The violation of human rights and the exploitation of youth in developing countries

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Daniela Covino, Rosa Malgeri Manzo
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 20 P. 27-46 Dimensione file 195 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2017-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

About 75% of world trade is controlled by big companies. Being the main driver of globalization, these companies are able to influence the conditions of work and life of millions of people worldwide. However they are often guilty of having triggered negative dynamics in host countries. This work aims to highlight cases of violation of human rights, with particular reference to the exploitation of youth, by powerful companies in developing countries, because it is a subject of great social importance and timeless. The analysis conducted revealed that, despite the serious violations of which they are guilty, also from the environmental point of view, big companies are rarely called to answer for their acts remaining completely unpun-ished, thanks to their expanded and consolidated power.

Circa il 75% del commercio mondiale è controllato da grandi imprese. Essendo il principale motore della globalizzazione, queste imprese sono in grado di influenzare le condizioni di lavoro e di vita di milioni di persone in tutto il mondo. Tuttavia esse sono spesso colpevoli di aver innescato dinamiche negative nei paesi ospitanti. Questo lavoro si propone di mettere in evidenza casi di violazione dei diritti umani, con particolare riferimento allo sfruttamento dei giovani, da parte di potenti imprese nei paesi in via di sviluppo, essendo un argomento di grande importanza sociale e senza tempo. L’analisi svolta ha rivelato che, nonostante le gravi violazioni di cui sono colpevoli, anche dal punto di vista ambientale, le grandi imprese sono raramente chiamate a rispondere dei loro atti rimanendo completamente impunite, grazie al loro ampliato e consolidato potere.

Keywords:Globalizzazione, grandi imprese, impunità legale, generazione dei giovani, responsabilità sociale d’impresa, sostenibilità

  1. Addo M. (1999). Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  2. Ajai O. (2015). Corporate impact on the environment and the judicial development of the norm of corporate sustainability. Implication for the implementation of the Global Compact. Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice.
  3. Amao O. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, human rights and the law: Multinational corporations in developing countries. London: Routledge.
  4. Amnesty Internatinal Italia (2016). I marchi che usano olio di palma beneficiano del lavoro minorile e forzato [The brands that use palm oil benefit of child and forced labor]. --Available to: https://www.amnesty.it/marchi-usano-olio-palma-beneficiano-del-lavoro-minorile-forzato/, accessed December 2016.
  5. Antonucci A. (2007). La responsabilità sociale di impresa [The corporate social responsibility]. NGCC, 2: 119-129.
  6. Bachmann S.D., Pereira V. (2014). Corporate human rights responsibility and multinationality in emerging markets-a legal perspective for corporate governance and responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics.
  7. Banerjee S.B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. -- Available to: http://www.e-elqar.com/bookentrymain.lasso?id=12532, accessed April 2016.
  8. Barbier E.B. (2016). Sustainability and development. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 8(1): 261-280.
  9. Barnet R.J., Muller R.E. (1974). Global Reach: The Power of Multinational Corporations. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  10. Boccia F. (2015). Genetically Modified Organisms: What Issues in the Italian Market? Quality – Access to Success, 16(145): 105-110.
  11. Boccia F., Sarnacchiaro P. (2015). Genetically Modified Foods and Consumer Perspective. Recent Patents on Food, Nutrition & Agriculture, 7(1): 28-34.
  12. Boccia F. (2016). Consumer perception: an analysis on second generation genetically modified foods. Nutrition and Food Science, 46(5): 637-646.
  13. Boccia F., Covino D. (2016). Innovation and sustainability in agri-food companies: the role of quality. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 1: 131-141.
  14. Boeger N., Murray R., Villiers C. (2008). Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. -- Available to: http://www.e-elqar.com/bookentrymain.lasso?id=12896, accessed September 2016.
  15. Bonardi B. (2015). Nestlé accerta violazioni dei diritti umani tra i fornitori di frutti di mare che operano in Thailandia [Nestlé discovers violations of human rights among the suppliers of seafood in Thailand]. --Available to: http://www.ilfattoalimentare.it/diritti-umani-nestle-gamberi.html, accessed De-cember 2016.
  16. Cahill-Ripley A. (2014). Foregrounding socio-economic rights in transitional jus-tice: realising justice for violations of economic and social rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 32(2): 183-213.
  17. Coca-Cola. --Available to: http://www.coca-colacompany.com/our-company/human-rights-policy, accessed June 2016.
  18. Covino D. (2011). Un approccio sistemico alla dimensione ambientale dello sviluppo sostenibile [A systemic approach to environmental dimension of sustainable development]. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 1: 93-107.
  19. Covino D., Boccia F., Cesaretti G.P. (2013). Globalizzazione e regole per la sostenibilità del benessere [Globalization and rules for well-being sustainability]. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 1: 93-107.
  20. Covino D. (2016). GMOs and the issue of coexistence in Italy. Nutrition and Food Science, 46 (5): 659-671.
  21. Covino D., Boccia F. (2016). Potentialities of new agri-biotechnology for sustainable nutrition. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 2.
  22. Crawford G., Andreassen B.A. (2015). Human rights and development: Putting power and politics at the center. Human Rights Quarterly, 37 (3): 662-690.
  23. DeChaine D.R. (2011). Ethos in a bottle: Corporate social responsibility and humanitarian Doxa. The Megarthetorics of Global Development.
  24. De George R.T. (1998). Business Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  25. Di Nunno F. (2016). Giornata Internazionale dei Giovani 2016: verso la sostenibilità [International Youth Day 2016: towards sustainability]. --Available to: http://altrimondinews.it/2016/08/12/giornata-internazionale-giovani-sostenibilita/, accessed November 2016.
  26. Galgano F. (2005). La globalizzazione nello specchio del diritto [Globalization in the mirror right]. Bologna: il Mulino.
  27. Gill L. (2007). “Right there with you”: Coca-Cola, labor restructuring and political violance in Colombia. Critique of Anthropology, 27(3): 235-260.
  28. Giuliani E. (2014). Human Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries’ Industrial Clusters. Journal of Business Ethics.
  29. Greco P. (2007). Perché c’è bisogno di responsabilità sociale delle imprese, Introduzione a Lavoratori e impresa socialmente responsabile [Why do we need corporate social responsibility, Introduction to Workers and socially responsible business]. Torino, p. 1 e ss.
  30. Hunt L.W. (2014). The global Ethics of helping and harming. Human Rights Quarterly, 36(4): 798-819.
  31. ILO (2000). Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy. Ginevra. --Available to: http://www.ilo.org, accessed September 2016.
  32. ILO (2016). Eliminare la povertà con modelli di consumo e produzione sostenibili e attraverso il lavoro dignitoso per i giovani [Eradicating poverty through su-stainable consumption and production models and dignified work for young people]. --Available to: http://www.ilo.org/rome/risorse-informative/per-la-stampa/comunicati-stampa/WCMS_510111/lang--it/index.htm, accessed December 2016.
  33. Irwin E.G., Gopalakrishnan S., Randall A. (2016). Welfare, wealth and sustainability. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 8(1): 77-98.
  34. Jagers N.M. (2002). Corporate human rights obligations: in search of accountability. Intersentia.
  35. Joseph S. (2000). An overview of the Human Rights Accountability of Multinational Enterprises. Kluwer Law International.
  36. Kamminga M.T., Zia-Zarifi S. (2000). Liability of multinational corporations under international Law. Kluwer Law International.
  37. Kolk A. (2015). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business.
  38. Lambooy T. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: Sustainable water use. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(8): 852-866.
  39. Love J. (1986). McDonald’s: Behind the Golden Arches. New York: Bantam Books.
  40. Maclay K. (2013). Fast Food, Poverty Wages: The Public Cost of Low-wage jobs in the Fast Food Industry. University of California Labor Center.
  41. McDonald’s (2016). --Available to: http://www.mcdonalds.it/azienda/ambiente, accessed June 2016.
  42. Molteni M. (2004). Responsabilità sociale e performance d’impresa. Per una sintesi socio-competitiva [Social responsibility and corporate performance. For a summary of socio-competitive]. Milano.
  43. Morrone F. (2010). Lo sfruttamento della manodopera straniera e le “forme contemporanee di schiavitù”: il caso di Rosarno (Foreign workforce exploitation and contemporary forms of slavery: the Rosarno case). Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale, pp. 367-376.
  44. Nestlé (2016). --Available to: http://www.nestle.com/nutrition-health-wellness, accessed June 2016.
  45. OECD (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. --Available to: http://www.oecd.org, accessed September 2016.
  46. ONU (2012). Integrare i diritti umani alla tutela ambientale [Incorporate human rights to environmental protection]. --Available to: http://www.rinnovabili.it/ambiente/onu-%E2%80%9Cintegrare-i-diritti-umani-alla-tutela-ambientale%E2%80%9D60041/, accessed November 2016.
  47. Osuji O.K. (2015), Corporate social responsibility, juridification and globalisation: “Inventive interventionism for a paradox”. International Journal of Law in Context.
  48. Perulli A. (2011). Globalizzazione e dumping sociale: quali rimedi? [Globalization and social dumping: what remedies?]. Lav. dir., 1: 13 e ss.
  49. Pineschi L. (2006). La tutela internazionale dei diritti umani. Norme, garanzie, prassi. [The international protection of human rights. Rules, safeguards, practices. Milano: Giuffrè.
  50. Post J.E. (1985). Assessing the Nestlé Boycott: Corporate Accountability and Human Rights. California Management Review, 27(2): 113-131.
  51. Risse M. (2009). A Right to Work? A Right to Leisure? Labor Rights as Human Rights. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 3(1).
  52. Sarno V., Malgeri Manzo R. (2016). Italian companies’ attitude towards GM crops. Nutrition and Food Science, 46(5): 685-694.
  53. Shany Y. (2013). Taking Universality Seriously: A Functional Approach to Extra-territoriality in International Human Rights Law. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 7(1).
  54. Shutters S.T. (2016). Interdependent preferences and prospects for global sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practie, 12(3): 25-39.
  55. Surya D. (2003). Human Rights Violations by Multinational Corporations and International Law: Where from Here? Connectical Journal of International Law, 1.
  56. Taurisano V., Anzelmo G., Poli A., Nicolaus B., Di Donato P. (2014). Re-use of Agro-industrial Waste: Recovery of Valuable Compounds by Eco-friendly Techniques. International journal of performability engineering, 10: 419-425.
  57. UN (2003). Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights.--Available to: http://www.un.org, accessed September 2016.
  58. Unilever. --Available to: https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/, accessed June 2016.
  59. Unimondo (2006). Greenpeace: McDonald’s si mangia l’Amazzonia [Greenpeace: McDonald’s eats the Amazon]. --Available to: http://www.unimondo.org/Guide/Ambiente/Foreste-e-deforestazione/Greenpeace-McDonald-s-si-mangia-l-Amazzonia-86154, accessed November 2016.
  60. Weissbrodt D., Kruger M. (2003). Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights. American Journal of International Law.
  61. Weissbrodt D., Kruger M. (2004). The UN Human Rights norms for Business: Towards Legal Accountability. London: Amnesty International.
  62. Yamin A.E., Norheim O.F. (2014). Taking equality seriously: Applying human rights frameworks to priority setting in health. Human Rights Quarterly, 36(2): 296-324.
  63. Zeisel K. (2006). The Promotion of Human Rights by Selective Public Procurement. Hart Publishing.

Daniela Covino, Rosa Malgeri Manzo, The violation of human rights and the exploitation of youth in developing countries in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2017, pp 27-46, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2017-001004