Green practices in port authority management: A multiple case study

Author/s Marcello Risitano, Francesco Parola, Alessandra Turi, Marco Ferretti
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/3
Language English Pages 19 P. 127-145 File size 118 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2017-003008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Port management is one of the most important economic pillars in maritime countries, where business players - such as port authorities, shippers, carriers, terminals, etc. - are called to undertake a virtuous process of economic development, respectful of the environment. This means achieving a sustainable growth, supported by green actions for environmental protection to improve corporate social responsibility. Coherently, the authors analyzed the role of Port Authorities (PAs) in adopting a socially responsible behavior, taking into consideration economic, environmental and societal expectations of all stakeholders in port logistics and management. For this purpose, in this work was adopted a multiple case study analysis to comparatively evaluate the green practices of PA enabling a sustainable growth, trying to explain: a. if there is a single or multiple stakeholders involvement in PA’s green strategies; b. what are the key green practices in port management; c. if there is a proactive or reactive approach to define green practices. In the empirical research were selected four representative PAs with a strong attitude towards green practices - Hong Kong (Asia), Antwerp (Northern Europe), Barcelona (Southern Europe) and Los Angeles (USA) - located in different geographical areas.

Keywords: Port management, corporate social responsibility, green practices, port authority, stakeholder involvement, case study.

  1. Acciaro M., Ghiara H., Cusano M.I. (2014). Energy Management in Seaports: A New Role for Port Authorities. Energy Policy, 71: 4-12.
  2. Acciaro M. (2015). Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(3). 291-311.
  3. Adams M., Quinonez P., Pallis A.A., Wakeman T. (2009). Environmental issues in port competitiveness. Dalhousie University.
  4. Aguinis H., Glavas A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4): 932-968.
  5. Anderson H., Huge Brodin M. (2005). The consumer’s changing role: The case of recycling. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 16(1): 77-86.
  6. Baumgartner R.J. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable Development, 17(2): 102-113.
  7. Baumgartner R.J. (2014). Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5): 258-271.
  8. Brønn P.S., Vrioni A.B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2): 207-222.
  9. Burke L., Logsdon J.M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4): 495-502.
  10. Cahoon S. (2007). Marketing communications for seaports: a matter of survival and growth. Maritime Policy & Management, 34(2): 151-168.
  11. Carpenter G., White P. (2004). Sustainable development: finding the real business case. Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business, 11(2): 2-51.
  12. Carroll A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3): 268-295.
  13. Carter C.R., Rogers D.S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5): 360-387.
  14. Chang C.C., Wang C.M. (2012). Evaluating the effects of green port policy: case study of Kaohsiung harbor in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(3): 185-189.
  15. Chlomoudis C.I., Pallis A.A. (2002). European Union Port Policy. Books.
  16. Darbra R.M., Ronza A., Stojanovic T.A., Wooldridge C., Casal J. (2005). A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50(8): 866-874.
  17. Denktas-Sakar G., Karatas-Cetin C. (2012). Port sustainability and stakeholder management in supply chains: A framework on resource dependence theory. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 28(3): 301-319.
  18. Dentchev N.A. (2004). Corporate social performance as a business strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4). 395-410.
  19. Dooms M., Verbeke A. (2007). Stakeholder management in ports: a conceptual framework integrating insights from research in strategy, corporate social responsibility and port management. In: IAME 2007 Annual Conference 2007.
  20. Elkington J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century.
  21. ESPO. 2012. Green Guide: Towards Excellence in Port Environmental Management and Sustainability. Brussels: European Seaport Organisation (ESPO).
  22. Etzion D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4): 637-664.
  23. Fairbrass J. (2006). UK Businesses and CSR Policy: Shaping the Debate in the EU. University of Bradford, School of Management.
  24. Grewal D., Darlow N.J. (2007). The business paradigm for corporate social reporting in the context of Australian seaports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 9(2): 172-192.
  25. Hall P.V., O’Brien T., Woudsma C. (2013). Environmental innovation and the role of stakeholder collaboration in West Coast port gateways. Research in Transportation Economics, 42(1): 87-96.
  26. Hammond S.A., Slocum Jr J.W. (1996). The impact of prior firm financial performance on subsequent corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2): 159-165.
  27. Jones T.M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3): 59-67.
  28. Kärnä J., Hansen E., Juslin H. (2003). Social responsibility in environmental marketing planning. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5/6): 848-871.
  29. Lam J.S.L., Van de Voorde E. (2012). Green port strategy for sustainable growth and development. In: Transport Logistics for Sustainable Growth at a New Level, International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA) (pp. 27-30).
  30. Lankoski L. (2008). Corporate responsibility activities and economic performance: a theory of why and how they are connected. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8): 536-547.
  31. Meersman H., Van de Voorde E. (2002). Port management, operation and competition: a focus on North-Europe. The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business. London: LLP, pp. 765-781.
  32. Murray K.B., Vogel C.M. (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2): 141-159.
  33. Ng A.K., Song S. (2010). The environmental impacts of pollutants generated by routine shipping operations on ports. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53(5): 301-311.
  34. Notteboom T., Winkelmans W. (2002). Stakeholder Relations Management in ports: dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing competitive environment. In: IAME Panama 2002 Conference Proceedings.
  35. O’riordan L., Fairbrass J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4): 745-758.
  36. Polonsky M.J. (1994). An introduction to green marketing. Electronic Green Journal, 1(2).
  37. Porter M.E., Van Der Linde C. (1995). Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5): 120-134.
  38. Porte M.E., Kramer M.R. (2007). The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 85: 136-137.
  39. Schulten U. (1991). Marketing from the customer’s point of view. Port Management Textbook, 3: 15-32.
  40. Tata J., Prasad S. (2015). CSR Communication: An Impression Management Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(4): 765-778.
  41. Ulrich H. (2001). Systemorientiertes Management: das Werk von Hans Ulrich. Haupt, p. 599.
  42. Verhoeven P. (2010). A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3): 247-270.
  43. Wagner M. (2011). Corporate performance implications of extended stakeholder management: New insights on mediation and moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 70(5): 942-950.
  44. Walton C.C. (1967). Corporate social responsibilities. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  45. Yin R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Evaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidence from Italy Rosalia Castellano, Marco Ferretti, Gaetano Musella, Marcello Risitano, in Journal of Cleaner Production 122560/2020 pp.122560
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122560

Marcello Risitano, Francesco Parola, Alessandra Turi, Marco Ferretti, Green practices in port authority management: A multiple case study in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 3/2017, pp 127-145, DOI: 10.3280/MC2017-003008