Empatia e Teoria della Mente: una review narrativa su differenze e convergenze concettuali alla luce delle recenti scoperte neurobiologiche

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Letizia Bartolomeo, Luca Cerniglia, Micaela Capobianco
Anno di pubblicazione 2018 Fascicolo 2018/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 36 P. 19-54 Dimensione file 382 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2018-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Sebbene sia l’empatia che la teoria della mente permettano agli esseri umani di comprendere gli altri attraverso la rappresentazione dei loro stati mentali o dei loro stati emotivi, le ricerche nel campo delle neuroscienze hanno evidenziato che le capacità di mentalizzare e di empatizzare sono associate all’attivazione di cir-cuiti neuro-cognitivi diversi. D’altra parte, studi recenti, basati su paradigmi natu-ralistici, hanno mostrato che i sistemi neurali coinvolti nelle esperienze di condi-visione e di mentalizzazione, svolgono un ruolo complementare durante le intera-zioni sociali complesse. La presente rassegna narrativa ha l’obiettivo di discutere alcune delle caratteristiche di distinzione e sovrapposizione nei costrutti di empa-tia e teoria della mente, sia dal punto di vista psicologico che neurobiologico. La conoscenza dello stato dell’arte in questa tematica, può sostenere e indirizzare la programmazione di interventi clinici specifici basati prevalentemente sul rafforzamento delle capacità empatiche o di teoria della mente.;

Keywords:Teoria della mente, empatia, mentalizzazione, correlati neurali, interazioni sociali.

  1. Papez, J.W. (1937). A proposed mechanism of emotion. Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 38(4), 725-743.
  2. Allman, J.M., Tetreault, N.A., Hakeem, A.Y., Manaye, K.F., Semendeferi, K., Erwin, J. M., & Hof, P.R. (2011). The von Economo neurons in the frontoinsular and anterior cingulate cortex. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1225(1), 59-71.
  3. Allport, G.W. (1937). The personalistic psychology of William Stern. Journal of Personality, 5(3), 231-246.
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind, 1995. Cambridge, The, 230.
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Zero degrees of empathy: A new theory of human cruelty (Vol. 30). Penguin UK.
  6. Bartz, J.A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N. & Ochsner, K.N. (2011). Social effects of oxytocin in humans: context and person matter. Trends in cognitive sciences., 15, 301-309.
  7. Batson, C.D., Batson, J.G., Slingsby, J.K., Harrell, K.L., Peekna, H.M., & Todd, R.M. (1991). Empathic joy and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(3), 413. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.413
  8. Bhatt, M.A., Lohrenz, T., Camerer, C.F., & Montague, P.R. (2010). Neural signatures of strategic types in a two-person bargaining game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(46), 19720-19725.
  9. Bischof-Kohler, D. (1991). The development of empathy in infants. In M.E. Lamb & H. Keller (Eds.), Infant development: Perspectives from German-speaking countries (pp. 245-273). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  10. Blair, J., Sellars, C., Strickland, I., Clark, F., Williams, A., Smith, M., & Jones, L. (1996). Theory of mind in the psychopath. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 7(1), 15-25. DOI: 10.1080/09585189608409914
  11. Blair, R.J.R. (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and cognition, 14(4), 698-718.
  12. Bodden, M.E., Kubler, D., Knake, S., Menzler, K., Heverhagen, J.T., Sommer, J., & Dodel, R. (2013). Comparing the neural correlates of affective and cognitive theory of mind using fMRI: Involvement of the basal ganglia in affective theory of mind. Advances in cognitive psychology, 9(1), 32.
  13. Bonino, S. (2006). Contagio, empatia e comportamento prosociale. Il Comportamento Prosociale. Aspetti Individuali, Familiari e Sociali, 23-44.
  14. Botterill, G. (1996). Folk psychology and theoretical status. Theories of theories of mind, 105-118.
  15. Bruner, J., & Feldman, C. (1993). Theories of mind and the problem of autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from children with autism (pp. 267–291). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291701214111
  16. Buades-Rotger, M., Beyer, F., & Kramer, U. M. (2017). Avoidant responses to interpersonal provocation are associated with increased amygdala and decreased mentalizing network activity. eNeuro, 4(3), ENEURO-0337. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0337-16.2017
  17. Cerniglia, L., Cimino, S., Ballarotto, G., Casini, E., Ferrari, A., Carbone, P., & Cersosimo, M. (2015). Motor vehicle accidents and adolescents: an empirical study on their emotional and behavioral profiles, defense strategies and parental support. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 35, 28-36.
  18. Cimino, S., Cerniglia, L., Porreca, A., Simonelli, A., Ronconi, L., & Ballarotto, G. (2016). Mothers and fathers with binge eating disorder and their 18–36 months old children: a longitudinal study on parent–infant interactions and offspring’s emotional–behavioral profiles. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 580.
  19. Capobianco, M., Pizzuto, E.A., & Devescovi, A. (2017). Gesture-speech combinations and early verbal abilities. New longitudinal data during the second year of age. Interaction Studies, 18(1), 54-75.
  20. Capobianco, M., & Cerniglia, L. (2017). Early language development in preterm children without neurological damage: a longitudinal study. F1000Research, 6, 2169.
  21. Castelli, F., Happé, F., Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. Neuroimage, 12(3), 314-325.
  22. Catmur, C. (2015). Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems. Consciousness and cognition, 36, 426-433.
  23. Courchesne, E. & Pierce, K. Why the frontal cortex in autism might be talking only to itself: local over-connectivity but long-distance disconnection. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 225–230 (2005).
  24. Davis, M.H. (1980). Interpersonal reactivity index. Edwin Mellen Press.
  25. Decety, J., & Jackson, P.L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews, 3(2), 71-100. DOI: 10.1177/1534582304267187
  26. Dymond, R.F. (1949). A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13(2), 127.
  27. Dvash, J., & Shamay-Tsoory, S.G. (2014). Theory of mind and empathy as multidimensional constructs: Neurological foundations. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 282-295. DOI: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000040
  28. Dziobek, I., Fleck, S., Kalbe, E., Rogers, K., Hassenstab, J., Brand, M., .& Convit, A. (2006). Introducing MASC: a movie for the assessment of social cognition. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 36(5), 623-636.
  29. Ebstein, R.P., Israel, S., Chew, S.H., Zhong, S. & Knafo, A. (2010). Genetics of human social behavior. Neuron 65, 831-844.
  30. Egger, M, Smith, G.D., & Altman, D.G. (2001). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group.
  31. Eres, R., Decety, J., Louis, W.R., & Molenberghs, P. (2015). Individual differences in local gray matter density are associated with differences in affective and cognitive empathy. Neuroimage, 117, 305-10.
  32. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., & Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Current opinion in neurobiology, 15(2), 213-218.
  33. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of neurophysiology, 73(6), 2608-2611.
  34. Feshbach, N.D. (1983). Learning to care: A positive approach to child training and discipline. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 12(3), 266-271. DOI: 10.1080/15374418309533142
  35. Fletcher, P. C., Happe, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57(2), 109-128. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-R
  36. Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1996). Playing with reality: I. Theory of mind and the normal development of psychic reality. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 217-233.
  37. Freud, S. (1899). Ricordi di copertura (1899). Freud opere 1892,2.
  38. Gallagher, H.L., & Frith, C.D. (2003). Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(2), 77-83. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00025-6
  39. Gallagher, H.L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 11-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00053-6
  40. Gallese, V. (2001). The 'shared manifold' hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(5-7), 5-7.
  41. Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36(4), 171-180. DOI: 10.1159/000072786
  42. Gallese, V. (2003a). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 517-528.
  43. Gallese, V. (2005a). "Being Like Me": Self-Other Identity, Mirror Neurons, and Empathy. Perspectives on imitation: mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals, 1, 101.
  44. Gallese, V. (2005b). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, 4(1), 23-48.
  45. Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism. Brain research, 1079(1), 15-24.
  46. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2(12), 493-501. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5
  47. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593-609.
  48. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(9), 396-403.
  49. Goldman, A.I. (1992). In defense of the simulation theory. Mind & Language, 7(1‐2), 104-119.
  50. Gopnik, A. (1996). Theories and modules; creation myths, developmental realities, and Neurath's boat. Theories of theories of mind, 169.
  51. Harris, P. (1996). Desires, beliefs, and language. Theories of theories of mind, 200.
  52. Hoffman, M.L. (1987). The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 47-80). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  53. Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 33(3), 307.
  54. Holmgren, R.A., Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R.A. (1998). The relations of children's situational empathy related emotions to dispositional prosocial behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22(1), 169-193.
  55. Ickes, W.J. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. Guilford Press.
  56. Ingvar, M. (1999). Pain and functional imaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 354(1387), 1347-1358.
  57. Isoda, M. (2016). Understanding intentional actions from observers’ viewpoints: A social neuroscience perspective. Neuroscience research, 112, 1-9.
  58. Jackson, P.L., Meltzoff, A.N., & Decety, J. (2005). How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage, 24(3), 771-779.
  59. Jacquet, P.O., Roy, A.C., Chambon, V., Borghi, A.M., Salemme, R., Farnè, A., & Reilly, K.T. (2016). Changing ideas about others’ intentions: updating prior expectations tunes activity in the human motor system. Scientific reports, 6.
  60. Kalbe, E., Schlegel, M., Sack, A. T., Nowak, D. A., Dafotakis, M., Bangard, C., . & Kessler, J. (2010). Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: a TMS study. Cortex, 46(6), 769-780.
  61. Kanske, P., Bockler, A., Trautwein, F.M., Parianen Lesemann, F.H., & Singer, T. (2016). Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 11(9), 1383-1392.
  62. Kanske, P., Bockler, A., Trautwein, F. M., & Singer, T. (2015). Dissecting the social brain: Introducing the EmpaToM to reveal distinct neural networks and brain–behavior relations for empathy and Theory of Mind. Neuroimage, 122, 6-19.
  63. Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J.L., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2004). A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron, 42(2), 335-346. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00156-4
  64. Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? University of Chicago Press.
  65. Lockwood, P.L., Bird, G., Bridge, M., & Viding, E. (2013). Dissecting empathy: high levels of psychopathic and autistic traits are characterized by difficulties in different social information processing domains. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 760.
  66. Lombardo, M.V., Chakrabarti, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). What neuroimaging and perceptions of self-other similarity can tell us about the mechanism underlying mentalizing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(02), 152-153. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X09000715
  67. MacLean, P.D. (1949). Psychosomatic disease and the" visceral brain": Recent developments bearing on the Papez theory of emotion. Psychosomatic medicine, 11(6), 338-353. DOI: 10.1097/00006842-194911000-00003
  68. Mead, G. H., & Mind, H. (1934). Self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  69. Mehrabian, A. (1997). Relations among personality scales of aggression, violence, and empathy: Validational evidence bearing on the risk of eruptive violence scale. Aggressive Behavior, 23(6), 433-445.
  70. Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy1.Journal of personality, 40(4), 525-543.
  71. Novembre, G., Zanon, M., & Silani, G. (2014). Empathy for social exclusion involves the sensory-discriminative component of pain: a within-subject fMRI study. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 10(2), 153-164.
  72. Osaka, N., Osaka, M., Morishita, M., Kondo, H., & Fukuyama, H. (2004). A word expressing affective pain activates the anterior cingulate cortex in the human brain: an fMRI study. Behavioural Brain Research, 153(1), 123-127.
  73. Pizzuto, E.A., & Capobianco, M. (2008). Is pointing “just” pointing? Unraveling the complexity of indexes in spoken and signed discourse. Gesture, 8(1), 82-103.
  74. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 1(04), 515-526. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
  75. Preston, S.D., & De Waal, F. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and brain sciences, 25(01), 1-20. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018
  76. Rainville, P. (2002). Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation.Current opinion in neurobiology, 12(2), 195-204. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00313-6
  77. Reniers, R.L., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N.M., & Völlm, B.A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of personality assessment, 93(1), 84-95. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
  78. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive brain research, 3(2), 131-141.
  79. Rogers, C. R. (1959). Significant learning in therapy and in education. Educational leadership, 16(1959), 232-242. DOI: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  80. Schnell, K., Bluschke, S., Konradt, B., & Walter, H. (2011). Functional relations of empathy and mentalizing: an fMRI study on the neural basis of cognitive
  81. Sebastian, C.L., Fontaine, N.M., Bird, G., Blakemore, S.J., De Brito, S.A., McCrory, E.J., & Viding, E. (2011). Neural processing associated with cognitive and affective Theory of Mind in adolescents and adults. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, nsr023.
  82. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: a lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3054-3067.
  83. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617-627.
  84. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Harari, H., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Levkovitz, Y. (2010). The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies. Cortex, 46(5), 668-677.
  85. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Tibi-Elhanany, Y., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2006). The ventromedial prefrontal cortex is involved in understanding affective but not cognitive theory of mind stories. Social neuroscience, 1(3-4), 149-166. DOI: 10.1080/17470910600985589
  86. Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Tomer, R., Berger, B.D., Goldsher, D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18(1), 55-67.
  87. Singer, T., & Fehr, E. (2005). The neuroeconomics of mind reading and empathy. American Economic Review, 95(2), 340-345. DOI: 10.1257/000282805774670103
  88. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R.J., & Frith, C.D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157-1162.
  89. Sperduti, M., Guionnet, S., Fossati, P., & Nadel, J. (2014). Mirror Neuron System and Mentalizing System connect during online social interaction. Cognitive processing, 15(3), 307-316.
  90. Spunt, R.P., & Lieberman, M.D. (2012). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior. Neuroimage, 59(3), 3050-3059.
  91. Spunt, R.P., Satpute, A.B., & Lieberman, M.D. (2011). Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: an fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 63-74.
  92. Tidoni, E., & Candidi, M. (2016). Commentary: Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 10.
  93. Tomasello, M. (1999). The human adaptation for culture. Annual review of anthropology, 509-529.
  94. Valk, S.L., Bernhardt, B.C., Bockler, A., Trautwein, F.M., Kanske, P., Singer, T. (2016). Socio-cognitive phenotypes differentially modulate large-scale structural covariance networks. Cerebral Cortex, pii,bhv319.
  95. Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 48(3), 564-584.
  96. Völlm, B.A., Taylor, A.N., Richardson, P., Corcoran, R., Stirling, J., McKie, S., ... & Elliott, R. (2006). Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage, 29(1), 90-98.
  97. Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of Us Disgusted in My Insula: The Common Neural Basis of Seeing and Feeling Disgust. Neuron, 40(3), 655-664. DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00679-2
  98. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
  99. Wolf, I., Dziobek, I., & Heekeren, H.R. (2010). Neural correlates of social cognition in naturalistic settings: a model-free analysis approach. Neuroimage,49(1), 894-904.
  100. Xi, C., Zhu, Y., Niu, C., Zhu, C., Lee, T. M., Tian, Y., & Wang, K. (2011). Contributions of subregions of the prefrontal cortex to the theory of mind and decision making. Behavioural brain research, 221(2), 587-593.
  101. Yang, D.Y.J., Rosenblau, G., Keifer, C., & Pelphrey, K.A. (2015). An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 263-275.
  102. Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K.N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature neuroscience, 15(5), 675-680.

  • Communicative, cognitive and emotional issues in selective mutism Micaela Capobianco, Luca Cerniglia, in Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems /2018 pp.445
    DOI: 10.1075/is.17018.cap
  • 2018 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom) Nicole Nascivera, Yari Mirko Alfano, Tilde Annunziato, Martina Messina, Vittoria Silviana Iorio, Valeria Cioffi, Raffaele Sperandeo, Margherita Rosato, Teresa Longobardi, Nelson Mauro Maldonato, pp.000321 (DOI:10.1109/CogInfoCom.2018.8639906)
  • Socio-affective and cognitive predictors of social adaptation in vulnerable contexts Alejandra Neely-Prado, Gorka Navarrete, David Huepe, Yuka Kotozaki, in PLOS ONE /2019 pp.e0218236
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218236
  • Coarticolazione temporale nelle combinazioni di gesti e parole: dati longitudinali in bambini nati a termine e pretermine nei primi due anni di età Micaela Capobianco, Luca Cerniglia, in RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA 2/2020 pp.547
    DOI: 10.3280/RIP2020-002005

Letizia Bartolomeo, Luca Cerniglia, Micaela Capobianco, Empatia e Teoria della Mente: una review narrativa su differenze e convergenze concettuali alla luce delle recenti scoperte neurobiologiche in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2018, pp 19-54, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2018-001003