Public data and value creation in Italy.The findings from the Open Data 200 study

Author/s Francesca De Chiara
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/152
Language English Pages 19 P. 65-83 File size 149 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2018-152004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The debate developed around the value creation based on open data usage, raised exponentially over the years. However, «the commercial value of much core reference data was recognised well before the open data agenda took hold», as Boswarva reported in 2013. In Italy, data-sets of high commercial value are still the main source of revenue for some public bodies. This is the case of cadastral data and company register. The adoption of alternative business models for these data-rich organisations faces barriers and limitations. More investigations into the re-use of public sector information are needed to rethink how the public and private sectors can cooperate to achieve greater access, to improve value crea¬tion and to make well informed decisions based on evidence. In this article, the author takes the perspective of public data as a resource for value creation and discusses the findings of the Open Data 200 Italy study, an ongoing investigation into the re-use of open data.

Keywords: Open data, public data, value creation, open government

  1. Boswarva O. (2013). The cost of unlocking economic potential from core reference data. Published on the 23rd of May, 2013 on The Guardian. -- Text available at the website:
  2. Capgemini Consulting (2015). Creating Value through Open data. Study on the Impact of Re-use of Public Data Resources. European Union.
  3. Commissione di coordinamento SPC (2012). Linee guida per l’interoperabilità semantica attraverso i linked open data. Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale. -- Available at the website: v2.0_0.pdf.
  4. De Chiara F. (2012). Tracking the diffusion of open data policy in the EU. Paper presented at AISP/IPSA - XXII World Congress of Political Science, July 8-12, 2012, Madrid. -- Available at the website:
  5. De Chiara F. (2014). Il profitto dei beni collettivi. Published on the 26th of October, 2014 on Il Sole24Ore. -- Text available at:
  6. De Chiara F. (2015). Open Data 200 Italy, pronti a partire. -- Text available at the website:
  7. De Chiara F. (2016). Mapping the reusers of open data in Italy. The findings of Open Data 200 Italy study. Unpublished manuscript presented at the Open Data Research Symposium 2016, Madrid.
  8. Houghton J. (2011). Costs and Benefits of Data Provision. Report to the Australian National Data Service. Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University. -- Text available at:
  9. Howard A. (2014). Open Data 500: Proof that open data fuels economic activity. -- Text available at the website:
  10. Iemma R. (2013). L’informazione del settore pubblico: elementi per un’analisi economica. In: Ricolfi M., Sappa C., eds., Extracting Value from Public Sector Information. EVPSI, Napoli: ESI.
  11. Jetzek T. (2015). The Sustainable Value of Open Government Data Uncovering the Generative Mechanisms of Open Data through a Mixed Methods Approach, Copenhagen Business School, 1st edition PhD Series 24.2015, Copenaghen.
  12. Magalahes G., Roseira C., Manley L. (2014). Business Models for Open Government Data. ICEGOV2014 Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance: 365-370, October 27-30 2014, Guimaraes, Portugal, DOI: 10.1145/2691195.2691273.
  13. Manyika J., Chui M., Groves P., Farrell D., Van Kuiken S., Doshi E.A. (2013). Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. McKinsey Global Institute, 21. -- Text available at: with%20liquid%20information/MGI_Open_data_FullReport_Oct2013.ashx.
  14. Morando F., Iemma R., Basso S. (2013). Is there such a thing as free government data? Internet Policy Review, 2(4). DOI: 10.14763/2013.4.219.
  15. Open Data Institute (2015). Open data means business. London: The Open Data Institute. -- Text available at
  16. Picci L., Ragone M., Saggini P., Taibi D. (2015). Intervento: Analisi istruttoria di un incentivo agli Enti Locali per il rilascio di Open Data, Final report. -- Text available at the website:
  17. Pollock R. (2009). The economics of public sector information. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0920, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. -- Text available at:
  18. Sieber R.E., Johnson P.A. (2015). Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3): 308-315.
  19. Vickery G. (2011). Review of recent studies on PSI re-use and related market developments. Information Economics, Paris. -- Text available at the website:
  20. Welle Donker F., Van Loenen B., Bregt A.K. (2016). Open Data and Beyond. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(4), 48.
  21. Welle Donker F., Van Loenen B. (2017). How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? International Journal of Digital Earth, 10(3): 284-306. DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938.

  • Digitalization, accounting and accountability: A literature review and reflections on future research in public services Deborah Agostino, Iris Saliterer, Ileana Steccolini, in Financial Accountability & Management /2022 pp.152
    DOI: 10.1111/faam.12301

Francesca De Chiara, Public data and value creation in Italy.The findings from the Open Data 200 study in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 152/2018, pp 65-83, DOI: 10.3280/SL2018-152004