The role of affordances and agency in the risk cognition

Author/s Daniela Mario
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/2
Language Italian Pages 33 P. 187-219 File size 292 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2018-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This contribute follows an embodied perspective in proposing an argument about the neuropsychological mechanisms which are involved in risk cognition. Building on the extensive research which has recently been made in neuroscience thanks to the new conception of the cognitive functioning opened by the discovery of mirror neurons, I will sustain that the perception/cognition of risk involves the affordance/agency dynamic and the emotional states associated with it. My hypothesis is that, in a given situation, the configuration that is created between the representation of the individual ‘possibilities of action’ (agency) and the opportunities of action offered by the situation or stimulus (affordances) leads the choice of behaviour to be assumed and, over time, sustains the favourable or unfavourable approach to the external situation. If the ‘representation’, in the context of the embodied simulation, passes through sensory-motor simulation of actions, my idea is that the level of risk tolerance (in everyday situations) is related to the type of configuration produced by the processes of simulation. These would be triggered by the perception of opportunities of actions (affordance) which are implied in a given situation, in relation to the potentiality of action which are recognised by an individual (self-efficacy). At a neural level, the configuration would emerge by the synaptic force which is due to more or less positive signals that are received from the outside (reward/punishment mechanisms). This reinforces some connections to the detriment of others (neural Darwinism theory). How are associative schemas of affordance/agency formed? And how do the configuration/ representations that actualise the single adaptive responses emerge? What are the conditions and factors that promote the development of a relevant aptitude towards risk, to avoid the effects of both excessive propensity and aversion to risk? These are the main issue at stake in this paper that aims to formulate new possible research threads within the above mentioned conceptual framework also in the field of educational and training sciences.

Keywords: Embodied simulation, primary emotions, affordance, agency, self-efficacy.

  1. Ammaniti, M., & Gallese, V. (2014). La Nascita dell’Intersoggettività. Lo Sviluppo del Sé tra Psicodinamica e Neurobiologia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Trad. it. Autoefficacia: teoria e applicazioni. (2000), Trento: Erikson.
  3. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S.A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action, Prentice Hall,
  5. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and Nature. Trad. it. Mente e Natura. (1984), Milano: Adelphi.
  6. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Trad. it. Verso un’ecologia della mente (1977), Milano: Adelphi.
  7. Bermudez, J.L., Marcel A., & Eilan, N. (1995). The Body and the Self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Borghi, A.M. (2010). Parole, non simboli. In Sistemi intelligenti, 1, 161-168.
  9. Bruner, J. (1960). The Process of Education. Trad. it. Dopo Dewey: il processo di apprendimento nelle due culture (1966), Roma: Armando.
  10. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., & Riggio, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system and action recognition. Brain and Language, 89, 370-376. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00356-0
  11. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grezes, J., Passingham, R.E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243-1249.
  12. Caramazza, A. (2009). Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence for mirror neurons. PNAS, 106(24), 9925-9930.
  13. Damasio, A.R. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain, New York: Pantheon. Trad. it. Il sé viene alla mente. La costruzione del cervello cosciente (2013), Milano: Adelphi.
  14. Damasio, A.R. (1995). L’errore di Cartesio, Milano: Adelphi. Ed.orig. Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. (1994), New York: Putnam.
  15. Edelman, G.M. (2007). Seconda natura. Scienza del cervello e conoscenza umana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore. Orig. Second nature; Brain Science and Human Knowledge (2006).
  16. Edelman, G.M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York, US: Basic Books. Trad. it. Darwinismo neurale. La teoria della selezione dei gruppi neuronali. (1995), Torino: Einaudi.
  17. Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology, MIT Press. La mente modulare (1999), Bologna: il Mulino.
  18. Gallese, V. (2007). Dai neuroni specchio alla consonanza intenzionale. Meccanismi neurofisiologici dell’intersoggettivita. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 53(1), 197-208.
  19. Gallese, V. (2008a). Il corpo teatrale: Mimetismo, neuroni specchio, simulazione incarnata. Culture Teatrali, 16, 13-38.
  20. Gallese, V. (2008b). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317-333.
  21. Gallese, V. (2013). Bodily self, affect, consciousness and the cortex. Neuropsychoanalysis, 15(1), pp. 42-45.
  22. Gallese, V. & Cuccio, V. (2015). The paradigmatic body. Embodied simulation, intersubjectivity and the bodily self. In T. Metzinger & J.M. Windt (Eds.): Open MIND. Frankfurt: MIND Group, pp. 1-23.
  23. 10.15502/9783958570269. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
  24. Gallese,V. & Guerra, M. (2015). Lo schermo empatico, Cinema e Neuroscienze, Milano: Raffaele Cortina Editore.
  25. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Reason and Language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455-479.
  26. Gallese, V., Migone, P., & Eagle, M.E. (2006). La simulazione incarnata: i neuroni specchio, le basi neurofisiologiche dell’intersoggettivita. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane XL, 543-580.
  27. Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2009). The bodily self as power for action. Neuropsychologia., 48(3), 746-55.
  28. Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). How the Body in Action shapes the Self. Consciousness Studies, 18, 117-143.
  29. Gibson, J.J (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston. Trad. it. Un approccio ecologico alla percezione visiva. (1999), Milano-Udine: Mimesis.
  30. Glimcher, P.W, Dorris, M.C., & Bayer, H.M. (2005). Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice, Games and economic behavior, 52, 213-256.
  31. Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
  32. Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Ferraro, L., Nicoletti, R., & Gallese, V. (2013). Observational learning without a model is influenced by the observer’s possibility to act: evidence from the Simon task. Cognition, 128, 23-64.
  33. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
  34. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
  35. Kahneman, D., & Tversky A. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
  36. Kahneman, D., (2012).Thinking, Fast and Slow. Pensieri lenti e veloci. (2012), Milano: Mondadori.
  37. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By, Chicago UP, Chicago, IL. (1998), Metafore e vita quotidiana. Milano: Bompiani.
  38. Langer, E.J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311-328.
  39. Mario, D. (2013). Se immagino capisco: Il ruolo dei processi simulativi e metaforici nella comprensione del testo. PhD thesis, Dottorato in Scienze della cognizione e della formazione, Universita Ca’Foscari, Venezia.
  40. Mario, D. (2015). I processi di rispecchiamento nelle relazioni educative e terapeutiche. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XLIX, 2, 243-274.
  41. 10.3280/PU2015-002005 Maturana, H.R., & Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living. Trad. it. Autopoiesi e cognizione, la realizzazione del vivente. (1985), Venezia: Marsilio.
  42. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The Phenomenology of Perception. Trad. it. La fenomenologia della percezione. (2003), Milano: Bompiani.
  43. Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things e The design of everyday things. La caffettiera del masochista. Psicopatologia degli oggetti quotidiani (1990), Milano: Giunti.
  44. Panksepp, J., & Biven, L., (2012). The Archeology of Mind. Neuroevolutionary Origins Of Human Emotions, New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Trad. it. Archeologia della mente. Origini neuroevolutive delle emozioni umane, Milano: Cortina, 2014.
  45. Panksepp, J. (1998), Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press.
  46. Peirce, C.S. (Ed.) (2008). Esperienza e percezione. Percorsi di fenomenologia. Luisi M. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
  47. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2006). So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  48. Rolls, E.T. (2005). Emotion explained, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Simon, H.A. (1955). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
  50. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.H, (1991). The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  51. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstein, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton (N.J): Princenton Univeristy Press.
  52. Zalocusky, K.A., Ramakrishnan, C., Lerner, T.N., Davidson, T.J., Knutson, B., e Deisseroth, K. (2016). Nucleus accumbens D2R neurons signal past unfavorable outcomes in decision-making. Nature, 531, 642-646.

Daniela Mario, Il ruolo delle affordances e il sé agente nella cognizione del rischio in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 2/2018, pp 187-219, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2018-002001