Nation-World: Autarky and Geo-economics in Montchrétien’s Traicté

Titolo Rivista HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY
Autori/Curatori Rosario Patalano
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 14 P. 85-98 Dimensione file 199 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2016-002006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In his Traicté de l’oeconomie politique (1615), Antoine de Montchrétien proposed a model of development, based on an autarkic economy, formulating analytical and political alternative to increasing integration of world trade, which in the seventeenth century was under Dutch and English hegemony. Montchrétien’s response to the problem of world trade integration focused on the establishment of a French colonial empire, completely self-sufficient and closed to international trade. Montchrétien proposed an “economic nationalism” connecting politics and the economy, in a perspective that would be called geo-economic, pitting nationalism against globalization to avoid the failure in international trade competition that could threaten the political survival and independence of the country’s national interests. This paper explores the analytical frameworks of Montchrétien’s autarkic model, which constitutes an exception in the 17th century literature, which is focused on the idea of commercial supremacy and the gains of trade in a context of international competition.

Keywords:Antoine de Montchrétien, Geo-economics, autarkic economy, world trade in the 17th century.

Jel codes:B110, B310, F130, N100

  1. Bairoch P. (1971). Le Tiers-Monde dans l’impasse. Le démmarrage économique du XVIIe au XXe siècle , Paris, Editions Gallimard.
  2. Billacois F. (1999). Introduction to Montchrétien, Antoine de, Traicté de l’oeconomie politique, critical edition by F. Billacois, ed., Généve, Librairie Droz.
  3. Bodin J. (1578). Les Paradoxes du seigneur de Malestroit... Avec la réponse de Jean Bodin...Reveue corrigée et augmentée de nouveau, par ledit Bodin, Paris, Chez Martin le Jeune.
  4. Bonolas P. (1987). Les Fondements historiques et moraux de la pensée politique de Montchrestien, Cahiers de littérature du XVIIe siècle, 9: 44-7.
  5. Botero G. (1588). Delle cause della grandezza delle città, Roma, in Botero (1948).
  6. Botero G. (1948). Della Ragion di Stato, edited by L. Firpo, Torino, Utet
  7. Braudel F. and E. Labrousse (eds.)(1970). Histoire économique et sociale de la France, II. Vol. Des derniers temps de l’âge seigneurial aux préludes de l’âge industriel (1660-1789). Paris, Presses Univ. de France.
  8. Brazeau B. (2009). Writing a New France, 1604-1632: Empire and Early Modern French Identity. Farnham, Ashgate.
  9. Bulut M. (2003). Rethinking the Dutch Economy and Trade in the Early Modem Period 1570-1680, The Journal of the European Economic History, 2: 391-424.
  10. Canny N. and P. Morgan (eds.)(2011). The Oxford Handbook of The Atlantic World, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  11. Cole W.C. (1931). French Mercantilist Doctrines before Colbert, New York, Richard R. Smith.
  12. Davids K. And J. Lucassen (1995). A Miracle Mirrored: The Dutch Republic in European Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Dessaix P. (1901). Montchrétien et l’économie politique nationale, Paris, A. Pedone.
  14. Dobb M. (1950). Studies in the Development of Capitalism, fourth impression, London, Routledge.
  15. Dockès P. (1971). L’éspace dans la pensée économique du XVIe au XVIIIe siècle. Nouvelle Bibliothèque Scientifique, Paris, Flammarion.
  16. Duval J. (1869). Mémoire sur Antoine de Montchrétien, Sieur de Vateville auteur du premier traité d’économie politique, Paris, Guillamin.
  17. Funck-Brentano T. (1889). Introduction to Montchrétien, Antoine de, Traicté de l’oeconomie politique, critical edition by Thomas Funck-Brentano, Paris, Libraire Plon.
  18. Goubert P. (1970). Le tragique XVIIe siècle. In Braudel and Labrousse (1970): 329-65.
  19. Hobsbawm E.J. (1960). The Seventeenth Century in the Development of Capitalism, Science and Society, XXIV, 2, Spring: 97-112.
  20. Hirschman A.O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.
  21. Hont I. (2005). Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-state in Historical Perspective, Cambridge (Mass.) – London: Harvard University Press.
  22. Huizinga J.H. (1968). Dutch Civilization in the Seventeenth Century, and Other Essays, London, Collins.
  23. Israel J.I. (1989). Dutch Primacy in World Trade, 1585-1740, Oxford, Claredon Press.
  24. Israel J.I. (1995). The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall, 1477-1806, Oxford History of Early Modern Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  25. Joly A. (1865). Antoine de Montchrétien: poète et économiste normand, Genève, Slatkine.
  26. King J.E. (1948). The Origin of the Term Political Economy, Journal of Modern History, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Sep.): 230-1.
  27. List F. (1841). Das Nationale System der Politischen Ökonomie, Stuttgart und Tübingen, English Translation: The National System of Political Economy, translated by G.A. Matile, Philadelphia, J.B Lippincott, 1856. Maifreda G. (2012). From Oikonomia to Political Economy: Constructing Economic Knowledge from the Renaissance to the Scientific Revolution, Burlington, Ashgate.
  28. Marzagalli S. (2011). The French Atlantic World in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, in Canny and Morgan (2011): 235-51.
  29. Mayerne L. Turquet de (1611). La monarchie aristo-démocratique, ou Le gouvernement composé et meslé des trois formes de légitimes républiques: aux Estats-généraux des provinces confédérées des Pays-Bas, Paris, chez Jean Berjon et Jean le Bouc.
  30. Montchrétien A. de, or Montchrestien, A. de (1615). Traicté de l’oeconomie politique: dédié en 1615 au Roy et à la Reyne mère du Roy par Antoyne de Montchrétien, Rouen, Jean Osmont. New Edition with introd. and notes by Th. Funck-Brentano, Paris, Plon, 1889; critical edition by F. Billacois, ed., Généve, Libraries Droz, 1999.
  31. Patalano R. And Reinert S.A. (2016). Antonio Serra and the Economics of Good Government, London, Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Prak M. (2005). The Dutch Republic in the Seventeenth Century: The Golden Age, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  33. Reinert S.A. (2014). Rivalry: Greatness in Early Modern Political Economy, in Stern and Wennerlind (eds.)(2014): 348-370.
  34. Riley J.C. (1984). The Dutch Economy After 1650: Decline or Growth? The Journal of the European Economic History, 3: 521-69.
  35. Serra A. (1613). Breve trattato delle cause, che possono far abbondare li Regni d’oro, et argento. Dove non sono miniere. Con applicatione al Regno di Napoli. Del dottor Antonio Serra della città di Cosenza. Diviso in tre parti, Napoli: appresso Lazzaro Scorriggio, English Translation “A Short Treatise on the Wealth and Poverty of Nations”, translated by Jonathan Hunt, edited and with an introduction by Sophus A. Reinert, London – New York – Delhi, Anthem Press, 2011.
  36. Shovlin J. (2014). War and Peace: Trade, International Competition, and Political Economy, in Stern and Wennerlind (2014): 305-27.
  37. Stern P.J. and C. Wennerlind (eds.)(2014). Mercantilism Re-imagined: Political Economy in Early Modern Britain and its Empire, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  38. Swart K.W. (1967). The Miracle of the Dutch Republic as Seen in the Seventeenth Century. Inaugural lecture delivered at University College London, 6 November 1967, London, H.K. Lewis.
  39. Temple W. (1672). Remarques sur l’Etat des Provinces-Unies des Pays-Bas. Utrecht, n.p.
  40. Vaudichon G. de (1882). Montchrétien (1575-1621). I. L’homme. II. Le bandolier. III. Le poète. IV. L’économiste, Amines, Delattre-Lenoel.
  41. Wallerstein I. (1974). The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century , New York, NY, Academic Press.
  42. Wallerstein I. (1980). The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750, New York, Academic Press.
  43. Wilson C.H. (1965). England’s Apprenticeship, 1603-1763. London, Longmans.

Rosario Patalano, Nation-World: Autarky and Geo-economics in Montchrétien’s Traicté in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 2/2016, pp 85-98, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2016-002006