Green Ecosystem Services: TEV as tool to take decision for urban Planning

Author/s Francesca Neonato, Barbara Colaninno, Francesco Tomasinelli
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2018/2 Language English
Pages 28 P. 85-112 File size 434 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2018-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

A growing number of people is coming to live and work in cities, that now host more than 50% of the human population. Solutions to better handle this process are mandatory to ensure the wellbeing of citizens. In the environmental field, urban green infrastructures play a vital role as providers of Ecosystem Services. The more complex and structured urban green areas are, the more important their functions are. A purely aesthetic vision of green, as urban furniture, changes to a productive one, where green infrastructures provide benefits and Naturebased Solutions. Urban green infrastructures can be integrated into multifunctional ecological network, modelled on wider natural park networks at regional level, but with a special focus in people wellbeing. The procedure to develop a feasibility plan for an urban ecological network and some practical examples are here described. To promote this vision, new forms of exchange are emerging, such as PES (Payment for Ecosystem Services), that can be effective natural resources management tool that allows to internalize environmental costs and benefits in the decision-making process, while preserving the landscape and the environment. Assigning a value to the various Ecosystem Services is therefore an essential tool for policy makers, planners, investors and ordinary citizens, so being able to choose between different options in an aware way. A review of different methods to evaluate the Ecosystem Services provided by the various urban green typologies are illustrated with a wide bibliography.

Keywords: Ecosystem services, urban ecological networks, TEV.

Jel codes: Q57, Q26, H23

  1. ACTrees (2011). Benefits of Trees and Urban Forests: A Research List, Alliance for Community Trees --
  2. AGEA, Circolare Agea N. 48086 del 5 giugno 2018 --
  3. APAT (2003). Le biomasse legnose Un’indagine sulle potenzialità del settore forestale italiano nell’offerta di fonti di energia, Rapporti 30/2003 APAT
  4. Bartolini, R. (2016). PAC: come si calcola il valore dell’importo del pagamento greening il nuovo agricoltore, 28/01/2018 --
  5. Bernetti, I. (2003). La produzione di energia rinnovabile tramite biomassa – Lezioni base di Economia delle risorse e sviluppo economico settore legno – unifi --
  6. Bixler, R.D., Floyd, M.F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting and unconfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29 (4): 443-467. DOI: 10.1177/001391659702900401
  7. Boyle, C. et al. (2014). Greening cities a review of green infrastructure, Transforming Cities: Innovations for Sustainable Futures University of Auckland, Auckland.
  8. Cataldi, M., Morri, E., Scolozzi, R., Zaccarelli, N., Santolini, R., Pace, D., Venier, M., Berretta, C. (2009). Stima dei servizi ecosistemici a scala regionale come supporto a strategie di sostenibilità. In atti del XIX Congresso S.It.E: dalle vette Alpine alle profondità marine 15-18 settembre Bolzano - ISBN 978-88-88906-55-3.
  9. Chaparro, L., Terradas, J. (2009). Ecological services of urban forest in Barcelona. Centre de recerca ecològica i aplicacions forestals, Universitat autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra.
  10. Clark, C., Adriaens, P., Talbot, F.B. (2008). Green Roof Valuation: A Probabilistic Economic Analysis of Environmental Benefits, Environmental Science & Technology, Mar 15;42(6):2155-61
  11. CNT (2010). The Value of Green Infrastructure. A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits, CTN – Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago e American Rivers, Washington DC.
  12. Colaninno, B., Neonato, F. (2011). Oro verde. La valutazione economica delle funzioni del verde. Acer, 6, 20-31.
  13. Colin, A. (2004) : Evaluation des stock et des flux de carbone liés à l’activité forestière en Aquitanie – Indicateurs de gestion durable des forêts, Critère 1 «ressources forestières et cycle du carbone», Rapport final, Projet FORSEE.
  14. Colombo, A., Riva, M. (a cura di) (2008). Individuazione dei benefici diretti ed indiretti dell’attuazione del Progetto regionale ‘10.000 ettari di nuovi sistemi verdi’, IRER Lombardia, Codice IReR: 2006B021.
  15. Cvejić, R. et al. (2015). Report D3.1: A typology of urban green spaces, eco-system services provisioning services and demands, WP3 Seventh Framework Programme Green Surge.
  16. D’Amato, G. (2010). Urban air pollution and plant‐derived respiratory allergy. Clinical and experimental allergy, V. 30: 628-636.
  17. De Stefano, S., Deblinger, R.D. (2005). Wildlife as valuable natural resources vs intolerable pests: a suburban wildlife management model. Urban Ecosystems, 8: 179-190
  18. Depietri, Y., McPhearson, T. (2013). Chapter 6 – Integrating the Grey, Green, and Blue in Cities: Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Reduction in T.
  19. Elmqvist et al. (eds.), 2013. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_11, © The Authors 2013.
  20. Fabiani, S. (2015). Aspetti economici connessi ai cambiamenti climatici – L’economia dei beni ambientali, Corso Cambiamenti climatici e rischi emergenti per la salute – Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 14/15 dicembre 2015, Roma.
  21. Ferrini, F., Fini, A. (2017). Amico Albero, Edizioni ETS, Pisa.
  22. Franco, D., Luiselli, L. (2017). Strumenti innovativi per la gestione sostenibile delle risorse naturali della provincia di Roma – Il valore economico totale di boschi, zone umide e paesaggio rurale della provincia di Roma, Provincia di Roma e Capitale Lavoro S.p.A.
  23. Geron, C.D., Guenther, A.B., Pierce, T.E. (1994). An improved model for estimating emissions of volatile organic compounds from forests in the eastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99 (D6), 12773-12791.
  24. Gios e Goio, Aspetti metodologici per la valutazione economica dei beni ambientali con particolare riferimento al bosco di montagna.
  25. Gómez-Baggethun et al. (2013). Chapter 11 – Urban Ecosystem Services, in T. Elmqvist et al. (eds.). Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_11, © The Authors 2013.
  26. GSE (2018). EU ETS: Rapporto sulle aste di quote europee di emissione –II trimestre 2018, Gestore dei Servizi Energetici – GSE S.p.A. --
  27. Jorgensen, A., Anthopoulou, A. (2007). Enjoyment and fear in urban woodlands – Does age make a difference? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6 (4): 267-278
  28. Koskela, H., Pain, R. (2000). Revisiting fear and place: Women’s fear of attack and the built environment. Geoforum, 31 (2): 269-280
  29. Lawrie, J., Guenther, J., Cook, T., Meletiou, M. (2004). The economic impact of investments in bicycle facilities, North Carolina department of Transportation – Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation.
  30. LIPU, PE Studio, PN Studio, 2016. RICONNETTIMI. Connessione ecologica tra Parco Nord Milano e PLIS della Balossa tra i comuni di Cormano, Milano e Novate Milanese. Con il contributo di Fondazione Cariplo --
  31. Loreto et al. (2014). Plant volatiles and the environment. Plant, Cell and Environment, 37: 1905-1908,
  32. Lyytimäki, J., Sipilä, M. (2009). Hopping on one leg – The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8 (4): 309-315
  33. McPherson, G., Ferrini, F. (2010). Tree are good, but…, Arborist News, October 19 (5): 58-60.
  34. Morison, J., Mathieson, L. (2008). Scoping study economic value of irrigation in urban green open space, in The Irrigation Australian Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne 20 – 22/05/2008.
  35. Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA, Environmental Pollution, 116: 381-389, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7.
  36. Overbeke, C. (2008). Do trees really cause so much damage to property? Journal of bulding appraisal, 3 (4): 247-258.
  37. Partenaude, G.L., Briggs, B.D.J., Milne, R., Rowland, C.S., Dawson, T.P., Pryor, S.N. (2003). The carbon pool in a British semi-natural woodland. Forestry, 76: 109-119: DOI 10.1093/forestry/76.1.109.
  38. Pasero, A. (2018). Agea stabilisce la percentuale per il calcolo del greening al 50,79 per cento: le possibilità per gli agricoltori, settembre 2018 --
  39. Peper, P.J. et al. (2007). New York City, New York municipal forest resource analysis, Center for urban forest research – USDA forest service, pacific southwest research station.
  40. Rao, M. et al. (2014). Assessing the relationship amoung urban trees, nitrogen dioxide, and respiratory health. Environmental pollution, 194: 96-104.
  41. Statzu, V. (2003). Il valore economico dei beni ambientali e le procedure di valutazione degli investimenti nel settore ambientale, Corso di Economia Ambientale 7-13/5/2003, Università degli Studi di Cagliari.
  42. Tattini et al. (2015). Isiprenoids and phenylpropanoids are part of ontioxidant defense orchestrated daily by drought-stressed Platanus x acerifolia plants during Mediterranean summer. New Phytol 37: 1950-1964 (I.F. 6.545)
  43. Tomalak et al. (2010). Negative and hazardous aspects of forest environment and human health, in Forest, Tree, Human Health and Well-being. K. Nilsson et al. (eds.). DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_4, c Springer science + business media B.V.: 77-125.
  44. Turner, R.K., Pearce, D.W., Bateman, I. (trad. a cura di Pellizari F.) (2003). Economia ambientale. il Mulino, Bologna.
  45. U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2004). Green Roofs, Federal Technology Alert – U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy --
  46. --;jsessionid=547D214EFB033924BFD80751366788CB.
  47. --
  48. --
  49. --
  50. --

  • A Systematic Literature Review of Historic Garden Management and Its Economic Aspects Cassandra Funsten, Valeria Borsellino, Emanuele Schimmenti, in Sustainability /2020 pp.10679
    DOI: 10.3390/su122410679

Francesca Neonato, Barbara Colaninno, Francesco Tomasinelli, Green Ecosystem Services: TEV as tool to take decision for urban Planning in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2018, pp 85-112, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2018-002005