Perchè la leadership generativa. Il contributo delle neuroscienze

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Michela Balconi, Giulia Fronda, Maria Rosaria Natale, Enrico Rimoldi
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 19 P. 365-383 Dimensione file 220 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2017-003007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Negli ultimi anni, l’interesse della psicologia del management e delle organizzazioni è stato volto ad indagare l’attitudine generativa all’interno delle organizzazioni, osservando il modo in cui le aziende promuovono relazioni di tipo generativo caratterizzate da un’apertura al confronto con gli altri attraverso lo svolgimento di azioni condivise per il raggiungimento di obiettivi comuni. In quest’ottica, il recente funzionamento organizzativo delle aziende abbandona la classica visione dell’organizzazione come deterministica, caratterizzata da una relazione lineare tra le variabili e da risultati aziendali standardizzabili, e richiede la presenza di un modello di leadership innovativo, in cui il ruolo organizzativo non è ricoperto da una persona che esercita la propria autorità sugli altri, imponendo la propria visione individuale. Il nuovo modello di leadership, infatti, a differenza delle teorie classiche sulla figura del leader, promuove e facilita l’evoluzione di comportamenti d’interazione attraverso la creazione di condizioni per l’autorganizzazione degli individui e la generazione di contesti che favoriscano interconnessioni e scambi reciproci. La nuova figura del leader "generativo" valorizza ogni componente del proprio team di lavoro attraverso un focus sul "care", migliorando l’efficacia relazionale e promuovendo l’autonomia decisionale dei propri collaboratori. Alla luce di questa nuova prospettiva all’interno dei contesti aziendali, l’interesse delle neuroscienze si è focalizzato sullo studio delle componenti che possono favorire una condizione di benessere all’interno dei contesti aziendali, concentrandosi sulle capacità di leadership e sulle dinamiche relazionali.;

Keywords:Lleadership generativa, sistemi organizzativi generativi, neuro-scienze sociali, neuroleadership, autonomia decisionale, interdipendenza.

  1. Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693-716.
  2. Amietta, P.L., Fabbri, D., Munari, A., & Trupia, P. (2011). I destini cresciuti. Quattro percorsi nell’apprendere adulto. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Anderson, R.C. (1999). Mid-Course correction: toward a sustainable enterprise: the interface model. Atlanta: Peregrinzilla Press.
  4. Ashkanasy, N.M., & Daus, C.S. (2002). Emotion in the workplace: The new challenge for managers. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 76-86. DOI: 10.5465/AME.2002.6640191
  5. Assadi, S.M., Yucel, M., & Pantelis, C. (2009). Dopamine modulates neural net-works involved in effort-based decision making. Neuroscience and Biobehav-ioral Reviews, 33(3), 383-393.
  6. Avital, M., & Te’eni, D. (2009). From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal, 19(4), 345-367.
  7. Balconi, M. (Ed.) (2010). Neuropsychology of the Sense of Agency. From Consciousness to Action. Milano: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-1587-6
  8. Balconi, M. (2011). Neuropsychology of the sense of agency: theoretical and empirical contributions. Brain Research Journal, 3(1), 17-36.
  9. Barsade, S.G., & Gibson, D.E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 36-59. DOI: 10.5465/AMP.2007.24286163
  10. Bechara, A. (2004). Disturbances of emotion regulation after focal brain lesions. International Review of Neurobiology, 62, 159-193. DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7742(04)62006-X
  11. Berg, B.L., & Lune, H. (2011). Quantitative research methods for the social sciences. New York: Pearson Education.
  12. Bethany, J.W., & Scott, A.H. (2008). The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision-making. Brain Research, 1234, 104-115.
  13. Beugré, C.D. (2010). Brain and human behavior in organizations: A field of neuro- organizational behavior. In A.A. Stanton, M. Day, & I.M. Welpe (Eds.), Neuroeconomics and the firm. (pp. 289-303). Cheltenham: Elgar.
  14. Blair, K., Marsh, A.A., Morton, J., Vythilingam, M., Jones, M., Mondillo, K., Pine, D.C., Drevets, W.C., & Blair J.R. (2007). Choosing the lesser of two evils, the better of two goods: Specifying the roles of ventromedial prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate in object choice. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(44), 11379-11386. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1640-06.2006
  15. Bradley, C.L. (1997). Generativity-stagnation: Development of a status model. Developmental Review, 17(3), 262–290.
  16. Camerer, C.F., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2004). Neuroeconomics: Why economics needs brains. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 555-579.
  17. Carter, R.M., Bowling, D.L., Reeck, C., & Huettel, S.A. (2012). A distinct role of the temporal-parietal junction in predicting socially guided decisions. Science, 337(6090), 109-111.
  18. Castro, F., Gomes, J., & de Sousa, F.C. (2012). Do intelligent leaders make a difference? Effect of a leader’s emotional intelligence on follower’s creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 171-182.
  19. Chi, N.W., Huang, Y.M., & Lin, S.C. (2009). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: the moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group & Organization Management, 34(6), 698-726. DOI: 10.1177/1059601109350985
  20. Kringelbach, M.L. (2005). The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(9), 691-702.
  21. Crivelli, D., & Balconi, M. (2010). Agency and inter-agency, action and joint action: theoretical and neuropsychological evidences. In M. Balconi (Ed.), Neuropsychology of the Sense of Agency. From Consciousness to Action (pp. 107-122). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  22. Crivelli, D., & Balconi, M. (in press). Agentività e competenze sociali: riflessioni teoriche e implicazioni per il management. Ricerche di Psicologia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  23. Davila, T., Epstein, M.J., & Shelton, R. (2006). Making innovation work: how to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing.
  24. Daw, N.D., O’Doherty, J.P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R.J. (2006). Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature, 441(7095), 876-879.
  25. Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., Nagode, J.C., Rustichini, A., Smith, K., & Pardo, J.V. (2003). The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(6), 3536-3541.
  26. Dilts, R. (1998). Leadership e visione creativa. Milano: Guerini e Associati.
  27. Elger, C.E. (2009). Neuroleadership. Freiburg: Haufe.
  28. Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  29. Friedrich, T.L., Mumford, M.D., Vessey, B., Beeler, C.K. & Eubanks, D. (2010). Leading for innovation. International Studies of Management and Organization, 40(2), 6-29. DOI: 10.2753/IMO0020-8825400201
  30. Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14-21.
  31. Gergen, K.J. (1978). Experimentation in social psychology: A reappraisal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(4), 507-527.
  32. Giaccardi, C., & Magatti, M. (2014). Generativi di tutto il mondo, unitevi! Manifesto per la società dei liberi. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  33. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2001). Primal leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  34. Gordon, E., Barnett, K.J., Cooper, N.J., Tran, N., & Williams, L.M. (2008). An ‘Integrative Neuroscience’ platform: applications to profiles of negativity and positivity bias. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 7(3), 345-366. DOI: 10.1142/S0219635208001927
  35. Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B., Nystrom, L.E., Darley, J.M., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108.
  36. Haefner, R.M., Gerwinn, S., Macke, J.H., & Bethge, M. (2013). Inferring decoding strategies from choice probabilities in the presence of correlated variability. Nature Neuroscience, 16(2), 235-242.
  37. Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Meuli, R., & Honey, C.J. (2008). Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLOS Biology, 6(7), 1-15.
  38. Haines, S. (2009). Bankrupt leadership development? Training, 46(5), 64.
  39. Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628
  40. Hanslmayer, S., Sauseng, P., Doppelmayr, M., Schabus, M. & Klimesch, W. (2005). Increasing individual upper alpha by neurofeedback improves cognitive performance in human subjects. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeed-back 30(1), 1-10.
  41. Hansson, M. (2006). Att vara sin egen chef - om oreglerat och självorganiserat arbete. In C. von Otter (Ed.), Ledarskap för fria medarbetare (pp. 1-22). Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.
  42. Heisel, A.D., & Beatty, M.J. (2006). Are cognitive representations of friends’ request refusals implemented in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices? A cognitive neuroscience approach to ‘theory of mind’ in relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(2), 249-265. DOI: 10.1177/0265407506062476
  43. Henson, R. (2006). Forward inference using functional neuroimaging: dissociations versus associations. Trends in Cogitive Sciences, 10(2), 64-69.
  44. Hines, T. (1987). Left brain/right brain mythology and implications for management and training. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 600-606. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306708
  45. House, R.J., & Aditya, R. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-474. DOI: 10.1177/014920639702300306
  46. House, R.J., & Howell, J.M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 81-108. DOI: 10.1016/1048-9843(92)90028-E
  47. Howell, J.M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: relationships and their consequences. Academy of Manage-ment Review, 30(1), 96–112. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281435
  48. Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Camerer, C.F. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310(5754), 1680-1683.
  49. Huettel, S.A., Song, A.W., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Decisions under uncertainty: Probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(13), 3304-3311. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5070-04.2005
  50. Huettel, S.A., Stowe, C.J., Gordon, E.M., Warner, B.T., & Platt, M.L. (2006). Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron, 49(5), 765-775.
  51. Humphrey, R.H. (2002). The many faces of emotional leadership. The Leadership quarterly, 13(5), 493-504.
  52. Jasper, H.H. (1958). Recent advances in our understanding of ascending activities of the reticular system. In H.H. Jasper, L.D. Proctor, R.K. Knighton, W.C. Noshay & R.T. Costello (Eds.), Reticular formation of the brain (pp. 319-331). Boston: Little Brown.
  53. Jasper, L.D., Proctor, R.S., Knighton, W.C., Noshay, & Costello, R.T. (Eds), Reticular formation of the brain (pp. 319-332). Boston: Little, Brown and Co. Quarterly, 13(5), 493-504. DOI: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00140-6
  54. Jaworski, J. (1996). Synchronicity: The Inner Path of Leadership. San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler.
  55. Johnson, M.K., Baxter, L.C., Wilder, L.S., Pipe, J.G., Heiserman, J.E., & Prigatano, G.P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125(8), 1808-1814.
  56. Jones, A. (2008). The innovation acid test. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
  57. Judge, T.A., & Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leader-ship: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
  58. Kellerman, B. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  59. Kessler, E.M., & Staudinger, U.M. (2007). Intergenerational potential: Effects of social interaction between older adults and adolescents. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 690-704. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.690
  60. Knabb, J.J., Welsh, R.K., Ziebell, J.G., & Reimer, K.S. (2009). Neuroscience, moral reasoning, and the law. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(2), 219-236.
  61. Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore: John Hopkins.
  62. Kuhnen, C.M., & Knutson, B. (2005). The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron, 47(5), 763-770.
  63. Kunnanatt, J.T. (2008). Emotional intelligence: theory and description: A competency model for interpersonal effectiveness. Career Development International, 13(7), 614-629. DOI: 10.1108/13620430810911083
  64. Lambrechts, F., Martens, H., & Grieten, S. (2008). Building high quality relationships during organizational change: transcending differences in a generative learning process. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 8(3), 93-102.
  65. Le Doux, J.E. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 209-235.
  66. Lee, Y., & Nelson, D.W. (2005). Viewing or visualizing which concept map strategy works best on problem-solving performance? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 193-203.
  67. Lee, N., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). Neuroimaging and psychophysiological measurement in organizational research: An agenda for research in organizational cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 18-42.
  68. Lewicki, R.J., McAllister, D.J., & Bies, R.J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-458.
  69. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R.K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269-299. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1939.9713366
  70. Lieberman, M.D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 259-289.
  71. Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 740-765. DOI: 10.1177/0002764203260208
  72. McAdams, P.D., & de St. Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003-1005. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003
  73. McAdams, D.P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R.L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221-230. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221
  74. McGregor, J. (2007) The business brain in close-up: can neuroscience offer insights into the ‘soft’ art of leadership? BusinessWeek, 4043, 68-69.
  75. Mor-Barak, M.E. (1995). The meaning of work for older adults seeking employment: The generativity factor. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(4), 325-344.
  76. Mumford, R.V., Van Iddekinge, C.H., Morgeson, F.P., & Campion, M.A. (2008). The team role test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 250-267.
 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.250
  77. Naqvi, N., Shiv, B., & Bechara, A. (2006). The role of emotion in decision making: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 260-264.
  78. Naranjo-Gil, D., Maas, V., & Hartmann, G.H. (2009). How CFOs determine management accounting innovation: An examination of direct and indirect effects. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 667-695. DOI: 10.1080/09638180802627795
  79. Ochsner, K.N., & Lieberman, M.D. (2001). The emergence of social cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 56(9), 717-734. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.9.717
  80. O’Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M.L., Rolls, E.T., Hornak, J., & Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 95-102. DOI: 10.1038/82959
  81. Olsson, A., & Ochsner, K.N. (2008). The role of social cognition in emotion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(2), 65-71.
  82. Olson, I.R., McCoy, D., Klobusicky, E., & Ross, L.A. (2013). Social cognition and the anterior temporal lobes: A review and theoretical framework. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(2), 123-133.
  83. Paulus, M.P., Rogalsky, C., Simmons, A., Feinstein, J.S., & Stein, M.B. (2003). Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism. NeuroImage, 19(4), 1439-1448. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00251-9
  84. Peterson, B.E., & Klohnen, E.C. (1995). Realization of generativity in two samples of women at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 20-29. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.20
  85. Peterson, B.E, & Stewart, A.J. (1996). Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychology and Aging, 11(3), 21-33. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.21
  86. Peterson, B.E., & Duncan, L.E. (2007). Midlife women’s generativity and authoritarianism: Marriage, motherhood, and 10 years of aging. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 411-419. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.411
  87. Phelps, E.A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 27-53.
  88. Riggio, R.E., & Reichard, R.J. (2008). The emotional and social intelligences of effective leadership: An emotional and social skill approach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(2), 169-185. DOI: 10.1108/02683940810850808
  89. Rock, D. (2009). Your brain at work: strategies for overcoming distraction, regaining focus, and working smarter all day long. New York: HarperCollins.
  90. Rock, D., & Schwartz, J. (2006). The neuroscience of leadership. Strategy and Business, 43, 70-79.
  91. Rock, D., & Schwartz, J. (2007). The Neuroscience of Leadership. Reclaiming Children & Youth, 16(3), 10-17.
  92. Rogers, R.D., Owen, A.M., Middleton, H.C., Williams, E.J., Pickard, J.D., Sahakian, B.J., & Robbins, T. W. (1999). Choosing between small, likely rewards and large, unlikely rewards activates inferior and orbital prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(20), 9029–9038.
  93. Rorty, R. (1996). Obiectivity, relativism and Truth. Cambrige University Press.
  94. Salloway, S.P., Malloy, P.F., & Duffy, J.D. (2001). The frontal lobes and neuropsychiatric illnesses. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  95. Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J.K., Aronson, J.A., Nystrom, L.E., & Cohen, J.D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758.
  96. Simoncini, D., & De Simone, M. (2008). Il Mago e il Matto. Sapere personale e conoscenza relazionale nella rete organizzativa. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  97. Simoncini, D., & De Simone, M. (2010a). Lo “Stato dell’Arte” degli Studi Organizzativi e Manageriali: Allargare lo Sguardo attraverso i Critical Management Studies. Sviluppo e Organizzazione, 240, 18-25.
  98. Singer, A.C., Carr, M. F., Karlsson, M.P., & Frank, L.M. (2013). Hippocampal SWR Activity Predicts Correct Decisions during the Initial Learning of an Alternation Task. Neuron, 77(6), 1163-1173.
  99. Sonnentag, S., & Volmer, J. (2009). Individual-level predictors of task-related teamwork pro- cesses: The role of expertise and self-efficacy in team meetings. Group & Organization Management, 34(1), 37-66. DOI: 10.1177/1059601108329377
  100. Steinbock, A.J. (1995). Generativity and generative phenomenology. Husserl Studies, 12(1), 57-79.
 DOI: 10.1007/BF01324160
  101. Steinbock, A.J. (2003). Generativity and the Scope of Generative Phenomenology. In D. Welton (Eds.), The New Husserl: A Critical Reader (Volume 1, pp. 287-324). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  102. Thompson, E. (2010) Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  103. Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Hermann, S., Happè, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shan, N.J., Fink, G.R., & Zilles, K. (2001). Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage, 14(1), 170-81.
  104. Wittrock, M.C. (1991). Generative teaching of comprehension. Elementary School Journal, 92(2), 167-182. DOI: 10.1086/461686
  105. Wittrock, M.C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27(4), 531-541.
  106. Wout, M.V., Kahn, R.S., Sanfey, A.G., & Aleman, A. (2005). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects strategic decision- making. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 16(16), 1849-1852.

  • Face-to-face vs. remote digital settings in job assessment interviews: A multilevel hyperscanning protocol for the investigation of interpersonal attunement Michela Balconi, Giulia Fronda, Federico Cassioli, Davide Crivelli, Humaira Nisar, in PLOS ONE /2022 pp.e0263668
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263668
  • Drawing the business management perspective of the Disruptive Based on brain coaching skills and design thinking Ehsan chitsaz, marziyeh bakhtiari, in Quarterly Journal of Skill Training /2023 pp.157
    DOI: 10.61186/irtvto.11.43.157

Michela Balconi, Giulia Fronda, Maria Rosaria Natale, Enrico Rimoldi, Perchè la leadership generativa. Il contributo delle neuroscienze in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 3/2017, pp 365-383, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2017-003007