on food for life. The vision for 2020 and beyond. Bruxelles: CCIA.
  29. Meixner O., Knoll V. (2015). Integrating price promotions into the switch of brands model for approximating variety-seeking behaviour. British Food Journal, 2 (117): 588-603.
  30. Mohnem P., Mairesse J., Deganais M. (2006). Innovativity: a comparison across seven European countries. Working Paper 12280, Cambridge, MA.
  31. Nill J., Kemp R. (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38 (4): 668-680.
  32. Pomarici E., Boccia F., Catapano D. (2012). The wine distribution systems over the world: An explorative survey. New Medit, 11 (4): 23-32.
  33. Sarno V., Ardeleanu M.P. (2014). Information management and consumer behavior towards GMOs. Quality – Access to Success, 15 (138): 93-99.
  34. Sarno V., Barmo M. (2014). Sustainability management in the agri-food companies: a practical guide. Quality – Access to Success, 15 (141): 96-99.
  35. Van Rijswijk W., Frewer L.J., Menozzi D., Faioli G. (2008). Consumer perceptions of traceability: A cross-national comparison of associated benefits. Food Quality and Preference, 19 (5): 452-464.

  • Digital and Green Behaviour: An Exploratory Study on Italian Consumers Nadia Palmieri, Flavio Boccia, Daniela Covino, in Sustainability /2024 pp.3459
    DOI: 10.3390/su16083459
  • Eating Hamburgers Slowly and Sustainably: The Fast Food Market in North-West Italy Alessandro Bonadonna, Simona Alfiero, Massimo Cane, Edyta Gheribi, in Agriculture /2019 pp.77
    DOI: 10.3390/agriculture9040077
  • Neuromarketing: some remarks by an economic experiment on food consumer perception and ethic sustainability Daniela Covino, Immacolata Viola, Tetiana Paientko, Flavio Boccia, in RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA' 1/2021 pp.187
    DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-001011
  • Social Responsibility Flavio Boccia, Daniela Covino, (ISBN:978-1-78923-442-8)
  • Customer Satisfaction and Sustainability Initiatives in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Alessandro Bonadonna, Chiara Giachino, Francesca Pucciarelli, Bernardo Bertoldi, pp.251 (ISBN:9781799814191)
  • Greenwashing perception and attitude-intention relationship towards green products purchase: a mediating model Kritika Gupta, Navjit Singh, in Environment, Development and Sustainability /2024
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05486-5
  • Consumer behavior and corporate social responsibility: An evaluation by a choice experiment Flavio Boccia, Rosa Malgeri Manzo, Daniela Covino, in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management /2019 pp.97
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.1661
  • INNOVATIONS IN THE FOODSERVICE BUSINESS IN LARGE POLISH CITIES Edyta Gheribi, Gultekin Altuntas, Alessandro Bonadonna, in Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia /2018 pp.59
    DOI: 10.22630/ASPE.2018.17.4.52
  • Genetically modified and socially responsible foods: A significant relationship for consumer's preferences Daniela Covino, Flavio Boccia, Immacolata Viola, in RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA' 2/2022 pp.371
    DOI: 10.3280/RISS2021-002024
  • Shop green, feel good: How sustainable fashion boosts gen Z’s wellbeing? Jihad Mohammad, Nur Zulaikha Mohamed Sadom, Farzana Quoquab, in Environment, Development and Sustainability /2024
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05450-3
  • Handbook of Environmental Materials Management Flavio Boccia, Daniela Covino, pp.1 (ISBN:978-3-319-58538-3)
  • Nutraceuticals: Some remarks by a choice experiment on food, health and new technologies Flavio Boccia, Gennaro Punzo, in Food Research International 108888/2020 pp.108888
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108888
  • Handbook of Nutraceuticals and Natural Products Sunil Bishnoi, Deepak Mudgil, pp.189 (ISBN:9781119746799)
  • Understanding the role of awareness and trust in consumer purchase decisions for healthy food and products Ali Firoozzare, Flavio Boccia, Nazanin Yousefian, Sima Ghazanfari, Somayyeh Pakook, in Food Quality and Preference 105275/2024 pp.105275
    DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105275

Flavio Boccia, Daniela Covino, Innovation and sustainability in agri-food companies: The role of quality in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2016, pp 131-141, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2016-001010