Factors affecting whistleblowing effectiveness as internal control mechanism

Author/s Davide Rizzotti, sebastiano Lombardo
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/3 Language Italian
Pages 18 P. 9-26 File size 610 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2016-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In order to enhance internal control effectiveness in detecting frauds, Anglo-Saxon firms are developing internal whistleblowing channels and procedures. Some attempts also exist in the Italian context. With our study we discuss about factors affecting the effectiveness of these procedures in an unfavorable context, such the Italian one, characterized by cultural peculiarities. We experimentally observe the intentions of subjects to report fraud using the internal channel and we explore the effect of evidence strength and internal monetary rewards. Across treatments, we find that evidence strengths are not able, alone, to stimulate subjects to report fraud using the internal channel while internal monetary rewards appear to better motivate whistleblowing. The stronger effect of monetary rewards compared to evidence strengths is a concern that must be carefully taken into account in designing effective internal fraud reporting procedures, in order to avoid opportunistic behaviors of informers without weakening whistleblowing effectiveness.

Keywords: Whistleblowing effectiveness, internal control, evidence strength, rewards; fraud.

  1. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2014), Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Austin, TX, ACFE.
  2. Ellison F., Keenan J., Lockhart P., Schaick J. (1985), Whistleblowing Research: Methodological and Moral Issues, New York, Praeger Publishers.
  3. Agoglia C.P., Beaudoin C., Tsakumis G.T. (2009), The effect of documentation structure and task-specific experience on auditors’ ability to identify control weaknesses, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21, 1, pp. 1-17.
  4. Allegrini M., a cura di (2008), Il Controllo interno nei gruppi aziendali, Milano, Mc Graw-Hill.
  5. Arena M., Azzone G. (2009), Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness, International Journal of Auditing, 13, 1, pp. 43-60.
  6. Arruñada B. (2009), Protestant and Catholics: similar work ethic, different social ethic, The Economic Journal, 120, pp. 890-918.
  7. Azzali S., Mazza T. (2011), La valutazione degli Information Technology Controls nell’ambito di sistemi di controllo interno: I risultati di una ricerca empirica, Management Control, 3, pp. 91-118. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-003005
  8. Barnett T. (1992), A preliminary investigation of the relationship between selected organization characteristics and external whistleblowing by employees, Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 12, pp. 949-959. DOI: 10.1007/BF00871961
  9. Bedard J.C., Denis D.R., Curtis M.B., Jenkins J.G. (2008), Risk monitoring and control in audit firms: A research synthesis, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 27, 1, pp. 187-218.
  10. Berry B. (2004), Organizational culture: A framework and strategies for facilitating employee whistleblowing, Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16, 1, pp. 1-11.
  11. Brink A.G., Lowe D.J., Victoravich L.M. (2013), The effect of evidence strength and internal rewards on intentions to report fraud in the Dodd-Frank regulatory environment, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32, 3, pp. 87-104.
  12. Callahan E.S., Collins J.W. (1992), Employee attitudes toward whistleblowing: Management and public policy implications, Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 12, pp. 939-948.
  13. DOI: 10.1007/BF00871960
  14. Callahan E.S., Dworkin T.M. (1992), Do Good and Get Rich: Financial Incentives for Whistleblowing and the False Claims Act, Villanova Law Review, 37, 2, pp. 273-336.
  15. Carcello J.V., Hermanson D.R., Ye Z. (2011), Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30, 3, pp. 1-31.
  16. Chiu R.K. (2003), Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control, Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 1/2, pp. 65-74.
  17. DOI: 10.1023/A:102291121520
  18. Cohen J.R., Pant L.W., Sharp D.J. (2001), An examination of differences in ethical decision making between Canadian business Students and accounting professionals, Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 4, pp. 319-336. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010745425675
  19. Comoli M. (2002), I sistemi di controllo interno nella corporate governance, Milano, Egea.
  20. Cortesi A., Tettamanzi P., Corno F. (2009), Empirical evidence on internal control systems and corporate governance in Italy, Journal of Management & Governance, 13, 1-2, pp. 75-100.
  21. Davidson W.N., Worrell D.L. (1988), The impact of announcements of corporate illegalities on shareholder returns, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 1, pp. 195-200.
  22. D’Onza G. (2013), L'internal auditing. Profili organizzativi, dinamica di funzionamento e creazione del valore, Torino, Giappichelli.
  23. Deci, E.L., Koestner R., Ryan R.M. (1999), A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3, pp. 195-200.
  24. Deloitte (2011), SEC sets final whistleblower rules. Hot Topics, In: http://www.iasplus.com/en-us/publications/us/hot-topics/2011/june/at_download/file/SEC%20Sets%20Final%20Whistleblower%20Rules%20(June%202011)%20.pdf.
  25. Dworkin T.M., Bacus M.S. (1998), Internal versus external whistleblowers: A comparison of whistleblowing process, Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 12, pp. 1281-1298.
  26. DOI: 10.1023/A:100591621058
  27. Dyck A., Morse A., Zingales L. (2010), Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? Journal of Finance, 65, 6, pp. 2213-2253.
  28. Feldman Y., Lobel O. (2010), The incentives matrix: The comparative effectiveness of rewards, liabilities, duties, and protection for reporting illegality, Texas Law Review, 88, 6, pp. 1151-1211.
  29. Fraschini G., Parisi N., Rinoldi D., a cura di (2011), Il whistleblowing. Nuovo strumento di lotta alla corruzione, Catania, Bonanno.
  30. Hooks K.L., Kaplan S.E., Schultz J.J. Jr. (1994), Enhancing communication to assist in fraud prevention and detection, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 2, pp. 86-117.
  31. Ingrassia R. (2009), Il whistle-blowing come strumento di controllo interno delle organizzazioni, Studi Organizzativi, 2, 9, 40-70.
  32. Kaplan S.E. (1995), An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions upon discovery of procedures prematurely signed-off, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 14, 2, pp. 90-104.
  33. Kaplan S.E., Whitecotton S.M. (2001), An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 20, 1, pp. 45-64.
  34. Kaplan S.E., Pany K., Samuels J.A., Zhang J. (2009), An examination of the effects of procedural safeguards on intentions to anonymously report fraud, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28, 2, pp. 237-288.
  35. Kaplan S.E., Pope K.R., Samuels J.A. (2010), The effect of social confrontation on individuals’ intentions to internally report fraud, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22, 2, pp. 51-67.
  36. Kaptein M. (2011), From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee response to observed wrongdoing, Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 3, pp. 513-530.
  37. Lamboglia R. (2010), Un modello sistemico dell’ambiente di controllo, Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale, 110, 7/8, pp. 83-90.
  38. Lamboglia R. (2011), Un’analisi della letteratura sulla valutazione del sistema di controllo interno: stato dell’arte e prospettive future, Management Control, 2, pp. 105-131.
  39. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-002006.
  40. Lamboglia R., D’Onza G. (2013), Un modello di gestione del rischio reputazionale. Dall’identificazione al fronteggiamento, Management Control, 3, pp. 7-34.
  41. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-003002
  42. Marchi L. (2011), Integrazione pubblico-privato su metodologie e strumenti di controllo gestionale, Management Control, 2, pp. 5-8. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-002001
  43. Miceli, M.P., Near J.P. (1985), Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decision, Personnel Psychology 38, pp. 525-544.
  44. Miceli M.P., Near J.P. (1994), Whistleblowing: Reaping the benefits, Academy of Management Executive, 8, 3, pp. 65-72. DOI: 10.5465/AME.1994.9503101177
  45. Miceli M.P., Near J.P., Dworkin T.M. (2008), Whistleblowing in Organizations, New York, Routledge.
  46. Miceli M.P., Near J.P., Dworkin T.M. (2009), A word to wise: How managers and policy makers can encourage employee to report wrongdoing, Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 3, pp. 379-396.
  47. Miraglia R.A. (2012), Editoriale. Nuove tendenze nei sistemi di controllo e di misurazione delle performance, Management Control, 2, pp. 5-14.
  48. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2012-002001
  49. Near J.P., Miceli M.P. (1985), Organizational dissidence: The case of whistleblowing, Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1, pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF00382668
  50. Near J.P., Miceli M.P. (1996), Whistleblowing: Myth and reality, Journal of Management, 22, 3, pp. 507-526. DOI: 10.1177/014920639602200306
  51. Phillips J.R., Cohen M.L. (2011), False Claims Act: History of the Law. Tratto da: http://www.phillipsandcohen.com/Qui-Tam-Whistleblowers/US-False-Claims-Act.shtml.
  52. PriceWaterhouse Coopers (2004), Il sistema di controllo interno. Un modello integrato di riferimento per la gestione dei rischi aziendali, Milano, Il Sole 24 Ore.
  53. Patel C. (2003), Some Cross‐Cultural Evidence on Whistle‐Blowing as an Internal Control Mechanism, Journal of International Accounting Research, 2, pp. 69-96.
  54. Ponemon L.A. (1994), Comment: Whistleblowing as an internal control mechanism: Individual and organizational considerations, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 2, pp. 118-130.
  55. Rizza, L. (2013), La tutela del dipendente pubblico ex art . 1 comma 51 legge n. 190/2012. Diffondere la cultura del whistleblowing per un’efficace lotta alla corruzione, Università degli Studi di Catania in collaborazione con Centro di Documentazione Europea d’Ateneo, Online Working Paper/ISSN 1973-7696. URL: http://www.cde.unict.it/quadernieuropei/giuridiche/58_2013.pdf .
  56. Trevino L.K., Victor B. (1992), Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1, pp. 38-64. DOI: 10.2307/256472
  57. U.S. House of Representatives (2002), Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law 107-204 [H.R. 3736], Washington DC, Government Printing Office.
  58. U.S. House of Representatives (2010), Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act. Public Law 111-203 [H.R. 4173], Washington DC, Government Printing Office.
  59. Victor B., Trevino L.K., Shapiro D.L. (1993), Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors, Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 4, 253-263. DOI: 10.1007/BF01666528
  60. Worth M. (2013), Whistleblowing in Europe: Legal Protections for Whistleblowers in EU, Berlino, Transparency International.

  • Corporate social responsibility and technological perspectives in healthcare: An exploratory analysis of the evolution of the anti‐corruption system through multiple case studies Maura Campra, Paolo Esposito, Valerio Brescia, in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management /2023 pp.2816
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.2517

Davide Rizzotti, sebastiano Lombardo, Fattori influenti sull’efficacia del whistleblowing come strumento di controllo interno in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2016, pp 9-26, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-003002